08.09.2013 Views

Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) Best Practice Guidance

Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) Best Practice Guidance

Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA) Best Practice Guidance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Sequence of <strong>Audit</strong>s<br />

A site of employment may be assessed via a combination of the following methods:<br />

l Full Initial audit: Means the first time a site of employment is audited.<br />

l Periodic <strong>Audit</strong>: Usually a full audit used to monitor supplier sites on an on-going basis. The intervals<br />

between periodic audits may vary depending on the individual member.<br />

l Follow-up audit: Depending on the outcome of the initial audit, a follow-up audit may be required.<br />

Follow-up audits are normally used to check progress against issues found in the initial audit, and so<br />

may be of shorter duration than an initial or full audit.<br />

l Full Follow-up <strong>Audit</strong>: This term is used to describe a site visit when the extent of the nonconformances<br />

found at a previous audit was so broad that a full audit would be required to verify<br />

corrective action. In this case the methods and scope resemble an initial audit, but take into<br />

account previous audit findings.<br />

l Partial follow-up audit: The term used to describe an audit where the auditor visits a site but only<br />

checks progress against issues found during a previous audit. This should then be recorded in<br />

<strong>Sedex</strong> as a partial follow-up audit.<br />

l Desktop follow-up: Can be used for certain corrective actions where a site visit is not required<br />

and which are able to be verified remotely e.g. through photographic evidence or documents<br />

provided via e-mail.<br />

Note: Where an auditor re-visits a site to check all items of the labour code then this should be recorded as a<br />

full follow-up, and noted on the audit report.<br />

5.4 Labour Codes<br />

<strong>SMETA</strong> <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> (4-Pillar Version 4.0, May 2012)<br />

<strong>SMETA</strong> BPG has been developed to provide guidance for auditing against the <strong>Ethical</strong> Trading Initiative (ETI)<br />

Base Code and local law. In addition, the guidance can be adopted and tailored to carry out audits against a<br />

range of other labour codes based on the conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). However,<br />

in order to call it a <strong>SMETA</strong> audit the standard used must include the ETI Code / laws and the protocol must be<br />

in line with this BPG.<br />

Note: Since <strong>Sedex</strong> allows sharing of audit data, any company uploading a <strong>SMETA</strong> audit must exactly follow this<br />

<strong>SMETA</strong> <strong>Best</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> (BPG), especially ensuring that non-compliances uploaded on the system have<br />

been measured against at least the ETI Code and the law. Companies may use this methodology for a variety<br />

of codes, but it must not be called a <strong>SMETA</strong> audit unless it follows the BPG.<br />

Details of the ETI Code and the items to be investigated during a <strong>SMETA</strong> audit are found In Appendix A1:<br />

“<strong>Guidance</strong> by Clause”.<br />

11<br />

BACK TO CONTENTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!