22.08.2013 Views

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN. 39<br />

PREPARATION OF COAL*<br />

By Dennis Dorris. Chief Coal Inspector Susquehanna Coal Company.<br />

Chief Coal Inspector, Susquehanna Coal Co.<br />

* Paper read at the meeting of the Nanticoke<br />

Mining Institute, Nanticoke, Pa., Nov. 3, 1911.<br />

A great many of the coal dealers and consumers<br />

outside of the coal producing region of Pennsylvania<br />

are under the impression that the coal<br />

companies make no pretense or effort to properly<br />

prepare the shipments they receive, that they are<br />

the most abused class of people in the world, and<br />

that the companies have no scruples along these<br />

lines in preparing coal. I might say that the<br />

same opinion prevails among a great many people<br />

who reside in the shadow of the operations,<br />

who are not familiar with the work of preparing<br />

coal. They would cheerfully reverse their opinion<br />

if they would visit the different plants and<br />

witness the careful methods adopted in order to<br />

produce a well prepared product.<br />

Some years ago the position of colliery inspector<br />

was considered a farce, and only a feeble effort<br />

was made by him to hold up the standard of<br />

preparation, owing to the fact that he was deprived<br />

of the power of deciding as to whether<br />

the coal should be accepted or rejected. The foreman,<br />

or his assistant, were usually the people who<br />

would pass judgment as to whether the coal should<br />

go forward or not. Many exciting scenes and<br />

tilts were witnessed in the vicinity of the "loaded"<br />

tracks between the breaker foreman and the coal<br />

inspector over some questionable coal—and the<br />

disposition to be made of the same. The superintendent<br />

was continually in a turmoil and kept<br />

busy rendering decisions as to who was right in<br />

this matter, and in almost every instance his decisions<br />

would be rendered in favor of the coal<br />

going forward. In those days an outside foreman<br />

dreaded the thought of his coal being turned back,<br />

as his reputation and pride was bitterly attacked,<br />

and was always willing and ready to battle at<br />

the mere mention of condemned coal. Nothing<br />

would be more pleasing and gratifying to him<br />

than to be successful in a victory over the inspector<br />

on some questionable coal, and he would<br />

become highly enthusiastic over the great achievement.<br />

. Those who recall the troublesome days in the<br />

inspecting of anthracite coal, which greatly disturbed<br />

the trade by passing a<br />

POORLY PREPARED PRODUCT,<br />

which caused all kinds of abuse to be leveled<br />

at the head of the inspector, can realize the vast<br />

change in the system of inspecting.<br />

The duties of the present day coal inspector<br />

reach out over a large space. In this capacity,<br />

he is broad and convincing, and the absolute judge<br />

as to the quality of the preparation. When his<br />

decision is rendered by actual test, no one questions<br />

his authority as to the correctness of that<br />

test. Occasionally now you will meet a foreman<br />

who imagines the inspector is too severe and<br />

rigid in his work as to what he classifies slate<br />

and bone, and endeavors to convey this impression<br />

to the superintendent, and appeals to<br />

him for some relief, but that official, unlike<br />

in the troublesome days, promptly waves him<br />

aside and advises him that the inspector's word<br />

is final. By doing this he realizes the necessity<br />

of protecting the consumer against such overzealous<br />

officials.<br />

The managers and superintendents of today are<br />

the most vigorous expounders of the rights and<br />

needs of the consumer and have done much to<br />

counteract the anti-colliery inspector feeling<br />

which for years has been so detrimental to the<br />

coal business. They have learned the cost of ill<br />

will, and the profits in good will, in the sale of<br />

anthracite coal. The management has come to<br />

realize in this great industry, which has so many<br />

common interests, that each is so dependent on<br />

the other that one cannot remain apart and maintain<br />

its full individual efficiency. Today one cannot<br />

help noticing the wonderful change existing<br />

between the breaker foreman, his <strong>org</strong>anization,<br />

and the coal inspector. They are in complete harmony<br />

and there is an air of old fashioned hospitality<br />

about the operations, a spirit of comradeship,<br />

and a pleasant feeling among those who<br />

are working for one common cause, which makes<br />

it appear so different from the old days. The<br />

breaker foreman has come to believe that the<br />

coal inspector is one of the most important employees.<br />

In fact, he considers him a necessity,<br />

as he not only keeps him posted on the condition<br />

of his coal, but also keeps him well informed by<br />

frequently testing the refuse, so that that end of<br />

the operation will not show a heavy percentage<br />

of loss of merchantable coal going to the bank.<br />

This is considered a serious problem and one<br />

that it is necessary to closely guard against,<br />

which, eventually, greatly affects the "prepared"<br />

sizes.<br />

There is a rule governing the inspection of<br />

anthracite coal both for size and impurities.<br />

Each size is limited to a certain percentage of<br />

slate and bone, and when these percentages are<br />

exceeded, the coal is<br />

NOT CONSIDERED MERCHANTABLE<br />

and is promptly condemned and re-prepared. It<br />

is, therefore, necessary that the breaker provide<br />

*Paper read at the meeting of the Nanticoke Mining Insti­ machinery for the treatment of condemned coal.<br />

tute. Nanticoke. Pa.. November 3. 1911.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!