24.08.2013 Views

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cancer genetics<br />

the past and it is probably positioned in a hot spot point for mutations.<br />

The two different haplotypes reflects diverse historical origins in the<br />

east and west Castilla-León region.<br />

P06.121<br />

Detection and characterization <strong>of</strong> new large deletion <strong>of</strong> exon 3 in<br />

the BRCA gene among a French breast cancer family.<br />

D. Muller1 , E. Rouleau2 , I. Schultz1 , C. Andrieux2 , O. Caron3 , R. Lidereau2 , J.<br />

Abecassis1 , J. Fricker1 ;<br />

1 2 CRLCC P. Strauss, Strasbourg, France, CRLCC R. Huguenin, Inserm U735,<br />

Saint Cloud, France, 3Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strasbourg, France.<br />

Germ-line mutations in two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, are<br />

the major contributors to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Nowadays,<br />

large rearrangements have been described regularly in BRCA1 with<br />

approximately 10-15% <strong>of</strong> the mutations in this gene. In contrast, large<br />

genomic rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene have been rarely reported.<br />

During the comprehensive screening <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian cancer families<br />

for germ-line mutation in these genes, we detected a deletion <strong>of</strong> exon<br />

3 in BRCA2 in a breast cancer family, using the QMPSF (quantitative<br />

multiplex PCR <strong>of</strong> short fluorescent fragments) and confirmed by MLPA<br />

(multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) methods for detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> large genomic rearrangements. This mutation was characterized<br />

by high-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH technology which<br />

estimated the size <strong>of</strong> the deleted region and helped to find the breakpoint.<br />

Precise determination <strong>of</strong> the size and identification <strong>of</strong> the breakpoint<br />

were obtained with a specific PCR and the deleted sequence<br />

was different from previous reports. Moreover, analysis <strong>of</strong> transcripts<br />

revealed the only skipping <strong>of</strong> exon 3. Since this deletion is in-frame,<br />

the deleterious impact is largely discussed in the literature. Despite a<br />

limited number <strong>of</strong> cases in this family, the segregation data seemed to<br />

be consistent with a causal effect <strong>of</strong> the mutation.<br />

In addition to conventional DNA diagnostic testing by sequencing,<br />

familial breast cancer patients can benefit from searching for large<br />

rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene. The in-frame deletion <strong>of</strong> exon<br />

3 needs additional studies to investigate its contribution to hereditary<br />

breast/ovarian cancer.<br />

P06.122<br />

BRCA1/2 screening results: Review <strong>of</strong> molecular data<br />

concerning Portuguese high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families<br />

P. M. Machado 1 , S. Santos 1 , S. Fragoso 1 , S. Bento 2 , P. Rodrigues 2 , A. Luís 2 , A.<br />

Opinião 2 , F. Vaz 1,2 ;<br />

1 Molecular Biology Department - Portuguese Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Lisbon,<br />

Portugal, 2 Breast Cancer Risk Evalution Clinic- Portuguese Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology,<br />

Lisbon, Portugal.<br />

Introduction: Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the genes most frequently<br />

involved in familial aggregation <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian cancer, mutations<br />

in other genes like TP53, PTEN, ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 could<br />

also cause breast cancer risks. Taken together, the known susceptibility<br />

genes account for less than one third <strong>of</strong> breast cancer families<br />

undergoing genetic testing while other gene defects remain to be discovered<br />

[EMQN guidelines 2007].<br />

Patients and methods: Review <strong>of</strong> all patients for whom BRCA1/2<br />

screening is complete. All patients underwent pre and post-test counselling<br />

and are pre-screened for the BRCA2 Portuguese founder mutation<br />

[Machado et al, 2007]. Negative patients are further analysed by<br />

CSCE and samples with a different pattern are sequenced. Previous to<br />

the CSCE optimization, DNA samples were analysed by CSGE.<br />

Results: Two hundred and forty nine families were fully screened for<br />

BRCA1/2 mutations and 61 positive patients were detected (10 BRCA1<br />

and 51 BRCA2 mutations, including 28 families with the founder mutation),<br />

which corresponds to a 25% detection rate. The range <strong>of</strong> mutations<br />

and sequence variants as well as their frequency in this set <strong>of</strong><br />

patients were analysed, allowing for a better characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

breast/ovarian cancer high risk families from the Central and Southern<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Portugal. Depending on pedigree reanalysis BRCA1/2<br />

negative families are being screened for other gene mutations (p53<br />

and PTEN).<br />

Conclusion: From 249 Portuguese high-risk families, 61 presented deleterious<br />

BRCA mutations. As expected, several neutral or unknown<br />

variants were also detected, posing a significant challenge for counselling.<br />

P06.123<br />

Identification and characterization <strong>of</strong> large genomic<br />

rearrangements in BRCA , BRCA and CHEK genes<br />

J. Del Valle 1 , M. Nadal 1 , L. Feliubadaló 1 , R. Cuesta 1 , E. Tornero 1 , M. Menéndez<br />

1 , J. Brunet 2 , À. Teulé 2 , G. Capellá 1 , I. Blanco 2 , C. Lázaro 1 ;<br />

1 Programa de Diagnòstic Molecular de Càncer Hereditari, Laboratori de Recerca<br />

Translacional, Institut Català d’Oncologia-IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat,<br />

Barcelona, Spain, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 2 Programa de Consell Genètic<br />

en Càncer, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Hospitalet de Llobregat-IDIBELL<br />

(AT, IB) and Girona- IdIBGi (JB), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.<br />

Large genomic rearrangements are estimated to account for about 5-<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> all disease-causing mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in<br />

patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC).<br />

To screen for such rearrangements in patients with HBOC, and as a<br />

first step in our genetic testing workflow, we use MRC-Holland Multiplex<br />

Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). We have used<br />

this technique in a set <strong>of</strong> 310 independent patients and we have detected<br />

9 different copy number alterations corresponding to 3% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

studied samples and about 15% <strong>of</strong> all identified mutations in BRCA1<br />

and BRCA2 genes in our cohort. As commercial MLPA tests are not<br />

suitable to determine the specific breakpoints or to define the exact<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> the rearrangement, we have applied a set <strong>of</strong> different<br />

complementary techniques in order to better characterize these genetic<br />

alterations. We have used long-range PCR amplification, RNA<br />

analysis, SNP array chips, not commercial MLPA probes and FISH<br />

analysis to fully define the extent and mechanism <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the identified<br />

alterations. Briefly, in BRCA1 we have characterized 6 rearrangements:<br />

deletion <strong>of</strong> E22, deletion <strong>of</strong> E9-E24, deletion <strong>of</strong> E16-E23, deletion<br />

<strong>of</strong> E1-E13, deletion <strong>of</strong> E1-E2, duplication <strong>of</strong> E1-E2. In BRCA2 we<br />

studied a deletion <strong>of</strong> E15-E16 and a deletion <strong>of</strong> E1-E24 and in CHEK2<br />

we have identified a complete gene deletion. In addition, it is worth to<br />

mention that MLPA demonstrated to be useful to identify point mutations<br />

located within probe sequences.<br />

P06.124<br />

cost-effectiveness analysis <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis programme in women<br />

with a family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and cHEK2*1100delc<br />

heterozygosity in the Polish health-care system<br />

E. Orlewska1 , J. Lubinski2 , C. Cybulski2 ;<br />

1 2 Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Warsaw, Poland, Pomeranian Medical University,<br />

Szczecin, Poland.<br />

Aim <strong>of</strong> the study: economic evaluation <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis programme starting<br />

at 25 years old women with a family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and<br />

CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity versus no prophylaxis.<br />

Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was perfomed using modelling<br />

technique. Two cohorts were studied: without prophylaxis, and with<br />

prophylaxis. Data on life expectancy, breast cancer risk, efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

prophylaxis and medical costs were obtained from published literatures.<br />

The cohort simulation started with 25-year-old women and<br />

projected direct medical costs and outcomes over patients lifetimes.<br />

Effectiveness was measured as life years gained (LYG). Only direct<br />

medical costs (breast cancer prophylaxis and treatment <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

cancer I-IV stages) were included, assessed from health-care payer<br />

perspective and reported in PLN (1 EUR= 4.5 PLN in <strong>2009</strong>). 5% and<br />

3.5% discount rate was used for cost and effectiveness, respectively.<br />

Sensitivity analyses to treatment patterns, efficacy <strong>of</strong> prophylaxis and<br />

costs were performed.<br />

Results: The total lifetime costs/patient were estimated to be 4453<br />

PLN (discounted: 1318 PLN) in no prophylaxis arm and 5380 PLN<br />

(discounted : 2135 PLN) in prophylaxis arm . The life expectancy generated<br />

with prophylaxis was 75.43 vs. 70.5 for no prophylaxis (without<br />

discounting) and 48.01 vs. 46.79 (discounted), respectively. This<br />

results in ICER for prophylaxis <strong>of</strong> 187.7 PLN/LYG (without discounting)<br />

and 672.7 PLN/LY (discounted). Results were robust to sensitivity<br />

analyses.<br />

Conclusion: Breast cancer prophylaxis programme for women with a<br />

family history <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity<br />

compared to no prophylaxis improves survival and is highly cost-effective<br />

in the Polish health-care system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!