28.08.2013 Views

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120<br />

The Law does not include a section on purpose, although the long title refers generally to its purpose as<br />

being to “make provision for the disclosure <strong>of</strong> information held by public authorities”.<br />

The Law defi nes information simply as “information recorded in any form,” (section 84) which is held by<br />

the public body at the time the request is received (section 1(4)). It is understood that this includes any<br />

information whatsoever held by a public body, regardless <strong>of</strong> its form, status, date received and whether<br />

or not it was produced by the body. The Law also provides that information is understood to be held by a<br />

public body if it is held otherwise than on behalf <strong>of</strong> someone else, or if someone else holds it on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

the body (section 3(2)). Thus, public bodies cannot escape their obligations simply by getting someone else<br />

to hold the information.<br />

The main means under the Law for designating public bodies is through a list in Schedule 1, running to<br />

some 18 pages. The list includes all government departments, the various legislative bodies (the Law<br />

does not cover Scotland, which has its own law), 285 the armed forces and numerous other bodies listed<br />

individually by name. It does not, however, include the special forces, which are completely excluded from<br />

the ambit <strong>of</strong> the Law.<br />

The Law also provides that the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State may add to or remove from the list <strong>of</strong> bodies in Schedule<br />

1 subject to certain conditions (section 4), or more generally designate as public, bodies which “exercise<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> a public nature” or which provide contract services for a public body (section 5). A number <strong>of</strong><br />

section 4 orders have been made. 286<br />

Finally, publicly-owned corporations, defi ned as bodies wholly owned by the Crown or a public body other<br />

than a government department, are also public bodies (section 6). The Law also provides that where a<br />

body is designated as a public body only in relation to certain information, the obligation <strong>of</strong> disclosure is<br />

similarly restricted to that information (section 7).<br />

There have been attempts recently, in the form <strong>of</strong> the MacLean Bill, 287 to remove parliament from the<br />

ambit <strong>of</strong> the Law, but these were fi ercely criticised and now appear to be dead. 288 More encouragingly, a<br />

consultation was announced on 25 October 2007 to consider extending the scope <strong>of</strong> the Law to a wider<br />

range <strong>of</strong> private bodies performing public functions. 289<br />

The right to access information under the United Kingdom RTI Law is not limited by nationality or<br />

residence.<br />

Procedural Guarantees<br />

A request to access information must be in writing and specify the name and address <strong>of</strong> the applicant,<br />

as well as a description <strong>of</strong> the information desired. A request is deemed to be in writing if it is received<br />

electronically, as long as it is legible and capable <strong>of</strong> being used for subsequent reference (section 8).<br />

Although the Law does not specifi cally state that reasons are not required when making a request, this<br />

is implicit given that reasons are not included in the list <strong>of</strong> what must be provided. 290 Public bodies are<br />

required to provide such assistance to applicants, “as it would be reasonable to expect the authority to do”<br />

(section 16). The extent <strong>of</strong> this obligation is elaborated on in the Code <strong>of</strong> Practice adopted by the Secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> State pursuant to section 45 <strong>of</strong> the Law. 291 While the Code is not formally binding <strong>of</strong> itself, it is widely<br />

considered to be an authoritative elaboration <strong>of</strong> provisions in the Law which are binding. Public bodies<br />

must assist those unable to frame their requests in writing, either by directing them to bodies which<br />

can help them or, exceptionally, by reducing the request to writing themselves (paragraph 7). Where a<br />

request does not describe the information sought in suffi cient detail, assistance should also be provided<br />

(paragraphs 8-9).<br />

A public body must normally either provide the information or inform the applicant <strong>of</strong> its refusal to do so<br />

promptly and, in any case, within twenty working days. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating the twenty days, the<br />

time between informing the applicant <strong>of</strong> the fees to be paid and the date on which those fees are actually

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!