Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group to discuss the right to information. The Expert Group adopted a document setting out a number <strong>of</strong><br />
principles and guidelines on ‘freedom <strong>of</strong> information’, including the following:<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> information should be guaranteed as a legal and enforceable right permitting<br />
every individual to obtain records and information held by the executive, the legislative<br />
and the judicial arms <strong>of</strong> the state, as well as any government owned corporation and any<br />
other body carrying out public functions. 50<br />
These principles and guidelines were endorsed by the Commonwealth Law Ministers at their May 1999<br />
Meeting in Port <strong>of</strong> Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. At the same time, the Ministers formulated a number <strong>of</strong> key<br />
principles governing the right to information. 51 They also called on the Commonwealth Secretariat to take<br />
steps to promote these principles, including by assisting governments through technical assistance and<br />
sharing <strong>of</strong> experiences.<br />
The Law Ministers’ Communiqué was considered by the Committee <strong>of</strong> the Whole on Commonwealth<br />
Functional Co-operation whose report, later approved by the Heads <strong>of</strong> Government, 52 stated:<br />
The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the Commonwealth <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Information</strong> Principles<br />
endorsed by Commonwealth Law Ministers and forwarded to Heads <strong>of</strong> Government. It<br />
recognized the importance <strong>of</strong> public access to <strong>of</strong>fi cial information, both in promoting<br />
transparency and accountable governance and in encouraging the full participation <strong>of</strong><br />
citizens in the democratic process. 53<br />
The Commonwealth Secretariat has taken some concrete steps to promote the right to information in<br />
member countries. It has, for example, drafted model laws on the right to information and on privacy. 54<br />
International Jurisprudence<br />
Inter-American Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights<br />
In a 1985 Advisory Opinion, the Inter-American Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, interpreting Article 13, referred to<br />
the dual nature <strong>of</strong> the right to freedom <strong>of</strong> expression, which protected both the right to impart, as well as<br />
to seek and to receive, information and ideas, noting:<br />
Article 13 … establishes that those to whom the Convention applies not only have the right<br />
and freedom to express their own thoughts but also the right and freedom to seek, receive<br />
and impart information and ideas <strong>of</strong> all kinds…. [<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> expression] requires, on the<br />
one hand, that no one be arbitrarily limited or impeded in expressing his own thoughts. In<br />
that sense, it is a right that belongs to each individual. Its second aspect, on the other hand,<br />
implies a collective right to receive any information whatsoever and to have access to the<br />
thoughts expressed by others. 55<br />
The Court also stated: “For the average citizen it is just as important to know the opinions <strong>of</strong> others or<br />
to have access to information generally as is the very right to impart his own opinion”, concluding that “a<br />
society that is not well-informed is not a society that is truly free.” 56 Although the Court did not go so far,<br />
at that time, as to recognise the right to access information held by public bodies, it did provide a solid<br />
jurisprudential basis for such recognition.<br />
13