2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Concurrent Symposia<br />
invariable in the healthy populations, but increased in these cancerprone<br />
individuals (p=0.01). Expanding on the initial analysis and using<br />
multiple algorithms and a replication cohort <strong>of</strong> LFS DNA (n=22) hybridized<br />
on Affymetrix 6.0GW high resolution arrays we now demonstrate<br />
that: 1) CNV deletions are more frequent than duplications in mutation<br />
carriers (p=3.28 x 10 5 ); 2) the overall number <strong>of</strong> CNVs exceeds 300<br />
in carriers (154 in controls); and 3) the difference in CNVs persists in<br />
these individuals’ tumors. We have also recently uncovered rare CNV<br />
deletions at 17p13.1 in LFS patients (n=4) and in patients with multiple<br />
congenital abnormalities but no cancer phenotype (n=4). This led us<br />
to posit that structural features <strong>of</strong> specific CNVs in the region may<br />
play a role in distinguishing a cancer from a non-cancer phenotype.<br />
The CNVs at 17p13.1 all include TP53 but range in size from 4.236<br />
to 2Mbp. The large deletions, causing happloinsufficiency <strong>of</strong> nearly 40<br />
genes, are associated with a broad phenotype that includes multiple<br />
congenital abnormalities, while smaller focal TP53 deletions (from exons<br />
2 to 11) are associated with cancer susceptibility. Using qPCR and<br />
long-range PCR, we continue to fine map these deletions with the goal<br />
<strong>of</strong> finding the sequence features and mechanisms which cause these<br />
large genomic events (e.g. LCR-mediated NAHR). Our results suggest<br />
an important role <strong>of</strong> DNA structural variation in cancer susceptibility,<br />
and these models will be discussed during this presentation.<br />
s08.3<br />
Familial gastric cancer<br />
C. Caldas;<br />
Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Dep.<strong>of</strong> Oncology, Functional<br />
Breast Cancer Genomics Lab, Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />
No abstract received as per date <strong>of</strong> printing. Please see www.eshg.<br />
org/eshg<strong>2009</strong> for updates.<br />
s09.1<br />
molecular karyotyping: From postnatal to preimplantation<br />
genetic diagnosis?<br />
J. Vermeesch;<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>, Afdeling CME-UZ, Leuven, Belgium.<br />
Molecular karyotyping or genome wide array CGH has been implemented<br />
in postnatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> patients with idiopathic mental retardation<br />
and congenital anomalies and is challenging conventional<br />
karyotyping as the prime diagnostic tool. Despite its successes, interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the results coming from arrays with ever increasing resolution<br />
is becoming the main challenge. I will demonstrate how “Mendelian<br />
copy number variants” - apparently benign CNVs that can cause a<br />
disease phenotype dependent on copy number state, sex and genetic<br />
or environmental background - require large scale collaborative efforts<br />
to collect sufficient data and the development <strong>of</strong> expert systems to<br />
provide accurate diagnosis. The technology has, more recently, been<br />
applied in a prenatal diagnostic setting. I will illustrate how the technology<br />
helps prenatal diagnosis, but also demonstrate the potential risks<br />
<strong>of</strong> using this technology. Finally, we developed a novel tool to genome<br />
wide screen CNV and SNP-genotype single cells. When applied to<br />
cleavage stage embryos from young fertile couples we discovered,<br />
unexpectedly, an extremely high incidence <strong>of</strong> chromosomal instability,<br />
a hallmark <strong>of</strong> tumorigenesis. Not only mosaicisms for whole chromosome<br />
aneuploidies and uniparental disomies but also frequent segmental<br />
deletions, duplications and amplifications that were reciprocal<br />
in sister blastomeres were detected in most cleavage stage embryos<br />
implying the occurrence <strong>of</strong> breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. As a consequence,<br />
PGD-AS will not improve the selection <strong>of</strong> genetically normal<br />
embryos. This not only explains the low human fecundity but also<br />
identifies postzygotic chromosomal instability as a leading cause <strong>of</strong><br />
constitutional chromosomal disorders.<br />
s09.2<br />
Prenatal diagnosis and fetal treatment using fetal RNA in<br />
maternal body fluids<br />
D. Bianchi;<br />
Tufts Medical Center, <strong>Genetics</strong>, Boston, MA, United States.<br />
Cell-free fetal (cff) DNA in maternal plasma provides a noninvasive<br />
source <strong>of</strong> fetal genetic material. Cff DNA is elevated in preeclampsia,<br />
placental abnormalities, and fetal aneuploidy. Qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
cff DNA in maternal plasma is already in clinical use worldwide for<br />
noninvasive prenatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Rhesus D and fetal gender. Excit-<br />
ing work has recently been published that suggests that cff DNA and<br />
RNA in maternal plasma can facilitate noninvasive prenatal diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> trisomies 18 and 21, using ratios <strong>of</strong> single nucleotide polymorphisms<br />
(SNPs) or using a shotgun sequencing approach. In our laboratory<br />
we are performing comparison gene expression microarray analyses<br />
between the pregnant woman and her newborn to detect fetal gene<br />
sequences that are indicative <strong>of</strong> normal and abnormal fetal development<br />
in the second and third trimesters (Maron et al. J Clin Invest<br />
2007; 117:3007-3019). Amniotic fluid supernatant is also a rich source<br />
<strong>of</strong> cell-free fetal DNA and RNA; it can provide novel information about<br />
gene expression and functional development in the living human fetus.<br />
We have generated preliminary data on fetal gene expression from<br />
cell free mRNA in amniotic fluid. This has led to the identification <strong>of</strong><br />
novel differentially-regulated genes, and disrupted biologic pathways<br />
in various fetal pathologies such as twin to twin transfusion syndrome,<br />
fetal hydrops, and trisomy 21. Functional genomic analysis <strong>of</strong> second<br />
trimester fetuses with trisomy 21 suggests that oxidative stress, ion<br />
transport, and G-protein signaling are important. Most recently, we<br />
have used the Connectivity Map to generate testable hypotheses regarding<br />
fetal treatment with small molecule drugs. The Connectivity<br />
Map “connects” disease states, biological systems disruption (as measured<br />
by pathway analysis), and pharmaceutical compounds to treat<br />
the disease. This allows a true translation from bench to bedside, and<br />
suggests a possible continuum between prenatal diagnosis and fetal<br />
therapy. Supported by National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health R01 HD42053-06.<br />
s09.3<br />
the challenge <strong>of</strong> prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> mitochondrial disorders<br />
C. de Die-Smulders, H. Smeets;<br />
University Hospital Maastricht, Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Maastricht, The<br />
Netherlands.<br />
Mitochondrial diseases are caused by defects in the oxidative phosphorylation.<br />
They can be caused by mutations in nuclear or mitochondrial<br />
DNA (mtDNA) encoded genes. Mutation analysis <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />
genes in prenatal (PND) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is<br />
routine. Pitfalls do occur in biochemical analysis in PND. Mutations in<br />
the mtDNA lead to a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> diseases with very variable clinical<br />
expression. They are transmitted exclusively maternally and are<br />
usually heteroplasmic. Severity <strong>of</strong> symptoms is partially determined by<br />
mutation load. PND or PGD for mtDNA mutations is complex and experience<br />
is limited. Prerequisites for reliable PND <strong>of</strong> mtDNA mutations<br />
have been formulated by Poulton and Turnbull (2000) and include: 1.<br />
a close correlation between mutation load and disease manifestation<br />
2. no significant time-dependent changes in mutation load 3. a uniform<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> mutation load in different tissues. These criteria also apply<br />
for PGD.<br />
For genetic counseling one may subdivide the mitochondrial mutations<br />
in 5 categories: 1 de novo mutations. Recurrence risk is low and<br />
PND or PGD can be <strong>of</strong>fered for reassurance. 2. Inherited stable mutations,<br />
such as the m.8993T>G/C mutations (leading to NARP/Leigh<br />
syndrome). Outcome is favourable for this mutation when the mutation<br />
load is < 60%, while mutation load >90% is associated with a bad<br />
prognosis. Prediction <strong>of</strong> severity in the grey zone (60-90%) is difficult,<br />
but a tendency for percentages at the extremes has been observed<br />
in oocytes, which would favour conclusive results. PND was <strong>of</strong>fered<br />
more than 10 times. PGD for the m.8993T>G mutation has been reported<br />
once. 3. Inherited unstable mutations. The classical example<br />
is the m.3243A>G (MELAS) mutation. There is a certain correlation<br />
between mutation load and clinical severity but individual exceptions<br />
exist. It is impossible to define a completely safe lower threshold. A<br />
limited number <strong>of</strong> PNDs have been carried out. Mutant load was found<br />
to be fairly stable in CVS and amniotic cells. Oocytes and foetuses <strong>of</strong><br />
carrier women can be without mutant load, the number dependent on<br />
the mutation load <strong>of</strong> the carrier. PGD for the 3243A>G mutation was<br />
carried out by our group (unpublished results). Mutation load showed<br />
a broad range between embryos, but was equal in the blastocysts <strong>of</strong><br />
one embryo. Some embryos had a fairly low mutation load. 4. Rare<br />
mutations with unknown outcome. Insufficient information is available<br />
for reliable predictions. 5. Homoplastic mutations. PND or PGD is useless<br />
as 100% <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA is mutated.<br />
In conclusion, assessment <strong>of</strong> mtDNA mutation load in chorionic villi,<br />
amniotic cells or blastocysts is quite accurate nowadays and prelimi-