24.08.2013 Views

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Concurrent Symposia<br />

invariable in the healthy populations, but increased in these cancerprone<br />

individuals (p=0.01). Expanding on the initial analysis and using<br />

multiple algorithms and a replication cohort <strong>of</strong> LFS DNA (n=22) hybridized<br />

on Affymetrix 6.0GW high resolution arrays we now demonstrate<br />

that: 1) CNV deletions are more frequent than duplications in mutation<br />

carriers (p=3.28 x 10 5 ); 2) the overall number <strong>of</strong> CNVs exceeds 300<br />

in carriers (154 in controls); and 3) the difference in CNVs persists in<br />

these individuals’ tumors. We have also recently uncovered rare CNV<br />

deletions at 17p13.1 in LFS patients (n=4) and in patients with multiple<br />

congenital abnormalities but no cancer phenotype (n=4). This led us<br />

to posit that structural features <strong>of</strong> specific CNVs in the region may<br />

play a role in distinguishing a cancer from a non-cancer phenotype.<br />

The CNVs at 17p13.1 all include TP53 but range in size from 4.236<br />

to 2Mbp. The large deletions, causing happloinsufficiency <strong>of</strong> nearly 40<br />

genes, are associated with a broad phenotype that includes multiple<br />

congenital abnormalities, while smaller focal TP53 deletions (from exons<br />

2 to 11) are associated with cancer susceptibility. Using qPCR and<br />

long-range PCR, we continue to fine map these deletions with the goal<br />

<strong>of</strong> finding the sequence features and mechanisms which cause these<br />

large genomic events (e.g. LCR-mediated NAHR). Our results suggest<br />

an important role <strong>of</strong> DNA structural variation in cancer susceptibility,<br />

and these models will be discussed during this presentation.<br />

s08.3<br />

Familial gastric cancer<br />

C. Caldas;<br />

Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Dep.<strong>of</strong> Oncology, Functional<br />

Breast Cancer Genomics Lab, Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />

No abstract received as per date <strong>of</strong> printing. Please see www.eshg.<br />

org/eshg<strong>2009</strong> for updates.<br />

s09.1<br />

molecular karyotyping: From postnatal to preimplantation<br />

genetic diagnosis?<br />

J. Vermeesch;<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Genetics</strong>, Afdeling CME-UZ, Leuven, Belgium.<br />

Molecular karyotyping or genome wide array CGH has been implemented<br />

in postnatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> patients with idiopathic mental retardation<br />

and congenital anomalies and is challenging conventional<br />

karyotyping as the prime diagnostic tool. Despite its successes, interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the results coming from arrays with ever increasing resolution<br />

is becoming the main challenge. I will demonstrate how “Mendelian<br />

copy number variants” - apparently benign CNVs that can cause a<br />

disease phenotype dependent on copy number state, sex and genetic<br />

or environmental background - require large scale collaborative efforts<br />

to collect sufficient data and the development <strong>of</strong> expert systems to<br />

provide accurate diagnosis. The technology has, more recently, been<br />

applied in a prenatal diagnostic setting. I will illustrate how the technology<br />

helps prenatal diagnosis, but also demonstrate the potential risks<br />

<strong>of</strong> using this technology. Finally, we developed a novel tool to genome<br />

wide screen CNV and SNP-genotype single cells. When applied to<br />

cleavage stage embryos from young fertile couples we discovered,<br />

unexpectedly, an extremely high incidence <strong>of</strong> chromosomal instability,<br />

a hallmark <strong>of</strong> tumorigenesis. Not only mosaicisms for whole chromosome<br />

aneuploidies and uniparental disomies but also frequent segmental<br />

deletions, duplications and amplifications that were reciprocal<br />

in sister blastomeres were detected in most cleavage stage embryos<br />

implying the occurrence <strong>of</strong> breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. As a consequence,<br />

PGD-AS will not improve the selection <strong>of</strong> genetically normal<br />

embryos. This not only explains the low human fecundity but also<br />

identifies postzygotic chromosomal instability as a leading cause <strong>of</strong><br />

constitutional chromosomal disorders.<br />

s09.2<br />

Prenatal diagnosis and fetal treatment using fetal RNA in<br />

maternal body fluids<br />

D. Bianchi;<br />

Tufts Medical Center, <strong>Genetics</strong>, Boston, MA, United States.<br />

Cell-free fetal (cff) DNA in maternal plasma provides a noninvasive<br />

source <strong>of</strong> fetal genetic material. Cff DNA is elevated in preeclampsia,<br />

placental abnormalities, and fetal aneuploidy. Qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

cff DNA in maternal plasma is already in clinical use worldwide for<br />

noninvasive prenatal diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Rhesus D and fetal gender. Excit-<br />

ing work has recently been published that suggests that cff DNA and<br />

RNA in maternal plasma can facilitate noninvasive prenatal diagnosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> trisomies 18 and 21, using ratios <strong>of</strong> single nucleotide polymorphisms<br />

(SNPs) or using a shotgun sequencing approach. In our laboratory<br />

we are performing comparison gene expression microarray analyses<br />

between the pregnant woman and her newborn to detect fetal gene<br />

sequences that are indicative <strong>of</strong> normal and abnormal fetal development<br />

in the second and third trimesters (Maron et al. J Clin Invest<br />

2007; 117:3007-3019). Amniotic fluid supernatant is also a rich source<br />

<strong>of</strong> cell-free fetal DNA and RNA; it can provide novel information about<br />

gene expression and functional development in the living human fetus.<br />

We have generated preliminary data on fetal gene expression from<br />

cell free mRNA in amniotic fluid. This has led to the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

novel differentially-regulated genes, and disrupted biologic pathways<br />

in various fetal pathologies such as twin to twin transfusion syndrome,<br />

fetal hydrops, and trisomy 21. Functional genomic analysis <strong>of</strong> second<br />

trimester fetuses with trisomy 21 suggests that oxidative stress, ion<br />

transport, and G-protein signaling are important. Most recently, we<br />

have used the Connectivity Map to generate testable hypotheses regarding<br />

fetal treatment with small molecule drugs. The Connectivity<br />

Map “connects” disease states, biological systems disruption (as measured<br />

by pathway analysis), and pharmaceutical compounds to treat<br />

the disease. This allows a true translation from bench to bedside, and<br />

suggests a possible continuum between prenatal diagnosis and fetal<br />

therapy. Supported by National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health R01 HD42053-06.<br />

s09.3<br />

the challenge <strong>of</strong> prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> mitochondrial disorders<br />

C. de Die-Smulders, H. Smeets;<br />

University Hospital Maastricht, Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Maastricht, The<br />

Netherlands.<br />

Mitochondrial diseases are caused by defects in the oxidative phosphorylation.<br />

They can be caused by mutations in nuclear or mitochondrial<br />

DNA (mtDNA) encoded genes. Mutation analysis <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />

genes in prenatal (PND) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is<br />

routine. Pitfalls do occur in biochemical analysis in PND. Mutations in<br />

the mtDNA lead to a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> diseases with very variable clinical<br />

expression. They are transmitted exclusively maternally and are<br />

usually heteroplasmic. Severity <strong>of</strong> symptoms is partially determined by<br />

mutation load. PND or PGD for mtDNA mutations is complex and experience<br />

is limited. Prerequisites for reliable PND <strong>of</strong> mtDNA mutations<br />

have been formulated by Poulton and Turnbull (2000) and include: 1.<br />

a close correlation between mutation load and disease manifestation<br />

2. no significant time-dependent changes in mutation load 3. a uniform<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> mutation load in different tissues. These criteria also apply<br />

for PGD.<br />

For genetic counseling one may subdivide the mitochondrial mutations<br />

in 5 categories: 1 de novo mutations. Recurrence risk is low and<br />

PND or PGD can be <strong>of</strong>fered for reassurance. 2. Inherited stable mutations,<br />

such as the m.8993T>G/C mutations (leading to NARP/Leigh<br />

syndrome). Outcome is favourable for this mutation when the mutation<br />

load is < 60%, while mutation load >90% is associated with a bad<br />

prognosis. Prediction <strong>of</strong> severity in the grey zone (60-90%) is difficult,<br />

but a tendency for percentages at the extremes has been observed<br />

in oocytes, which would favour conclusive results. PND was <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

more than 10 times. PGD for the m.8993T>G mutation has been reported<br />

once. 3. Inherited unstable mutations. The classical example<br />

is the m.3243A>G (MELAS) mutation. There is a certain correlation<br />

between mutation load and clinical severity but individual exceptions<br />

exist. It is impossible to define a completely safe lower threshold. A<br />

limited number <strong>of</strong> PNDs have been carried out. Mutant load was found<br />

to be fairly stable in CVS and amniotic cells. Oocytes and foetuses <strong>of</strong><br />

carrier women can be without mutant load, the number dependent on<br />

the mutation load <strong>of</strong> the carrier. PGD for the 3243A>G mutation was<br />

carried out by our group (unpublished results). Mutation load showed<br />

a broad range between embryos, but was equal in the blastocysts <strong>of</strong><br />

one embryo. Some embryos had a fairly low mutation load. 4. Rare<br />

mutations with unknown outcome. Insufficient information is available<br />

for reliable predictions. 5. Homoplastic mutations. PND or PGD is useless<br />

as 100% <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA is mutated.<br />

In conclusion, assessment <strong>of</strong> mtDNA mutation load in chorionic villi,<br />

amniotic cells or blastocysts is quite accurate nowadays and prelimi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!