Legitimate use of military force against state-sponsored - Air University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

______. “Problems with the Application of Norms Governing Interstate Armed Conflict to Non- International Armed Conflict.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 13, supp. (1983): 291-301. ______. “The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defense.” American Journal of International Law 57, no. 3 (July 1963). ______. and Edward R. Cummings. “A Survey of Penal Sanctions under Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 9 (Fall 1977): 205-51. “Special Report: Terrorism.” The World and I, no. 3 (March 1986): 38-102. Stein, Ted L. “Contempt, Crisis, and the Court: The World Court and the Hostage Rescue Attempt.” American Journal of International Law 76, no. 3 (July 1982): 499-531. Stevenson, John R. “International Law and the Export of Terrorism.” Department of State Bulletin 67, no. 1745 (4 December 1972): 645-52. “Study Finds Terrorism Lower since U.S. Raid.” Washington Times, 13 August 1986, 8. Summers, Harry G., Jr. “Anti-Terrorism Game Plan.” Book Review. Washington Times, 20 May 1986, 1(D). Sundberg, Jacob W. F. “Comments on the Fourth Interim Report of the Committee on International Terrorism.” Terrorism: An International Journal 7, no. 2 (1984): 185-92. “Syria and Terrorism.” Editorial, Wall Street Journal, 9 October 1986, 34. “Terrorism and Countermeasures: Is Section 905 of the Revised Restatement Helpful?” International Law Practitioner’s Handbook, no. 32 (May 1986): 10-12. “Terrorism Can Be Stopped.” Skeptic, no. 11 (January-February 1976): 45-53. “Terrorism: International Force the Best Way to Fight It.” Editorial, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 1 May 1986. Reprinted in Air Force News Clipping and Analysis Service, “Special Edition— Terrorism,” 3 July 1986, 38. “Terrorism’s Grim Upsurge: New Attacks Test Reagan’s Will to Deliver Threatened Response.” U.S. News & World Report, 22 September 1986, 32. Terry, James P. Lt Col, USMC. “An Appraisal of Lawful Military Response to State-Sponsored Terrorism.” Naval War College Review 39, no. 3 (May-June 1986): 59-68. ______. “State Terrorism: A Juridical Examination in Terms of Existing International Law.” Journal of Palestine Studies 10, no. 1 (Autumn 1980): 94-117. Tharp, Paul A., Jr. “The Laws of War as a Potential Legal Regime for the Control of Terrorist Activities.” Journal of International Affairs 32, no. 1 (1978): 91-100. Tillema, Herbert K., and John R. van Wingen. “Law and Power in Military Intervention.” International Studies Quarterly 26, no. 2 (June 1982): 220-50. Toensing, Victoria. “International Law and Activities of Armed Bands.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 7 (1958). Toman, Jiri. “Terrorism and the Regulation of Armed Conflict.” In International Terrorism and Political Crimes, ed. M. Cherif Bassiouni, 3d Conference on Terrorism and Political Crimes, 1973, 133-54. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas for International Institute for Advanced Criminal Sciences, 1975. Trent, Darrell M. “Terrorism: Threat and Reality.” Vital Speeches 46, no. 3 (15 November 1979), 79-83. Truver, Scott C. “Maritime Terrorism, 1985.” US Naval Institute, Proceedings 112 (May 1986): 160-68.
Turner, Stansfield. “What the U.S. Should Have Done Before It Bombed Libyan Targets.” Des Moines Register, 20 May 1986, 20. “US Exercises Right of Self-Defense against Libyan Terrorism.” Department of State Bulletin 86, no. 2111 (June 1986): 1-23. “U.S. Is Said to Brace for Libya Crisis.” Philadelphia Inquirer, 26 August 1986, 4. Vagts, Detlev F. “International Law under Time Pressure: Grading the Grenada Take-Home Examination.” American Journal of International Law 78, no. 1 (January 1984): 169-72. Vought, Donald B., Lt Col, USA, Retired, and James H. Fraser, Jr., Lt Col, USA. “Terrorism: The Search for Working Definitions.” Military Review 66, no. 7 (July 1986): 70-76. Walcott, John, and Youssef M. Ibrahim. “U.S. Suggests It May Relax Bid to Halt Weapons Flow to Iran to Free Hostages.” Wall Street Journal, 5 November 1986, 3. Waldock, Sir Humphrey. “The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law.” Recueil des Cours 81, pt. 2 (1952). “The War Powers Resolution and Antiterrorist Operations.” Department of State Bulletin 86, no. 2113 (August 1986): 68-71. Watkins, James D., Adm, USN. “Terrorism: An ‘Already Declared’ War.” Wings of Gold 9, no. 2 (Summer 1984). 19-21. Weeks, Albert L. “Terrorism, With Moscow’s Backing. Aiming Increasingly at U.S. Targets. “New York City Tribune, 15 May l986, 1. ______. “Moscow a Key, But Shadowy, Member of ‘Terrorist Entente’.” New York City Tribune, 13 May 1986, 1. Whitley, Andrew. “Deaths from Terrorism ‘Double in 1985’.” Financial limes, 14 August 1986, 4. Wilkinson, Paul. Book review essay, “Can a State Be a ‘Terrorist’?” Journal of International Affairs 57, no. 3 (Summer 1981): 467-72. ______. “Proposals for Government and International Responses to Terrorism.” Terrorism: An International Journal 5, nos. 1-2 (1981): 161-93. ______. “Proposals for a Liberal-Democratic Government Response to Terrorism and Low- Intensity Violence at Domestic and International Levels,” In Terrorism and Beyond: An International Conference on Terrorism and Low-Level Conflict, ed. Brian M. Jenkins, Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corp., 1982. Rand, R-2714-DOE/DOJ/DOS/RC. Williams, Glanville L. “The Judicial Basis of Hot Pursuit.” In British Year Book of International Law, 1939, vol. 20. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press for Royal Institute for International Affairs, 1939. Williamson, David, Jr. “Terrorism: What Should We Do?” In Terrorism, ed. Steven Anzovin, The Reference Shelf, vol. 58, no. 3, 173-77. New York: H. W. Wilson Co., 1986. Wright, Jeffery W., Maj, USA. “Terrorism: A Mode of Warfare.” Military Review 64, no. 10 (October 1984): 35-45. Wright, Quincy. “The Cuban Quarantine.” American Journal of International Law 57, no. 3 (1963): 546-65. ______. “The Goa Incident.” American Journal of International Law 56, no. 3 (1962): 628. Studies (Published) Bass, Gail, et al. Options for U.S. Policy on Terrorism. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corp., 1981. Rand, R-2764-RC.
Page 2 and 3:
LEGITIMATE USE OF MILITARY FORCE AG
Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS Page Disclaimer ii Forewor
Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 7 USE OF MILITARY FORCE: TE
Page 8 and 9:
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Lt Col Richard J.
Page 10 and 11:
INTRODUCTION THE RELEVANCE OF INTER
Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 7 summarizes the lessons le
Page 14 and 15:
This Study, How Meaningful? States
Page 16 and 17:
The international arena has seen so
Page 18 and 19:
Combating terrorism accents this is
Page 20 and 21:
7. Many scholars and jurists have f
Page 22 and 23:
Jenkins, “Combatting Terrorism Be
Page 24 and 25:
Thoughts toward an International Co
Page 26 and 27:
29. See Vice President, Report on C
Page 28 and 29:
CHAPTER 1 WHAT IS TERRORISM AND HOW
Page 30 and 31:
If a general definition would be so
Page 32 and 33:
Terrorism is the unlawful use or th
Page 34 and 35:
International Terrorism: A Working
Page 36 and 37:
there is evidence that President Id
Page 38 and 39:
The Vice President’s Task Force o
Page 40 and 41:
A Threat More Serious Than Numbers
Page 42 and 43:
Diplomatic relations between countr
Page 44 and 45:
And what has the challenge become?
Page 46 and 47:
physically or by neutralizing their
Page 48 and 49:
27. UN General Assembly, resolution
Page 50 and 51:
44. L. C. Green of the University o
Page 52 and 53:
65. Information provided by L. Cart
Page 54 and 55:
105. See Stephen Sloan, Beating int
Page 56 and 57:
The law of armed conflict approach
Page 58 and 59:
But, as regards terrorism, the arme
Page 60 and 61:
1. If the law of armed conflict is
Page 62 and 63:
Although both approaches, law enfor
Page 64 and 65:
crime involved. This initiative has
Page 66 and 67:
Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) wa
Page 68 and 69:
eaches, prosecution, and extraditio
Page 70 and 71:
the latter instance, no one claimed
Page 72 and 73:
international law establishing indi
Page 74 and 75:
Another issue is the choice and use
Page 76 and 77:
NOTES 1. Department of State, “Li
Page 78 and 79:
28. Paul A. Tharp, Jr., “The Laws
Page 80 and 81:
1919 a process has been under way t
Page 82 and 83:
66. See Geneva Convention IV, artic
Page 84 and 85:
CHAPTER 3 STATES HAVE RESPONSIBILIT
Page 86 and 87:
International Terrorism and the Dut
Page 88 and 89:
government exercises within its ter
Page 90 and 91:
few states, although they do not vi
Page 92 and 93:
to establish the linkage required u
Page 94 and 95:
chapters 4-6 examine the second. Te
Page 96 and 97:
all Members shall refrain in their
Page 98 and 99:
valuable tools of self-help and of
Page 100 and 101:
object the removal or destruction o
Page 102 and 103:
10. Jordan J. Paust, “Entebbe and
Page 104 and 105:
34. See “Terrorism’s Grim Upsur
Page 106 and 107:
through activities that involve for
Page 108 and 109:
CHAPTER 4 INDIVIDUAL SELF-DEFENSE A
Page 110 and 111:
Strictly speaking, the right of ind
Page 112 and 113:
Clearly, however, states may not re
Page 114 and 115:
Although the degree of control that
Page 116 and 117:
The expansive school’s belief tha
Page 118 and 119:
What is the customary law on self-d
Page 120 and 121:
await the arrival on scene of an ar
Page 122 and 123:
Reasonable Response This element re
Page 124 and 125:
Summary and Transition Individual s
Page 126 and 127:
Security; Implications of Israel’
Page 128 and 129:
In response to this line of reasoni
Page 130 and 131:
American Society of International L
Page 132 and 133:
Brownlie, “Use of Force,” 231.
Page 134 and 135:
avoided if the focus is put properl
Page 136 and 137:
The danger of conceding to individu
Page 138 and 139:
Fifth, and finally, article 52, par
Page 140 and 141:
12. See Rosalyn Higgins, “The Leg
Page 142 and 143:
CHAPTER 6 OTHER LEGAL ARGUMENTS TO
Page 144 and 145:
conditions necessary for invitation
Page 146 and 147:
The action must be taken for a puni
Page 148 and 149: …Yet, essentially for reasons of
Page 150 and 151: The action must be necessitated by
Page 152 and 153: emained so once the operations were
Page 154 and 155: Perhaps the best ease for humanitar
Page 156 and 157: The state contemplating interventio
Page 158 and 159: Many have criticized the modern law
Page 160 and 161: NOTES 1. See J. E. S. Fawcett, ‘I
Page 162 and 163: 27. Bowett writes, ‘‘Reprisals
Page 164 and 165: 49. See Bowett, Self-Defence, 88. 5
Page 166 and 167: An International Journal 7, no. 2 (
Page 168 and 169: This study has considered each of t
Page 170 and 171: Piracy, which is limited to illegal
Page 172 and 173: NOTES 1. Joint Chiefs of Stall, Uni
Page 174 and 175: 3. The action is taken to protect e
Page 176 and 177: Option 4: Collective Anticipatory S
Page 178 and 179: Option 8: Peacetime Reprisal Source
Page 180 and 181: 8. The action is for a limited dura
Page 182 and 183: APPENDIX B UNITED NATIONS CHARTER (
Page 184 and 185: APPENDIX C STATUTE OF THE INTERNATI
Page 186 and 187: Crelinsten, Ronald D., Danielle Lab
Page 188 and 189: Almond, Harry E., Jr. “Using Law
Page 190 and 191: Clark, Roger S. “Humanitarian Int
Page 192 and 193: Harlow, Bruce, Lt Comdr, USN. “Th
Page 194 and 195: Livingstone, Neil C., and Terrell B
Page 196 and 197: Paust, Jordan 5. “Entebbe and Sel
Page 200 and 201: Blum, Yehuda. State Terrorism and t
Page 202 and 203: “European Convention on the Suppr
Page 204 and 205: ______. Arms Control and Disarmamen
Page 206 and 207: ______. “Terrorist Attacks on US
show all

Legitimate use of military force against state-sponsored - Air University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?