Celebrating 90 Years - Foreign Policy Association
Celebrating 90 Years - Foreign Policy Association
Celebrating 90 Years - Foreign Policy Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Good Diplomacy<br />
versus Bad Diplomacy<br />
96 | FOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION<br />
(Continued)<br />
We have all learned since 9/11<br />
that legitimacy comes from<br />
building credible partnerships<br />
around the world, above all via<br />
the United Nations.<br />
We have all learned since 9/11, in Afghanistan<br />
and Iraq and in Sudan and Congo, that legitimacy<br />
comes from building credible partnerships<br />
around the world, above all via the United<br />
Nations. It is easy to list the issues on which<br />
the United Nations struggles to deliver: Darfur,<br />
Zimbabwe, the Millennium Development Goals,<br />
inadequate pressure on Iran. But over a longer<br />
period, the United Nations brings legitimacy and<br />
achieves lasting results.<br />
Didn’t President Kennedy say that we should<br />
expect 25 countries to have nuclear weapons by<br />
the year 1975 and even more by the end of the<br />
century? Thanks to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation<br />
Treaty, which became possible only through the<br />
United Nations, the number of nuclear countries<br />
remains in single digits.<br />
After 9/11, the United Nations put in place a<br />
robust framework in international law to combat<br />
terrorism. This effort is making a difference.<br />
U.N. peacekeeping has brought many countries<br />
from conflict to stability and on to democracy,<br />
among them Namibia, Cambodia, El Salvador,<br />
Bosnia, Sierra Leone, and Liberia. Today the<br />
United Nations is operating in tough places:<br />
Afghanistan, Congo, Sudan, Nepal, Lebanon,<br />
and many other countries. The United Nations is<br />
working to replace violence with politics.<br />
When I joined the British <strong>Foreign</strong> Office,<br />
scores of countries around the world were run<br />
by nasty dictatorships. The Soviet Union gave<br />
a sinister legitimacy to repressive governments.<br />
Today the regimes that rule without serious engagement<br />
with their people are diminishing to<br />
an increasingly embarrassed minority. Even in<br />
countries such as North Korea, Burma, Zimbabwe,<br />
and Uzbekistan, the democratizing impact<br />
of new technology is making a difference.<br />
Consider China, a fast-modernizing country in<br />
which the power of cell phones and millions<br />
The Soviet Union gave a sinister<br />
legitimacy to repressive gov-<br />
ernments. Today the regimes<br />
that rule without serious en-<br />
gagement with their people are<br />
diminishing to an increasingly<br />
embarrassed minority.