u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN. 39<br />
PREPARATION OF COAL*<br />
By Dennis Dorris. Chief Coal Inspector Susquehanna Coal Company.<br />
Chief Coal Inspector, Susquehanna Coal Co.<br />
* Paper read at the meeting of the Nanticoke<br />
Mining Institute, Nanticoke, Pa., Nov. 3, 1911.<br />
A great many of the coal dealers and consumers<br />
outside of the coal producing region of Pennsylvania<br />
are under the impression that the coal<br />
companies make no pretense or effort to properly<br />
prepare the shipments they receive, that they are<br />
the most abused class of people in the world, and<br />
that the companies have no scruples along these<br />
lines in preparing coal. I might say that the<br />
same opinion prevails among a great many people<br />
who reside in the shadow of the operations,<br />
who are not familiar with the work of preparing<br />
coal. They would cheerfully reverse their opinion<br />
if they would visit the different plants and<br />
witness the careful methods adopted in order to<br />
produce a well prepared product.<br />
Some years ago the position of colliery inspector<br />
was considered a farce, and only a feeble effort<br />
was made by him to hold up the standard of<br />
preparation, owing to the fact that he was deprived<br />
of the power of deciding as to whether<br />
the coal should be accepted or rejected. The foreman,<br />
or his assistant, were usually the people who<br />
would pass judgment as to whether the coal should<br />
go forward or not. Many exciting scenes and<br />
tilts were witnessed in the vicinity of the "loaded"<br />
tracks between the breaker foreman and the coal<br />
inspector over some questionable coal—and the<br />
disposition to be made of the same. The superintendent<br />
was continually in a turmoil and kept<br />
busy rendering decisions as to who was right in<br />
this matter, and in almost every instance his decisions<br />
would be rendered in favor of the coal<br />
going forward. In those days an outside foreman<br />
dreaded the thought of his coal being turned back,<br />
as his reputation and pride was bitterly attacked,<br />
and was always willing and ready to battle at<br />
the mere mention of condemned coal. Nothing<br />
would be more pleasing and gratifying to him<br />
than to be successful in a victory over the inspector<br />
on some questionable coal, and he would<br />
become highly enthusiastic over the great achievement.<br />
. Those who recall the troublesome days in the<br />
inspecting of anthracite coal, which greatly disturbed<br />
the trade by passing a<br />
POORLY PREPARED PRODUCT,<br />
which caused all kinds of abuse to be leveled<br />
at the head of the inspector, can realize the vast<br />
change in the system of inspecting.<br />
The duties of the present day coal inspector<br />
reach out over a large space. In this capacity,<br />
he is broad and convincing, and the absolute judge<br />
as to the quality of the preparation. When his<br />
decision is rendered by actual test, no one questions<br />
his authority as to the correctness of that<br />
test. Occasionally now you will meet a foreman<br />
who imagines the inspector is too severe and<br />
rigid in his work as to what he classifies slate<br />
and bone, and endeavors to convey this impression<br />
to the superintendent, and appeals to<br />
him for some relief, but that official, unlike<br />
in the troublesome days, promptly waves him<br />
aside and advises him that the inspector's word<br />
is final. By doing this he realizes the necessity<br />
of protecting the consumer against such overzealous<br />
officials.<br />
The managers and superintendents of today are<br />
the most vigorous expounders of the rights and<br />
needs of the consumer and have done much to<br />
counteract the anti-colliery inspector feeling<br />
which for years has been so detrimental to the<br />
coal business. They have learned the cost of ill<br />
will, and the profits in good will, in the sale of<br />
anthracite coal. The management has come to<br />
realize in this great industry, which has so many<br />
common interests, that each is so dependent on<br />
the other that one cannot remain apart and maintain<br />
its full individual efficiency. Today one cannot<br />
help noticing the wonderful change existing<br />
between the breaker foreman, his <strong>org</strong>anization,<br />
and the coal inspector. They are in complete harmony<br />
and there is an air of old fashioned hospitality<br />
about the operations, a spirit of comradeship,<br />
and a pleasant feeling among those who<br />
are working for one common cause, which makes<br />
it appear so different from the old days. The<br />
breaker foreman has come to believe that the<br />
coal inspector is one of the most important employees.<br />
In fact, he considers him a necessity,<br />
as he not only keeps him posted on the condition<br />
of his coal, but also keeps him well informed by<br />
frequently testing the refuse, so that that end of<br />
the operation will not show a heavy percentage<br />
of loss of merchantable coal going to the bank.<br />
This is considered a serious problem and one<br />
that it is necessary to closely guard against,<br />
which, eventually, greatly affects the "prepared"<br />
sizes.<br />
There is a rule governing the inspection of<br />
anthracite coal both for size and impurities.<br />
Each size is limited to a certain percentage of<br />
slate and bone, and when these percentages are<br />
exceeded, the coal is<br />
NOT CONSIDERED MERCHANTABLE<br />
and is promptly condemned and re-prepared. It<br />
is, therefore, necessary that the breaker provide<br />
*Paper read at the meeting of the Nanticoke Mining Insti machinery for the treatment of condemned coal.<br />
tute. Nanticoke. Pa.. November 3. 1911.