u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
u,.:- • - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Y2 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
THE TESTING OF LOCOMOTIVE FUEL/ 1<br />
By F O. Bunnell. Engineer of Tests. Rock Island Lines.<br />
It is gratifying to note that many railroads are<br />
giving the fuel question more serious consideration<br />
both from the standpoint of fuel and type of furnace<br />
used and b.v various tests of fuels such as<br />
tests between coal taken from different sources,<br />
coal as compared with oil, briquetting bituminous<br />
and lignite coal, evaporative efficiency under different<br />
boiler conditions, etc., they are gradually<br />
adopting the fuel most practical to use in a given<br />
territory and boiler conditions adapted to greater<br />
evaporative efficiency. There are many reasons<br />
for this activity on the part of the railroads,<br />
among which, with a brief explanation, are the<br />
following:<br />
A. Prof. Goss has estimated that in the average<br />
locomotive furnace 20 per cent, of tlie total fuel<br />
supplied to the locomotive performs no function<br />
in moving the train forward. Adding to this the<br />
losses due to radiation, adhesion to the rails, flange<br />
friction, etc., it is estimated that not over 5 per<br />
cent, of the latent heat value in the coal performs<br />
useful work in moving trains forward. In 1906<br />
out of 90,000,000 tons consumed, it is estimated but<br />
40,000,000 tons represented heat actually transmitted<br />
from the furnaces to water to be evaporated.<br />
Accepting the above figures as reasonably<br />
accurate, it is obvious there is urgent need of improvement<br />
first to utilize a greater percentage of<br />
the heat in evaporating the water, and second to<br />
reduce the losses of the resultant energy. There<br />
are certain conditions now existing on all railroads<br />
fixed by the type of locomotives now in use,<br />
in wdiich there can be an excessive use of fuel unless<br />
the furnace conditions are adapted to the fuel<br />
or the physical character of the fuel is adapted to<br />
the type of locomotive in which it is used, or if the<br />
fuel is of inferior quality.<br />
B. The fuel bills of a railroad occupy the most<br />
conspicuous part of the total cost of operation, in<br />
many cases amounting to 13 per cent, of the total<br />
cost of operation and 26 per cent, of the total transportation<br />
expenses; while these<br />
FIGURES WILL VARY,<br />
with different railroads, according to the kind of<br />
traffic handled, in glancing over the report of<br />
transportation expenses of the A & B railroad the<br />
item of fuel for locomotives amounting to about<br />
$6,600,000 stands out in bold comparison with any<br />
other item and with the total cost of transportation<br />
of about $25,000,000. In years past there has<br />
heen marked attention paid to the cost of lubricating<br />
oil which, in the statement referred to,<br />
amounts to about $106,000.<br />
C. It is a well known fact that there is a vast<br />
difference in the evaporative efliciency of fuel as<br />
obtained from the different localities and frequently<br />
between two sources in the same locality. For<br />
example the average range of heat units in locomotive<br />
fuel might be stated as follows:<br />
Fuel oil. from 15,800 to 20,200 B. t. u.<br />
Anthracite coal, from 12,900 to 14,700 B. t. u.<br />
Semi-bituminous coal, from 14.500 to 15,500 B.t.u.<br />
Bituminous coal, from 8,500 to 16,200 B. t. u.<br />
Briquettes - , 200 B. t. u. more than same grade<br />
of coal.<br />
Fuel is no longer fuel in the sense of the pioneer<br />
indiscriminate use of this utility, and while it is<br />
evident, from the above range in heat units, that<br />
fuel cannot always be used, with economy, on the<br />
basis of geographical location, attention is also<br />
called to the fact that the smallest range of variation<br />
per pound of fuel, as shown above, is 1,000<br />
heat units for semi-bituminous coal or 7 per cent.,<br />
and no railroad can afford this variation in its<br />
fuel hills without challenging the cause for same.<br />
D. There is also a great difference in the physical<br />
nature of the fuel; fuel oil varies in viscosity<br />
and specific gravity as well as in the flash and fire<br />
tests. Coals vary in specific gravity, hardness,<br />
I rittleness and tendency to crumble on exposure<br />
to the atmosphere. The character and quality of<br />
the ash of coals is also important: some coals have<br />
comparatively little ash and give no trouble from<br />
this source, while others have a large amount of<br />
ash. 18 per cent, in some cases; sometimes the ash<br />
clinkers badly or forms a semi-flux which on cooling<br />
has been known to practically seal tlie grate<br />
bars. The character of the ash made is frequently<br />
more important than the volume.<br />
To use fuel to the best practical advantage, in<br />
addition to the factors already mentioned, attention<br />
should be given to the difference in the physical<br />
nature of the fuel. The<br />
RATE OF I'RODfCIXG<br />
steam and the cost of same in a locomotive with a<br />
given furnace and front end adjustment are extremely<br />
sensitive to a change in the physical character<br />
of the fuel; is is, therefore, advisable to<br />
use fuel of the same physical character, on a railroad,<br />
over as wide range of territory as possible<br />
and it is equally important to insure that the socalled<br />
draft arrangements in all locomotives are<br />
carefully adjusted to burn the fuel to the best<br />
advantage in evaporative efficiency.<br />
While the above explains the reasons for the<br />
activity shown by most railroad managers in in<br />
'"Paper read before the meeting of the International Railvestigating fuel conditions, it also serves to emway<br />
Fuel Association.