24.10.2013 Views

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218<br />

Abstract: A detailed assessment of spray deposition and efficacy of 2 formulations of<br />

Bacillus thuringiensis was carried out as part of a control programme against Choristoneura<br />

occidentalis on Pseudotsuga menziesii and Abies grandis in Oregon in 1988. An analysis of<br />

covariance model that was used to examine the relationship between deposit density and field<br />

efficacy (larval mortality and defoliation) could not be justified, and the relationships between<br />

variables were investigated using chi-squared analysis. This paper was presented at a conference<br />

on pesticide formulations and application systems, held in San Antonio, USA, on 14-15<br />

November 1991.<br />

501. Risbrudt, C.D. and S.E. McDonald. 1986. How effective are tree improvement programs in the 50<br />

States? North-Central-<strong>Forest</strong>-Experiment-Station,-USDA-<strong>Forest</strong>-Service <strong>Research</strong>-Paper NC-RP-<br />

276. 6 p.<br />

Keywords: genetic tree improvement<br />

economics<br />

Abstract: Data were collected from all 50 State <strong>Forest</strong>ers on the extent and cost of activities<br />

in producing genetically improved trees for timber production, the use of State and Private<br />

<strong>Forest</strong>ry funds for such activities and the species being improved. Future timber volume<br />

attributable to genetic improvement and benefit/cost ratios were estimated. Only the benefits of<br />

planting on nonindustrial private forest lands are considered. Loblolly pine improvement<br />

accounted for 40% of the total annual expenditure of $4 million. Improvement of loblolly pine,<br />

Douglas fir, slash pine and ponderosa pine represented 80% of all expenditure. Analysis showed<br />

the high sensitivity of the benefit/cost ratios to the discount rate because of the long time before<br />

tree improvement benefits are realized. It is concluded, however, that the tree improvement<br />

programme is a logical public effort because of the significant long-term benefits of increased<br />

timber harvests.<br />

502. Ritchie, G.A. 1984. Effect of freezer storage on bud dormancy release in Douglas-fir seedlings.<br />

Canadian-Journal-of-<strong>Forest</strong>-<strong>Research</strong> 14(2): 186-190.<br />

Keywords: nursery operations<br />

tree phenology<br />

tree/stand health<br />

Abstract: Two-yr-old seedlings from 4 western Washington and Oregon provenances were<br />

lifted from the nursery on Dec. 11, 1979 and Jan. 21, Feb. 13 and March 11, 1980, following the<br />

accumulation of about 600, 1170, 1550, and 1800 chilling hours (temp. less than 5 degrees C),<br />

respectively. They were tested for bud dormancy intensity and vigour immediately after lifting<br />

and following 2 and 6 months in freezer (-1 degrees C) storage. Dormancy weakened<br />

exponentially with accumulated nursery chilling, with seedlings from all 4 provenances<br />

responding similarly. The rate of dormancy release was substantially retarded by freezer storage,<br />

so that by late March stored seedlings were more dormant than those remaining in the nursery<br />

beds. Dormancy weakened in storage more rapidly in high-altitude provenances than in<br />

provenances from lower altitudes. Early-lifted seedlings lost dormancy more rapidly in storage<br />

than did late-lifted seedlings. Vigour following a 6-wk greenhouse trial was good or excellent in<br />

all but the Dec.-lifted unstored seedlings and the March-lifted unstored and 6-month stored<br />

seedlings.<br />

503. Ritchie, G.A. 1986. Relationships among bud dormancy status, cold hardiness, and stress<br />

resistance in 2+0 Douglas-fir. New-<strong>Forest</strong>s 1(1): 29-42.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!