28.08.2013 Views

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey - Federation of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

paid is not counted. The Secretary <strong>of</strong> State may, by regulation, extend this period in respect <strong>of</strong> different<br />

classes <strong>of</strong> information to up to 60 days (section 10). 292<br />

A slightly different regime applies when a disclosure decision depends on a consideration <strong>of</strong> the overall<br />

public interest. 293 In such cases, the public body does not need to provide the information, “until such time<br />

as is reasonable in the circumstances” (section 10). However, the applicant must be notifi ed within the<br />

twenty days that the matter is still under consideration, and this notice should give an estimate <strong>of</strong> the time<br />

within which a decision will be made (section 17(2)). Where, after such a delay, the fi nal decision is not to<br />

disclose, a further notice must be sent setting out the reasons for this (section 17(3)).<br />

The RTI Law does not address the questions <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> requests or consultation with third parties directly<br />

but, rather, provides for elaboration <strong>of</strong> these matters in the Code <strong>of</strong> Practice pursuant to section 45. In<br />

general, where the information sought is held by another public body, the applicant should be informed <strong>of</strong><br />

this and <strong>of</strong> the contact details <strong>of</strong> that other public body. Where this would be ‘more appropriate’, a request<br />

may be transferred directly to another public body but only where that public body has been consulted to<br />

verify that it does hold the information and where objections from the applicant are not likely (or his or her<br />

consent to the transfer has been obtained). In this case, the applicant shall be informed <strong>of</strong> the transfer as<br />

soon as possible and the time limits start to run from the date on which the other public body receives the<br />

request (Part III <strong>of</strong> the Code <strong>of</strong> Practice).<br />

Part IV <strong>of</strong> the Code <strong>of</strong> Practice addresses the issue <strong>of</strong> consultations with third parties, which are highly<br />

recommended where the information relates to someone other than the applicant or where disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

the information is likely to affect the interests <strong>of</strong> a third party. Where the information has been supplied by<br />

another public body, that body must be notifi ed and where appropriate consulted, before the information<br />

is disclosed.<br />

Notice must be provided to an applicant <strong>of</strong> an refusal to disclose information, stating the exception which is<br />

being applied, the reasons therefore, and details <strong>of</strong> any internal complaints procedure, as well as the right<br />

to lodge a complaint with the <strong>Information</strong> Commissioner (section 17).<br />

Under the RTI Law, the applicant may specify the form in which he or she wishes to receive the information.<br />

Three different forms are listed as options for the applicant: in permanent or another form; an opportunity<br />

to inspect a record containing the information; or a digest or summary <strong>of</strong> the information in permanent<br />

or another form. The public body must provide the information in the form requested, as far as to do so is<br />

“reasonably practicable”, taking into account, among other things, the cost (section 11).<br />

The Law contains two separate systems for fees, one for ‘ordinary’ request and one which comes into play<br />

for more complicated requests. Pursuant to the fi rst, public bodies may make disclosure <strong>of</strong> information<br />

conditional upon payment <strong>of</strong> a fee and any such fee must be paid within three months (section 9(2)). Such<br />

fees must be in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State and these may prescribe that<br />

no fee is to be paid in certain cases, set a maximum fee and/or provide for the manner in which fees are to<br />

be calculated. Regulations adopted in 2004 provide that only the costs <strong>of</strong> informing the applicant <strong>of</strong> the fact<br />

that it holds the information and communicating the information to him or her (including reproduction and<br />

postage or other transmission costs), but no costs for staff time, may be charged. 294<br />

This regime does not, however, apply to the second fee system which, pursuant to section 12, comes into<br />

play when the cost <strong>of</strong> providing information would exceed such “appropriate limit … as may be prescribed”.<br />

The 2004 Regulations set this limit at £600 (approximately USD1234) for central government and parliament<br />

and £450 for the wider public sector. In calculating the costs, the time spent determining whether the<br />

information is held, and the time spent locating, retrieving and extracting the information may be charged<br />

at £25/hour (approximately USD54) (paragraph 4). The cost <strong>of</strong> multiple requests may be aggregated where<br />

two or more requests relating to similar information are received within a period <strong>of</strong> 60 working days,<br />

and are made by the same person or persons who appear to be acting in concert or in pursuance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

campaign. Where the costs would exceed the limit, the public body is not under any obligation to provide<br />

the information although, pursuant to section 13, it may still provide it and charge all <strong>of</strong> the costs noted<br />

above to calculate the limit, as well as the costs <strong>of</strong> reproducing and communicating the information to<br />

the applicant (paragraph 7 <strong>of</strong> the Regulations). The permissive language used means that section 12 is<br />

formally an exception which allows public bodies to refuse all larger requests.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!