2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
2009 Vienna - European Society of Human Genetics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cancer genetics<br />
Materials and methods: We have screened index cases from 65 highrisk<br />
breast cancer families for germ-line mutations in exons 2, 11 and<br />
20 <strong>of</strong> the BRCA1 gene. Mutation analysis was performed by direct<br />
sequencing using 14 primer pairs covering the coding sequences and<br />
their intron-exon junctions.<br />
Results: The founder mutations described in Ashkenazi Jews:<br />
5382insC in BRCA1 exon 20 was observed in 6 patients from families<br />
with multiple cases <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian cancer. Three <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
have developed both breast and ovarian cancer, two were with early<br />
onset, and one had both early onset and bilateral breast cancer. In<br />
addition we found one unknown missense alteration in exon 11, codon<br />
1037 (T>C), that leads to replacement <strong>of</strong> Val with Ala in patient with<br />
bilateral breast cancer developed by the age <strong>of</strong> 45.<br />
Conclusions: It has been known that Ashkenazi Jews 5382insC founder<br />
mutation is spread all over Central and Eastern Europe ant it is the<br />
most common in breast/ovarian cancer families from Hungary, Poland,<br />
Yugoslavia, Latvia, Italy, Spain, Greece and Russia. Our results suggest<br />
that the 5382insC might be also one <strong>of</strong> the most frequent mutations<br />
among breast/ovarian cancer families in Bulgaria.<br />
One unknown missense mutation in codon 1037 (T>C)<strong>of</strong> BRCA1 exon<br />
11 was also identified. The possible functional relevance <strong>of</strong> the mutation<br />
will be further studied.<br />
P06.112<br />
Descriptive study <strong>of</strong> French large rearrangements in BRCA<br />
gene involving the promoting area<br />
E. Rouleau 1 , A. Briaux 1 , C. Delnatte 2 , D. Muller 3 , S. Mazoyer 4 , L. Castera 5 , C.<br />
Houdayer 5 , F. Coulet 6 , V. Bourdon 7 , S. Krieger 8 , I. Bieche 1 , N. Uhrhammer 9 , A.<br />
Hardouin 8 , Groupe Génétique et Cancer Sein, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet 5 , R. Lidereau<br />
1 ;<br />
1 Centre René Huguenin, St Cloud, France, 2 CHU Nantes, Nantes, France,<br />
3 Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France, 4 UMR 5641 CNRS-Université<br />
Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 5 Institut Curie, Paris, France, 6 Hôpital Pitié<br />
Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 7 Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, 8 Centre<br />
François Baclesse, Caen, France, 9 Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand,<br />
France.<br />
The BRCA1 gene is implied in the breast and ovarian cancer predisposition.<br />
10-15% <strong>of</strong> deleterious mutations are large rearrangements<br />
involving one or several exons. In the French BRCA1 database, 28 out<br />
<strong>of</strong> 403 deleterious mutations are large rearrangements. The 5’ flanking<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the gene contains a BRCA1 pseudo-gene which could ease<br />
rearrangements. Up to now, only three large rearrangements involving<br />
the promoting area <strong>of</strong> the gene have been described in the litterature.<br />
In this study, we characterize 18 large rearrangements in this promoting<br />
region from French families with a zoom-in dedicated array-CGH<br />
(3107 oligonucleotides) and sequence the breaking points.<br />
We found 11 never described events from 6kb to 238kb. There were<br />
2 deletions from 5’ to promoting region, 13 deletions from 5’ to exon 2<br />
and 3 deletions from 5’ to other exons (exon 3, 17, full BRCA1). Two<br />
families have a rearrangement described in the literature (14kb and<br />
37kb). A deletion to exon 2 was recurrent in 3 families. Two involved<br />
only the promoting area <strong>of</strong> the gene and not the coding sequence (5kb<br />
and 209kb).<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the breaking points revealed some redundant break regions<br />
which could improve the understanding <strong>of</strong> those events. Thanks<br />
to the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the dedicated array-CGH, the analysis confirms the<br />
diversity and the recurrence <strong>of</strong> the large rearrangements involving the<br />
promoting area.<br />
P06.113<br />
the BRcA1/2 mutations and sNPs in ovarian cancer risk<br />
T. Y. Smirnova1 , N. I. Pospekhova1 , A. N. Loginova1 , L. N. Lubchenko2 , R. F.<br />
Garkavtseva2 , E. K. Ginter1 , A. V. Karpukhin1 ;<br />
1 2 Research Centre For Medical <strong>Genetics</strong>, Moscow, Russian Federation, Cancer<br />
Research Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation.<br />
Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer increased<br />
susceptibility to ovarian cancer. We analyzed BRCA1/2 mutations<br />
among ovarian cancer patients with familial history <strong>of</strong> breast/ovarian<br />
cancer and among unselected on familial history ovarian cancer<br />
patients. Among 101 unselected on familial history ovarian cancer<br />
patients in Russian population there were 17 cases with BRCA1/2<br />
mutations (16,8%). In order to find variants that may have influence<br />
on ovarian cancer risk three samples <strong>of</strong> patients on the base <strong>of</strong> mu-<br />
tation analyses were formed and analyzed: ovarian cancer without<br />
BRCA1/2 mutations, BRCA1-associated ovarian cancer and control<br />
sample. Several moderate penetrance cancer risk BRCA1/2 variants<br />
were investigated. It was shown that genotype 203A/A in BRCA2 gene<br />
was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk for both sporadic<br />
and BRCA1-associated ovarian cancer (OR=5,8; p=0,003). There<br />
was no confirmation <strong>of</strong> cancer risk modification by genotype 203A/A<br />
in a samples <strong>of</strong> patients with sporadic and BRCA1-associated breast<br />
cancer. The results demonstrate that defined genotype on SNPs may<br />
have influence on increasing ovarian cancer risk both sporadic and<br />
BRCA1-associated.<br />
P06.114<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> cHEK2 missense variant i157t on the risk <strong>of</strong> breast<br />
cancer in carriers <strong>of</strong> other cHEK2 or BRcA1 mutations<br />
J. Lubinski 1 , C. Cybulski 1 , B. Górski 1 , T. Huzarski 1 , T. Byrski 1 , J. Gronwald 1 , T.<br />
Dębniak 1 , D. Wokołorczyk 1 , A. Jakubowska 1 , P. Serrano Fernández 1 , T. Dork 2 ,<br />
S. Narod 3 ;<br />
1 Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland, 2 Hannover Medical School,<br />
Hannover, Germany, 3 Womens College Research Institute, Toronto, ON,<br />
Canada.<br />
Purpose: It is <strong>of</strong> interest to estimate the breast cancer risks associated<br />
with carrying two mutations because this information may be informative<br />
for genetic counselors and may provide clues to the carcinogenic<br />
process.<br />
Experimental Design: We genotyped 7,782 Polish breast cancer patients<br />
and 6,233 controls for seven founder mutations in BRCA1 and<br />
CHEK2.<br />
Results: Of the 7,782 women with breast cancer, 1091 had one mutation<br />
(14.0%) and 37 had two mutations (0.5%). Compared to controls,<br />
the odds ratio for a BRCA1 mutation in isolation was 13.1 (95% CI 8.2<br />
to 21). The odds ratio was smaller for BRCA1 mutation carriers who<br />
also carried a CHEK2 mutation (OR = 6.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 29), but the<br />
difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the odds ratio for<br />
women who carried two CHEK2 mutations (OR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.5 to<br />
10) was greater than that for women who carried one CHEK2 mutation<br />
(OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.1). The odds ratio for women who carried<br />
both a truncating mutation and the missense mutation in CHEK2 was<br />
7.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 56) and was greater than for women who carried<br />
the truncating mutation alone (OR = 3.3; 95% CI 2.4 to 4.3) or the missense<br />
mutation alone (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.9).<br />
Conclusion: Our study suggests that the risk <strong>of</strong> breast cancer in carriers<br />
<strong>of</strong> a deleterious CHEK2 mutation is increased if the second allele<br />
is the I157T missense variant.<br />
P06.115<br />
Preliminary genetic investigation <strong>of</strong> high-risk breast cancer<br />
patients in Armenia<br />
D. T. Babikyan, T. F. Sarkisian;<br />
Center <strong>of</strong> Medical <strong>Genetics</strong> and Primary Health Care, Yerevan, Armenia.<br />
Mutations in high-penetrance genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated<br />
with greater risk for developing breast cancer (BC). The benefit<br />
from prevention is not only increased by early detection <strong>of</strong> BRCA mutations<br />
in cases with strong family history, but also in early onset cases<br />
who make up a large fraction <strong>of</strong> all BC cases. This is the first report<br />
on preliminary results <strong>of</strong> high-risk BC cases in Armenia where the incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disease is the highest in the South Caucasian region. In<br />
2008, BC cases with family history or with early onset <strong>of</strong> the disease<br />
(before age 40 y.o.) consisted 6.3% and 25%, respectively, <strong>of</strong> all BC<br />
cases, with an increasing incidence <strong>of</strong> the latter during last two decades.<br />
In our pilot study we recruited 46 high risk BC cases (18 familial<br />
cases, 3 breast and ovarian cancer cases, 5 bilateral cases, and 20<br />
early onset cases).<br />
Using SSCP screening method, we have found 2 BRCA1 missense<br />
substitutions in 2 patients (Q356R, S694L) and one synonymous<br />
BRCA1 polymorphism in other 2 patients (L771L). This is the first<br />
report <strong>of</strong> S694V variant previously not reported in other populations<br />
in contrast to Q356R and L771L. It is notable that all carriers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
BRCA1 changes were early onset cases with no family history <strong>of</strong> BC.<br />
Despite the lack <strong>of</strong> high sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the screening assay, the results<br />
indicate a proportion <strong>of</strong> early onset BC cases with BRCA mutations<br />
and the need to include them in the genetic counseling and mutations<br />
screening procedure.