24.08.2013 Views

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cancer genetics<br />

licular thyroid cancer (80-90%), which belong to group <strong>of</strong> tumors well<br />

prognoses and slowly progress and benignity. Very serious problem<br />

are recurrences and regional or remote metastasis. Progression from<br />

well differentiated thyroid cancer to malignant anaplastic carcinoma<br />

is possible also. In this focus, very important seems to be searching<br />

for molecular markers <strong>of</strong> disease course, good or poor prognosis and<br />

response on medical treatment as well. It is expected that polymorphisms<br />

research in genes demonstrating association with neoplastic<br />

diseases will be helpful in understanding <strong>of</strong> molecular mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

thyroid gland tumors development. The dependence <strong>of</strong> differential thyroid<br />

cancer occurrence on DNA variation: I157T in CHEK2 gene, R72P<br />

in P53 gene, 1007fs in NOD2/CARD15 gene and synonymic G2497T<br />

substitution in RET protooncogene was examined. 296 patients with<br />

differentiated thyroid cancer and 200 individuals from population group<br />

was examined. We used pyrosequencing technique. There were no<br />

significant differences in allele or genotype frequencies in analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

RET G2497T substitution and R72P in P53 gene but mutated allele<br />

frequencies <strong>of</strong> 1007fs and I157T was 8,95% and 4,9% in patients with<br />

thyroid cancer, compared with 2,92% and 2,1% in control individuals<br />

respectively. Our findings indicates that particular characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer risk genes on RNA level as well as DNA changes is necessary.<br />

Additionally a summary effect <strong>of</strong> different SNP changes as a cancer<br />

predisposing factor is possible, so further analysis will be performed.<br />

P06.032<br />

two cases <strong>of</strong> double heterozygotes in families with hereditary<br />

cancer<br />

L. Foretova1 , M. Lukesova1 , J. Hazova1 , M. Navratilova1 , P. Plevova2 , E. Machackova1<br />

;<br />

1 2 Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic, University Hospital,<br />

Ostrava, Czech Republic.<br />

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are tested in all familial or sporadic early<br />

onset breast and ovarian cases, which fulfil inclusion criteria. Two <strong>of</strong><br />

the CHEK2 gene mutations, c.1100delC and deletion <strong>of</strong> exon 9-10,<br />

are also tested as a last step <strong>of</strong> examination, in all BRCA1/2 negative<br />

probands. MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 genes are tested in cases <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

HNPCC syndrome. In one <strong>of</strong> our families both BRCA1 deletion<br />

<strong>of</strong> exon 20 and CHEK2 c.1100delC was detected in a proband with<br />

breast cancer at 44; her mother had breast cancer at 40 and ovarian<br />

cancer at 48. Proband has three daughters, one non-carrier, one carrier<br />

<strong>of</strong> CHEK2 mutation and one carrier <strong>of</strong> BRCA1 deletion. In other<br />

family originally tested for Lynch syndrome, MLH1 mutation (splice<br />

site) was detected in a proband with rectal cancer diagnosed at 58,<br />

whose father and grandfather had stomach cancer. Because his sister<br />

had breast cancer and mother had ovarian cancer, additional testing<br />

was provided and a BRCA1 mutation (protein truncating) was discovered.<br />

The occurrence <strong>of</strong> double heterozygotes is possible but probably<br />

rare. The clinical geneticist should carefully evaluate family history and<br />

indicate testing <strong>of</strong> additional hereditary cancer syndromes especially<br />

in probands with positive cancer occurrence from both parents. The<br />

preventive recommendations should be explained even in non-carriers<br />

<strong>of</strong> high-risk familial mutation. Supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Czech Republic: Grant MZ0MZO2005<br />

P06.033<br />

Novel variants <strong>of</strong> fusion gene transcripts in s<strong>of</strong>t-tissue<br />

sarcomas.<br />

T. V. Kekeeva1,2 , A. A. Ryazantseva1 , L. E. Zavalishina1 , Y. Y. Andreeva1 , G. A.<br />

Frank1 ;<br />

1Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation,<br />

2Sechenov Moscow medical academy, Moscow, Russian Federation.<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t-tissue sarcomas have specific recurrent chromosomal translocations<br />

producing chimeric gene fusions, which regarded as a major<br />

factor in the development <strong>of</strong> these tumors. Fusion <strong>of</strong> FUS and CHOP<br />

gene is a common genetic event found in liposarcomas. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

Ewing’s sarcomas are associated with fusion gene EWS-FIi1. These<br />

specific translocations can be used for exact diagnosis in poorly differentiated<br />

tumors.<br />

We examined 28 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sarcoma samples<br />

(20 liposarcomas, 8 Ewing’s tumors). Translocations were tested by<br />

FISH, characterization <strong>of</strong> fusion genes FUS/CHOP, EWS/FLI1 was<br />

performed by RT-PCR and sequencing.<br />

We observed translocations in 18/20 cases <strong>of</strong> liposarcomas and in<br />

8/9 cases <strong>of</strong> Ewing’s tumors. In 19/25 cases endogenous control B2M<br />

indicated adequate RNA quality. We found EWS/FLI1 fusion genes in<br />

3/8 Ewing’s sarcomas. In 2 cases ews exon 7 being fused to fli1 exon<br />

6, in 1 case ews exon 7 being juxtaposed to 10 ews exon following by<br />

fli1 exon 6 (novel fusion variant).<br />

We detected FUS/CHOP fusion gene in 45% (5/11). All cases had a<br />

type fusion transcript involving fusion <strong>of</strong> FUS exon 5 with CHOP exon<br />

2. Two novel transcript modifications were found, <strong>of</strong> which one had 6<br />

nucleotides insertion and the other lacked 14 nucleotides <strong>of</strong> CHOP.<br />

Moreover we found two different variants <strong>of</strong> the transcript in one sample,<br />

caused by alternative splicing apparently.<br />

Further investigation <strong>of</strong> structural attributes <strong>of</strong> fusion genes may be<br />

helpful for the prospective target therapy <strong>of</strong> patients with such fusion<br />

oncogenes and give insight into the malignant sarcoma development.<br />

P06.034<br />

Different genetic reasons <strong>of</strong> gastric cancer<br />

A. Tsukanov1 , A. Loginova1 , N. I. Pospekhova1 , T. A. Muzaffarova1 , L. N. Lubchenko2<br />

, M. P. Nikulin2 , E. K. Ginter1 , A. V. Karpukhin1 ;<br />

1 2 Research Centre For Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Moscow, Russian Federation, Cancer<br />

Research Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation.<br />

Mutations <strong>of</strong> CDH1 gene are associated with familial diffuse gastric<br />

cancer in some populations. MLH1 and MSH2 mutations also may predispose<br />

to gastric cancer.<br />

Three samples <strong>of</strong> patients for mutations and SNPs in the CDH1, MLH1<br />

and MSH2 genes were studied: 30 patients with familial gastric cancer,<br />

99 patients with sporadic gastric cancer and a control sample <strong>of</strong> 112<br />

probands by SSCP and sequencing.<br />

Mutations in gene CDH1 have not been found. We investigated our<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> familial gastric cancer and found 5 germline MLH1 and<br />

MSH2 mutations (16,6%). We have studied the significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CDH1 -160C/A variant in a promoter region for familial and sporadic<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> gastric cancer. The association <strong>of</strong> homozygote variant -160A/<br />

A with gastric cancer was shown for patients as with familial (OR=12,3;<br />

p=0,03) so sporadic form (OR=8,4; p=0,02). In addition it has been<br />

shown that the genotype 2076TT is associated with risk <strong>of</strong> a gastric<br />

cancer in a presence <strong>of</strong> a genotype -160CA for sporadic (OR=9,8;<br />

p=0,002) and the familial form (OR=12,3, p=0,009) but does not lead<br />

to the risk increasing in a presence <strong>of</strong> -160CC genotype. It is interesting<br />

that -160AC/2076TT genotype have not been found among 112<br />

healthy controls.<br />

In summary, mutations increasing cancer risk have been shown<br />

more frequent in MLH1 and MSH2 genes than CDH1. The genotype<br />

-160AC/2076TT <strong>of</strong> CDH1 has been certain for the first time as a risk<br />

genotype <strong>of</strong> gastric cancer.<br />

P06.035<br />

cDH1-160 polymorphism in Gastric cancer; could be an<br />

informative marker?<br />

A. Falahati 1 , M. Khoshsoror 1 , M. Karimpour 2 , Z. Soltani 2 , F. Jokar 1 , M. Jamali 1 ,<br />

R. Shahrokhi Rad 1 , F. Rezaei 1 , M. Fallah 1,3 , F. Mansour-Ghanaei 1 , A. Ebrahimi 3 ;<br />

1 Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Sciences, Rasht, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran, 2 Pasteure Institute, Tehran,<br />

Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran, 3 National Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology<br />

(NIGEB), Tehran, Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran.<br />

Introduction: Despite declining incidence rates, gastric cancer (GC) is<br />

a major cause <strong>of</strong> death worldwide and in Guilan Province, I.R. Iran.<br />

E-Cadherin is an adhesion molecule that is thought to be involved in<br />

gastric cancer patients. Polymorphism at position −160 C/A has been<br />

shown to affect GC risk in some studies.<br />

Material and methods: DNA was extracted from peripheral blood cells<br />

according to the protocols. E-Cadherin polymorphism at position -160<br />

C/A was investigated using PCR RFLP method.<br />

Result: Fifty-two cases (17 gastric cancer and 35 <strong>of</strong> their healthy 1st<br />

relatives) were included in the study. Allele Frequency was 90.4 % for<br />

C and 9.6 % for A. 84.6 % <strong>of</strong> cases were Homozygote (CC in 43 cases<br />

and AA in 1 case) and 15.4 % were Heterozygotes (C/A in 8 cases).<br />

A>C polymorphism was seen in 17.3 % <strong>of</strong> cases (in homozygote or<br />

heterozygote state). This have seen in 23.5 % <strong>of</strong> those with gastric<br />

cancer and in 14.3 %.<strong>of</strong> healthy one with gastric cancer in their 1 st<br />

relatives<br />

Conclusion: Polymorphisms in CDH1 have inconsistent relation<br />

with gastric cancer studies. In the present study, the CDH1−160C/A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!