22.08.2013 Views

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HYDRAULIC STOWAGE OF COAL<br />

WASTES IN COAL MINES.<br />

The British consul-general at Dusseldorf, Mr.<br />

Koenig, in his annual report, gives some interesting<br />

details on the subject of "Hydraulic Stowage<br />

of Coal Wastes in Coal Mines," says the Colliery<br />

Guardian. He says there is at present an everincreasing<br />

interest in hydraulic stowing of coal<br />

waste in the coal mines of Westphalia, and it is<br />

considered likely that the majority of the coal<br />

mines will sooner or later be compelled to adopt<br />

the hydraulic stowing as already introduced by a<br />

certain number of coal mining companies. The<br />

general idea of the method is to fill the void made<br />

in working with material carried by water from<br />

the surface. The object of hydraulic stowing is:<br />

1. To support the surface and prevent buildings<br />

from cracking.<br />

2. To allow of the working of the whole coal in<br />

very thick seams, thus dispensing with coal pillars.<br />

3. To prevent surface water from flooding the<br />

workings.<br />

4. To support the surface carrying roads and<br />

railways which would otherwise sink in the natural<br />

course of time.<br />

5. It is maintained that hydraulic stowing prevents<br />

fire by spontaneous ignition, thus causing<br />

greater safety to the miners.<br />

0. Hydraulic stowing is stated to be a saving<br />

in Ihe timber used underground.<br />

In olden times the main thing in coal mining was<br />

to produce large quantities of coal and thus keep<br />

down the cost per ton. Under government regulations<br />

certain pillars of coal had to be left to support<br />

railways and buildings. To-day the laws as<br />

to surface damages are very strict and claims for<br />

compensation are very frequent. The expenditure<br />

under this heading has become very considerable,<br />

so that in many cases hydraulic stowing<br />

has become a necessity. It would appear that<br />

under the new system of hydraulic stowing the<br />

leaving of coal pillars as supports would, to a<br />

large extent, become superfluous. The substitution<br />

of a complete support is one of the burning<br />

questions of the day, especially in the thickly populated<br />

mining and industrial district of Westphalia,<br />

where the value of landed property and buildings<br />

has increased so enormously.<br />

With regard to the materials used for hydraulic<br />

stowing, the ideal material would appear to be<br />

sand wherever immediately available. In many<br />

cases, however, pit waste, blast furnace slag, and<br />

ashes are used. The slag is reduced to a sandy<br />

state, and in this form proves to be very good<br />

stowing material. In Westphalia sand is not<br />

always available and substitutes have to be found.<br />

ground down, and well mixed before being flushed<br />

down the pipes for stowing purposes. In the<br />

Saarbrucken State mines the material used is<br />

THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN. 41<br />

chiefly boiler ashes and furnace slag mixed with<br />

brick clay. The storage there has proved so successful<br />

that they have been able to win the pillars<br />

of coal left to support the surface where formerly<br />

surface damage had taken place. It is<br />

said that in some cases in thick seams the loss of<br />

coal under the old system, apart from safety pillars<br />

left standing amounted to 40 to 50 per cent.,<br />

which, it is proved, would be entirely obviated<br />

under the new method. In many cases in Westphalia<br />

the coal is being worked from under the<br />

villages, and in some eases towns, where the damage<br />

caused to the surface used to be very heavy;<br />

the hydraulic system has been installed, and has<br />

proved a great success, preventing further subsi<br />

dence of the surface. It is generally considered<br />

that hydraulic stowing does not prevent surface<br />

damage entirely, but it has been proved to keep<br />

down the claims caused by subsidence of the surface<br />

to a minimum. In all cases hydraulic stowing<br />

has been found a great improvement on the<br />

old method, the coal output being increased, and<br />

the costs experienced in the past from claims for<br />

damages being vastly decreased.<br />

With regard to the pipes used for hydraulic<br />

stowing, steel or wrought iron is chiefly used, with<br />

a cast iron, cast steel, or porcelain lining. The<br />

diameter of the pipes averages about 7 inches. The<br />

cast iron lining appears to be the one preferred,<br />

and is less expensive than the porcelain lining.<br />

With regard to the cost of hydraulic stowing it<br />

appears to vary very much, according to the material<br />

used in flushing. The cheapest material is<br />

sand where it can be obtained on the spot, whereas<br />

the most expensive material is that which has to<br />

be ground down and mixed before it can be used.<br />

The actual cost of hydraulic stowdng would appear<br />

to be anything between 6d. and 1s. 6d. per ton of<br />

coal.<br />

When it is considered that under the old system<br />

of work the loss of coal is in some cases some 40<br />

to 50 per cent., and that the production in Germany<br />

in 1909 amounted to 148,900.000 tons, of<br />

which 85.000,000 tons, or nearly 60 per cent., was<br />

produced in the mining board district of Dortmund,<br />

and that Germany's total output in 1910<br />

amounted to 153,000,000 tons, it would mean a dead<br />

loss (taking 20 per cent, only as an average loss)<br />

of coal left in the pit of about 30,000.000 tons in<br />

one year, an enormous saving in national wealth<br />

being possible in the adoption of the hydraulic<br />

stowing system, which is so simple and inexpensive.<br />

Assuming the production in the United<br />

Kingdom to be at the very least 270,000,000 tons<br />

per annum, there would be a saving of 54,000,000<br />

tons per annum at least.<br />

The advantages claimed in Westphalia are as<br />

follow:<br />

1. The increase of the total coal output per

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!