2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cancer genetics<br />
the past and it is probably positioned in a hot spot point for mutations.<br />
The two different haplotypes reflects diverse historical origins in the<br />
east and west Castilla-León region.<br />
P06.121<br />
Detection and characterization <strong>of</strong> new large deletion <strong>of</strong> exon 3 in<br />
the BRCA gene among a French breast cancer family.<br />
D. Muller1 , E. Rouleau2 , I. Schultz1 , C. Andrieux2 , O. Caron3 , R. Lidereau2 , J.<br />
Abecassis1 , J. Fricker1 ;<br />
1 2 CRLCC P. Strauss, Strasbourg, France, CRLCC R. Huguenin, Inserm U735,<br />
Saint Cloud, France, 3Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France.<br />
Germ-line mutations in two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, are<br />
the major contributors to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Nowadays,<br />
large rearrangements have been described regularly in BRCA1 with<br />
approximately 10-15% <strong>of</strong> the mutations in this gene. In contrast, large<br />
genomic rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene have been rarely reported.<br />
During the comprehensive screening <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian cancer families<br />
for germ-line mutation in these genes, we detected a deletion <strong>of</strong> exon<br />
3 in BRCA2 in a breast cancer family, using the QMPSF (quantitative<br />
multiplex PCR <strong>of</strong> short fluorescent fragments) and confirmed by MLPA<br />
(multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) methods for detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> large genomic rearrangements. This mutation was characterized<br />
by high-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH technology which<br />
estimated the size <strong>of</strong> the deleted region and helped to find the breakpoint.<br />
Precise determination <strong>of</strong> the size and identification <strong>of</strong> the breakpoint<br />
were obtained with a specific PCR and the deleted sequence<br />
was different from previous reports. Moreover, analysis <strong>of</strong> transcripts<br />
revealed the only skipping <strong>of</strong> exon 3. Since this deletion is in-frame,<br />
the deleterious impact is largely discussed in the literature. Despite a<br />
limited number <strong>of</strong> cases in this family, the segregation data seemed to<br />
be consistent with a causal effect <strong>of</strong> the mutation.<br />
In addition to conventional DNA diagnostic testing by sequencing,<br />
familial breast cancer patients can benefit from searching for large<br />
rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene. The in-frame deletion <strong>of</strong> exon<br />
3 needs additional studies to investigate its contribution to hereditary<br />
breast/ovarian cancer.<br />
P06.122<br />
BRCA1/2 screening results: Review <strong>of</strong> molecular data<br />
concerning Portuguese high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families<br />
P. M. Machado 1 , S. Santos 1 , S. Fragoso 1 , S. Bento 2 , P. Rodrigues 2 , A. Luís 2 , A.<br />
Opinião 2 , F. Vaz 1,2 ;<br />
1 Molecular Biology Department - Portuguese Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Lisbon,<br />
Portugal, 2 Breast Cancer Risk Evalution Clinic- Portuguese Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology,<br />
Lisbon, Portugal.<br />
Introduction: Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the genes most frequently<br />
involved in familial aggregation <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian cancer, mutations<br />
in other genes like TP53, PTEN, ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 could<br />
also cause breast cancer risks. Taken together, the known susceptibility<br />
genes account for less than one third <strong>of</strong> breast cancer families<br />
undergoing genetic testing while other gene defects remain to be discovered<br />
[EMQN guidelines 2007].<br />
Patients and methods: Review <strong>of</strong> all patients for whom BRCA1/2<br />
screening is complete. All patients underwent pre and post-test counselling<br />
and are pre-screened for the BRCA2 Portuguese founder mutation<br />
[Machado et al, 2007]. Negative patients are further analysed by<br />
CSCE and samples with a different pattern are sequenced. Previous to<br />
the CSCE optimization, DNA samples were analysed by CSGE.<br />
Results: Two hundred and forty nine families were fully screened for<br />
BRCA1/2 mutations and 61 positive patients were detected (10 BRCA1<br />
and 51 BRCA2 mutations, including 28 families with the founder mutation),<br />
which corresponds to a 25% detection rate. The range <strong>of</strong> mutations<br />
and sequence variants as well as their frequency in this set <strong>of</strong><br />
patients were analysed, allowing for a better characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
breast/ovarian cancer high risk families from the Central and Southern<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Portugal. Depending on pedigree reanalysis BRCA1/2<br />
negative families are being screened for other gene mutations (p53<br />
and PTEN).<br />
Conclusion: From 249 Portuguese high-risk families, 61 presented deleterious<br />
BRCA mutations. As expected, several neutral or unknown<br />
variants were also detected, posing a significant challenge for counselling.<br />
P06.123<br />
Identification and characterization <strong>of</strong> large genomic<br />
rearrangements in BRCA , BRCA and CHEK genes<br />
J. Del Valle 1 , M. Nadal 1 , L. Feliubadaló 1 , R. Cuesta 1 , E. Tornero 1 , M. Menéndez<br />
1 , J. Brunet 2 , À. Teulé 2 , G. Capellá 1 , I. Blanco 2 , C. Lázaro 1 ;<br />
1 Programa de Diagnòstic Molecular de Càncer Hereditari, Laboratori de Recerca<br />
Translacional, Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat,<br />
Barcelona, Spain, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 2 Programa de Consell Genètic<br />
en Càncer, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat-IDIBELL<br />
(AT, IB) and Girona- IdIBGi (JB), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.<br />
Large genomic rearrangements are estimated to account for about 5-<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> all disease-causing mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in<br />
patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC).<br />
To screen for such rearrangements in patients with HBOC, and as a<br />
first step in our genetic testing workflow, we use MRC-Holland Multiplex<br />
Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). We have used<br />
this technique in a set <strong>of</strong> 310 independent patients and we have detected<br />
9 different copy number alterations corresponding to 3% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
studied samples and about 15% <strong>of</strong> all identified mutations in BRCA1<br />
and BRCA2 genes in our cohort. As commercial MLPA tests are not<br />
suitable to determine the specific breakpoints or to define the exact<br />
extension <strong>of</strong> the rearrangement, we have applied a set <strong>of</strong> different<br />
complementary techniques in order to better characterize these genetic<br />
alterations. We have used long-range PCR amplification, RNA<br />
analysis, SNP array chips, not commercial MLPA probes and FISH<br />
analysis to fully define the extent and mechanism <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the identified<br />
alterations. Briefly, in BRCA1 we have characterized 6 rearrangements:<br />
deletion <strong>of</strong> E22, deletion <strong>of</strong> E9-E24, deletion <strong>of</strong> E16-E23, deletion<br />
<strong>of</strong> E1-E13, deletion <strong>of</strong> E1-E2, duplication <strong>of</strong> E1-E2. In BRCA2 we<br />
studied a deletion <strong>of</strong> E15-E16 and a deletion <strong>of</strong> E1-E24 and in CHEK2<br />
we have identified a complete gene deletion. In addition, it is worth to<br />
mention that MLPA demonstrated to be useful to identify point mutations<br />
located within probe sequences.<br />
P06.124<br />
cost-effectiveness analysis <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis programme in women<br />
with a family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and cHEK2*1100delc<br />
heterozygosity in the Polish health-care system<br />
E. Orlewska1 , J. Lubinski2 , C. Cybulski2 ;<br />
1 2 Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Warsaw, Poland, Pomeranian Medical University,<br />
Szczecin, Poland.<br />
Aim <strong>of</strong> the study: economic evaluation <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis programme starting<br />
at 25 years old women with a family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and<br />
CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity versus no prophylaxis.<br />
Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was perfomed using modelling<br />
technique. Two cohorts were studied: without prophylaxis, and with<br />
prophylaxis. Data on life expectancy, breast cancer risk, efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
prophylaxis and medical costs were obtained from published literatures.<br />
The cohort simulation started with 25-year-old women and<br />
projected direct medical costs and outcomes over patients lifetimes.<br />
Effectiveness was measured as life years gained (LYG). Only direct<br />
medical costs (breast cancer prophylaxis and treatment <strong>of</strong> breast<br />
cancer I-IV stages) were included, assessed from health-care payer<br />
perspective and reported in PLN (1 EUR= 4.5 PLN in <strong>2009</strong>). 5% and<br />
3.5% discount rate was used for cost and effectiveness, respectively.<br />
Sensitivity analyses to treatment patterns, efficacy <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis and<br />
costs were performed.<br />
Results: The total lifetime costs/patient were estimated to be 4453<br />
PLN (discounted: 1318 PLN) in no prophylaxis arm and 5380 PLN<br />
(discounted : 2135 PLN) in prophylaxis arm . The life expectancy generated<br />
with prophylaxis was 75.43 vs. 70.5 for no prophylaxis (without<br />
discounting) and 48.01 vs. 46.79 (discounted), respectively. This<br />
results in ICER for prophylaxis <strong>of</strong> 187.7 PLN/LYG (without discounting)<br />
and 672.7 PLN/LY (discounted). Results were robust to sensitivity<br />
analyses.<br />
Conclusion: Breast cancer prophylaxis programme for women with a<br />
family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity<br />
compared to no prophylaxis improves survival and is highly cost-effective<br />
in the Polish health-care system.