18.10.2013 Views

ten dollars september 2007 - FMMG.com

ten dollars september 2007 - FMMG.com

ten dollars september 2007 - FMMG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2007</strong> BODY • WWW.<strong>FMMG</strong>.COM<br />

Nick and Victoria Monjo<br />

publisher’s statement<br />

MAGIC will be over by the time you read this. But as I write, we are preparing<br />

to visit a massive number of trade shows, all occurring on the same days, at the end<br />

of August. MAGIC, WWIN (which actually pre-dates MAGIC as a Vegas show),<br />

a pair of lingerie shows (Lingerie Americas and Curve), a Vegas version of the<br />

Accessories show, the Off-Price show, a swim show, a kids show....and more.<br />

The argument goes that because there are <strong>ten</strong>s of thousands of garmentos in<br />

Vegas, all at the same time, it is a perfect time to launch a new trade show. I guess<br />

that’s true, at least in part. But if you are like me, you must be finding it harder<br />

and harder to see it all. Hey, I was missing things when there were half as many<br />

events in town.<br />

What’s my beef?<br />

We just received our 2006 circulation audit statements from Verified Audit<br />

Circulation (VAC) for Fashion Market Magazine, BODY Magazine and Medical<br />

Apparel Magazine. These numbers prove what we have been saying about our circulations<br />

all year long!<br />

VAC, BPA and ABC are the leading, independent circulation auditing organizations<br />

in the U.S., and they verify for advertisers and ad agencies that publishers<br />

are telling the truth about the number of copies they are printing and distributing.<br />

Without an independent audit from one of the above-named organizations, it<br />

is impossible to know the real price of an ad. For example, if a publisher claims to<br />

print 10,000 copies and sells you an ad for $4000, you believe you are paying 40<br />

cents per copy. If it turns out that the publisher is actually printing only 2000<br />

copies, you are actually paying $2 per copy, or FIVE TIMES what you thought<br />

you were paying. You would be startled to find out how many publishers are playing<br />

this trick.<br />

Another subterfuge some publishers use – it’s a tip off, really – is to vigorously<br />

avoid discussing the number of copies they print and instead tell you how many<br />

READERS they have. The game here is to estimate some fantastically high number<br />

of how many people might be seeing each and every copy and then multiplying<br />

that number times the number of copies printed. For example, a publisher<br />

might select a self-serving estimate of six readers per copy. If he is only printing<br />

4,000 copies he could claim 24,000 readers. Remember to ask for an independent<br />

audit by VAC, BPA or ABC that shows the number of copies PRINTED each<br />

issue during the year.<br />

I call on lawmakers in every state to insist that all publications carrying advertising<br />

be required to have their circulations independently audited (a truly inexpensive<br />

process) in the same way the SEC demands independent financial audits<br />

from all public <strong>com</strong>panies. I also call on the attorney generals in every state to look<br />

into the matter of fraudulent circulation claims by slippery publishers, both here<br />

and abroad.<br />

Imagine the outcry if every McDonald’s quarter pounder sold in the U.S. last<br />

year was revealed, after billions had been consumed, to actually have weighed one<br />

eighth of a pound. McDonald’s would be in ruins and half the people in America<br />

would be getting refund checks.<br />

If you’ve spent money in a publication that does not have an independent circulation<br />

audit you too may be due a similar refund. – Nick Monjo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!