IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...
IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...
IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
treatments. Soil water loss in treatments where either soil surface evaporation was controlled by<br />
mulching, or where competing vegetation was controlled, was significantly less than water loss<br />
from the shaded and control treatments. Soil water loss in treatments with vegetation controlled<br />
by herbicide was significantly less than in treatments with vegetation controlled by scalping.<br />
Seedlings showed greatest growth with treatments that elicited the most efficient use of available<br />
microsite water either by reducing soil surface evaporation or vegetation competition.<br />
204. Folk, R.S., S.C. Grossnickle, P. Axelrood and D. Trotter. 1999. Seed lot, nursery, and bud<br />
dormancy effects on root electrolyte leakage of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings.<br />
Canadian-Journal-of-<strong>Forest</strong>-<strong>Research</strong> 29(8): 1269-1281.<br />
Keywords: nursery operations<br />
tree physiology<br />
tree/stand health<br />
photosynthesis<br />
growth<br />
tree phenology<br />
Abstract: The effects of seed lot, nursery culture, and seedling bud dormancy status on root<br />
electrolyte leakage (REL) of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings were assessed to<br />
determine if these factors should be considered when interpreting REL for seedling quality. The<br />
relationships of REL to survival, net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gwv) mid-day<br />
shoot water potential ( Psi mid), root growth capacity (RGC), and relative height growth were<br />
determined for each factor in experiments in 1994-95 in nurseries in British Columbia. Nursery<br />
culture had no effect on the relationship between REL and all other measured attributes. Seed lot<br />
affected the relationship between REL and Pn, Psi mid, and survival. However, critical REL (i.e.,<br />
lowest value associated with detectable root damage) and PS80 REL (i.e., level associated with<br />
an 80% probability for survival) were similar between seed lots. Bud dormancy status affected<br />
the relationship between REL and survival, RGC, and relative height growth. Control levels of<br />
REL, critical REL, and PS80 REL decreased as the number of days required for 50% terminal<br />
bud break declined. Thus, terminal bud dormancy status must be known before REL can be used<br />
to assess seedling quality. If the bud dormancy status of Douglas-fir populations is known, then<br />
critical and PS80 REL levels may be useful as indices of root damage.<br />
205. Fox, T.R. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization following fertilization of Douglas-fir forests with urea in<br />
Western Washington. Soil-<strong>Science</strong>-Society-of-America-Journal 68(5): 1720-1728.<br />
Keywords: fertilization<br />
soil properties<br />
Abstract: Nitrogen mineralization following repeated applications of urea fertilizer was<br />
determined in the A horizon soil from two stands of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)<br />
Franco] in the Cascade Mountains of Washington. Repeated applications of urea at rates ranging<br />
from 0 to 600 kg N ha-1 were made at annual and 5-yr intervals over a 6-yr period. Nitrogen<br />
fertilization increased N mineralization potential in these soils. However, soil N mineralization<br />
followed a quadratic relationship with the total amount of N applied in fertilizer over the 6-yr<br />
treatment period, increasing up to total application rates of 450 kg N ha-1 and then declining at<br />
higher rates. The decrease in N mineralization rates at the high N fertilization rates may be due to<br />
changes in the quality of soil organic matter, which reduced the effectiveness of extracellular<br />
enzymes and decreases the rate of decomposition and mineralization. Soil pH dropped following<br />
urea fertilization, with greater declines observed in the highest rates of urea fertilizer. Decreases<br />
91