u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HYDRAULIC STOWAGE OF COAL<br />
WASTES IN COAL MINES.<br />
The British consul-general at Dusseldorf, Mr.<br />
Koenig, in his annual report, gives some interesting<br />
details on the subject of "Hydraulic Stowage<br />
of Coal Wastes in Coal Mines," says the Colliery<br />
Guardian. He says there is at present an everincreasing<br />
interest in hydraulic stowing of coal<br />
waste in the coal mines of Westphalia, and it is<br />
considered likely that the majority of the coal<br />
mines will sooner or later be compelled to adopt<br />
the hydraulic stowing as already introduced by a<br />
certain number of coal mining companies. The<br />
general idea of the method is to fill the void made<br />
in working with material carried by water from<br />
the surface. The object of hydraulic stowing is:<br />
1. To support the surface and prevent buildings<br />
from cracking.<br />
2. To allow of the working of the whole coal in<br />
very thick seams, thus dispensing with coal pillars.<br />
3. To prevent surface water from flooding the<br />
workings.<br />
4. To support the surface carrying roads and<br />
railways which would otherwise sink in the natural<br />
course of time.<br />
5. It is maintained that hydraulic stowing prevents<br />
fire by spontaneous ignition, thus causing<br />
greater safety to the miners.<br />
0. Hydraulic stowing is stated to be a saving<br />
in Ihe timber used underground.<br />
In olden times the main thing in coal mining was<br />
to produce large quantities of coal and thus keep<br />
down the cost per ton. Under government regulations<br />
certain pillars of coal had to be left to support<br />
railways and buildings. To-day the laws as<br />
to surface damages are very strict and claims for<br />
compensation are very frequent. The expenditure<br />
under this heading has become very considerable,<br />
so that in many cases hydraulic stowing<br />
has become a necessity. It would appear that<br />
under the new system of hydraulic stowing the<br />
leaving of coal pillars as supports would, to a<br />
large extent, become superfluous. The substitution<br />
of a complete support is one of the burning<br />
questions of the day, especially in the thickly populated<br />
mining and industrial district of Westphalia,<br />
where the value of landed property and buildings<br />
has increased so enormously.<br />
With regard to the materials used for hydraulic<br />
stowing, the ideal material would appear to be<br />
sand wherever immediately available. In many<br />
cases, however, pit waste, blast furnace slag, and<br />
ashes are used. The slag is reduced to a sandy<br />
state, and in this form proves to be very good<br />
stowing material. In Westphalia sand is not<br />
always available and substitutes have to be found.<br />
ground down, and well mixed before being flushed<br />
down the pipes for stowing purposes. In the<br />
Saarbrucken State mines the material used is<br />
THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN. 41<br />
chiefly boiler ashes and furnace slag mixed with<br />
brick clay. The storage there has proved so successful<br />
that they have been able to win the pillars<br />
of coal left to support the surface where formerly<br />
surface damage had taken place. It is<br />
said that in some cases in thick seams the loss of<br />
coal under the old system, apart from safety pillars<br />
left standing amounted to 40 to 50 per cent.,<br />
which, it is proved, would be entirely obviated<br />
under the new method. In many cases in Westphalia<br />
the coal is being worked from under the<br />
villages, and in some eases towns, where the damage<br />
caused to the surface used to be very heavy;<br />
the hydraulic system has been installed, and has<br />
proved a great success, preventing further subsi<br />
dence of the surface. It is generally considered<br />
that hydraulic stowing does not prevent surface<br />
damage entirely, but it has been proved to keep<br />
down the claims caused by subsidence of the surface<br />
to a minimum. In all cases hydraulic stowing<br />
has been found a great improvement on the<br />
old method, the coal output being increased, and<br />
the costs experienced in the past from claims for<br />
damages being vastly decreased.<br />
With regard to the pipes used for hydraulic<br />
stowing, steel or wrought iron is chiefly used, with<br />
a cast iron, cast steel, or porcelain lining. The<br />
diameter of the pipes averages about 7 inches. The<br />
cast iron lining appears to be the one preferred,<br />
and is less expensive than the porcelain lining.<br />
With regard to the cost of hydraulic stowing it<br />
appears to vary very much, according to the material<br />
used in flushing. The cheapest material is<br />
sand where it can be obtained on the spot, whereas<br />
the most expensive material is that which has to<br />
be ground down and mixed before it can be used.<br />
The actual cost of hydraulic stowdng would appear<br />
to be anything between 6d. and 1s. 6d. per ton of<br />
coal.<br />
When it is considered that under the old system<br />
of work the loss of coal is in some cases some 40<br />
to 50 per cent., and that the production in Germany<br />
in 1909 amounted to 148,900.000 tons, of<br />
which 85.000,000 tons, or nearly 60 per cent., was<br />
produced in the mining board district of Dortmund,<br />
and that Germany's total output in 1910<br />
amounted to 153,000,000 tons, it would mean a dead<br />
loss (taking 20 per cent, only as an average loss)<br />
of coal left in the pit of about 30,000.000 tons in<br />
one year, an enormous saving in national wealth<br />
being possible in the adoption of the hydraulic<br />
stowing system, which is so simple and inexpensive.<br />
Assuming the production in the United<br />
Kingdom to be at the very least 270,000,000 tons<br />
per annum, there would be a saving of 54,000,000<br />
tons per annum at least.<br />
The advantages claimed in Westphalia are as<br />
follow:<br />
1. The increase of the total coal output per