28.08.2013 Views

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A zerbaijan<br />

Introduction<br />

Country Chapters<br />

Article 50(I) <strong>of</strong> the 1995 Azerbaijani Constitution provides: “Every person shall have the right to legally seek,<br />

get, pass, prepare and spread information.” The Law on Right to Obtain <strong>Information</strong> was signed into law by<br />

the President in December 2005. 160 This was preceded by a 1998 Law on <strong>Information</strong>, Informatization and<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Information</strong>, 161 which is mostly about how government should organise information internally,<br />

although it does create a right to access one’s own personal data, as well as a separate 1998 Law on<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Information</strong> which set out general principles relating to information but did not create a right<br />

<strong>of</strong> access. 162<br />

The law was developed by a working group which included both government and civil society representatives<br />

in what was a comparatively highly consultative process for developing legislation in Azerbaijan. It is a<br />

progressive piece <strong>of</strong> legislation which improved throughout the drafting process, demonstrating positive<br />

political will. It includes provision for an independent administrative oversight body (a sort <strong>of</strong> information<br />

commissioner), strong process provisions and extensive proactive publication obligations. At the same time,<br />

the regime <strong>of</strong> exceptions is overbroad, the Law lacks sanctions for obstruction <strong>of</strong> access and protection for<br />

good faith disclosures, and few promotional measures are provided for.<br />

Furthermore, implementation has been very weak. At the time <strong>of</strong> going to print, no information commissioner<br />

had yet been appointed although this should have been done by June 2006. According to a report by the<br />

Media Rights Institute, 163 no State body has yet provided for a registry <strong>of</strong> documents, as required by the<br />

Law, the information available on public websites falls far short <strong>of</strong> what is required under the Law and<br />

few public bodies have appointed information <strong>of</strong>fi cers. Signifi cantly, <strong>of</strong> 441 requests Media Rights Institute<br />

lodged with 186 different public bodies, only 125 were responded to at all, only 32 <strong>of</strong> the responses provided<br />

all the information requested, and only 17 did so within the seven working day deadline established by the<br />

Law. These are extremely poor results by any measure.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!