24.10.2013 Views

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

IntensIve sIlvIculture - Forest Science Labs - Research Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

2 wk later than unpruned seedlings. Shippable yield of seedlings pruned tall and early and of<br />

unpruned seedlings were n.s.d, although more pruned seedlings had multiple leaders. Pruned<br />

seedlings were smaller than unpruned seedlings at the time of planting. Survival and growth were<br />

the same for pruned and unpruned seedlings in the 1st year after planting. Pruned seedlings grew<br />

more than unpruned seedlings in the 2nd year, but were still shorter after 2 yr. Field growth was<br />

greater in seedlings pruned tall or early than in seedlings pruned short or late. It is concluded that<br />

pruning should be continued as a cultural practice if it benefits nurseries, but that late short<br />

pruning should be avoided.<br />

160. Edgren, J.W. 1981. Field performance of undercut coastal and Rocky Mountain Douglar-fir 2+0<br />

seedlings. Tree-Planters' Notes 32(3): 33-36.<br />

Keywords: nursery operations<br />

tree/stand health<br />

growth<br />

Abstract: Seedlings from 1 seed source each of Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii<br />

(coastal) and P. menziesii var. glauca (Rocky Mountain) were grown in a nursery in Washington<br />

and half were undercut at 15 cm below the surface at 1-yr-old. Seedlings were lifted in March the<br />

next yr (1968) and planted out at 2 sites in Oregon. Survival of undercut coastal firs 3 yr after<br />

planting was significantly better than controls. Survival of Rocky Mountain fir was not<br />

significantly affected by undercutting. Ht. growth of control seedlings of both varieties was<br />

significantly greater in their 1st season than that of undercut seedlings, but the differences<br />

disappeared the following year.<br />

161. Edmonds, R.L. and T. Hsiang. 1987. <strong>Forest</strong> floor and soil influence on response of Douglas-fir to<br />

urea. Soil-<strong>Science</strong>-Society-of-America-Journal 51(5): 1332-1337.<br />

Keywords: fertilization<br />

thinning<br />

growth<br />

soil properties<br />

Abstract: Data from the Regional <strong>Forest</strong> Nutrition <strong>Research</strong> Project (RFNRP) in<br />

Washington and Oregon were analyzed to improve stand-specific prediction of Douglas-fir<br />

[Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] response to urea fertilization. The response variable<br />

(relative difference in volume growth between fertilized and control plots 4 yr after fertilization<br />

with 448 kg N/ha) was regressed against 28 stand and site variables (e.g., age, elevation, forest<br />

floor C/N ratio, soil cation exchange capacity, etc.) using stepwise multiple regression analysis.<br />

Data from 120 installations were stratified by thinning level (thinned or unthinned), geographic<br />

location (provinces), and site quality (site index and class). <strong>Forest</strong> floor C/N ratio was the<br />

dominant variable related to response. In thinned installations of high site quality (site classes 1<br />

and 2), 60% of variation in response was explained by the forest floor C/N, and 75% of the<br />

variation in response was explained with inclusion of surface soil exchangeable K. In thinned,<br />

low site quality stands, response was not as well related to forest floor C/N. Analysis of the data<br />

by province indicated that S may be limiting in southwest Oregon and P in coastal Washington.<br />

162. Edwards, D.G.W. and Y.A. El-Kassaby. 1988. Effect of flowering phenology, date of cone<br />

collection, cone-storage treatment and seed pretreatment on yield and germination of seeds from a<br />

Douglas-fir seed orchard. <strong>Forest</strong>-Ecology-and-Management 25(1): 17-29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!