Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A zerbaijan<br />
Introduction<br />
Country Chapters<br />
Article 50(I) <strong>of</strong> the 1995 Azerbaijani Constitution provides: “Every person shall have the right to legally seek,<br />
get, pass, prepare and spread information.” The Law on Right to Obtain <strong>Information</strong> was signed into law by<br />
the President in December 2005. 160 This was preceded by a 1998 Law on <strong>Information</strong>, Informatization and<br />
Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Information</strong>, 161 which is mostly about how government should organise information internally,<br />
although it does create a right to access one’s own personal data, as well as a separate 1998 Law on<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Information</strong> which set out general principles relating to information but did not create a right<br />
<strong>of</strong> access. 162<br />
The law was developed by a working group which included both government and civil society representatives<br />
in what was a comparatively highly consultative process for developing legislation in Azerbaijan. It is a<br />
progressive piece <strong>of</strong> legislation which improved throughout the drafting process, demonstrating positive<br />
political will. It includes provision for an independent administrative oversight body (a sort <strong>of</strong> information<br />
commissioner), strong process provisions and extensive proactive publication obligations. At the same time,<br />
the regime <strong>of</strong> exceptions is overbroad, the Law lacks sanctions for obstruction <strong>of</strong> access and protection for<br />
good faith disclosures, and few promotional measures are provided for.<br />
Furthermore, implementation has been very weak. At the time <strong>of</strong> going to print, no information commissioner<br />
had yet been appointed although this should have been done by June 2006. According to a report by the<br />
Media Rights Institute, 163 no State body has yet provided for a registry <strong>of</strong> documents, as required by the<br />
Law, the information available on public websites falls far short <strong>of</strong> what is required under the Law and<br />
few public bodies have appointed information <strong>of</strong>fi cers. Signifi cantly, <strong>of</strong> 441 requests Media Rights Institute<br />
lodged with 186 different public bodies, only 125 were responded to at all, only 32 <strong>of</strong> the responses provided<br />
all the information requested, and only 17 did so within the seven working day deadline established by the<br />
Law. These are extremely poor results by any measure.<br />
43