Nonparametric Bayesian Discrete Latent Variable Models for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography J. D. McAuliffe, D. M. Blei, and M. I. Jordan. Nonparametric empirical Bayes for the Dirichlet process mixture model. Statisitcs and Computing, 16:5–14, 2006. D. McFadden. Economic choice. In T. Persson, editor, Nobel Lectures, Economics 1996-2000, pages 330–364. World Scientific Publishing, 2000. B. L. McNaughton, J. O’Keffe, and C. A. Barnes. The stereotrode - a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous-system from multiple unit records. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 8(4):391–397, 1983. E. Meeds and S. Osindero. An alternative infinite mixture of gaussian process experts. In Y. Weiss, B. Schölkopf, and J. Platt, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 18, pages 883–890. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006. E. Meeds, Z. Ghahramani, R. M. Neal, and S. T. Roweis. Modeling dyadic data with binary latent factors. In B. Sch ´ ’olkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hofmann, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 19. MIT Press, 2007. T. Minka and Z. Ghahramani. Expectation propagation for infinite mixtures. In NIPS Workshop on Nonparametric Bayesian Methods and Infinite Models, 2003. P. Muliere and L. Tardella. Approximating distributions of random functionals of Ferguson-Dirichlet priors. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 26(2):283–297, 1998. P. Müller and F. A. Quintana. Nonparametric Bayesian data analysis. Statistical Science, 19(1):95–110, 2004. D. Navarro and T. L. Griffiths. A nonparametric Bayesian method for inferring features from similarity judgment. In B. Sch ´ ’olkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hofmann, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 19. MIT Press, 2007. D. J. Navarro, T. L. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and M. D. Lee. Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50:101–122, 2006. R. M. Neal. Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9:249–265, 2000. R. M. Neal. Defining priors for distributions using Dirichlet diffusion trees. Technical report, University of Toronto, 2001. Apperaed in Valencia. R. M. Neal. Slice sampling. The Annals of Statistics, 31(3):705–767, 2003. R. M. Neal. Bayesian mixture modeling. In C. R. Smith, G. J. Erickson, and P. O. Neudorfer, editors, Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods of Statistical Analysis, pages 197–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. 130
Bibliography R. M. Neal. Probabilistic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto, 1993. R. M. Neal. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. Number 118 in Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, 1996. M. A. Newton and Y. Zhang. A recursive algorithm for nonparametric analysis with missing data. Biometrika, 86:15–26, 1999. D. P. Nguyen, L. M. Frank, and E. N. Brown. An application of reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo to spike classification of multi-unit extracellular recordings. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14:61–82, 2003. A. O’Hagan. Advanced Theory of Statistics: Bayesian Inference v. 2B (Kendall’s Advanced Statistics Library). Hodder Arnold, 1994. O. Papaspiliopoulos and G. O. Roberts. Retrospective Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for Dirichlet process hierarchical models. submitted, 2005. S. Petrone and A. E. Raftery. A note on the Dirichlet porcess prior in Bayesian nonparametric inference with partial exchangeability. Statistics & Probability Letters, 36: 69–83, 1997. J. Pitman. Combinatorial Stochastic Processes Ecole d’Eté de Probabilités de Saint- Flour XXXII – 2002, volume 1875 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, 2006. J. Pitman. Some developments of the Blackwell-MacQueen urn scheme. In T. S. Ferguson, L. S. Shapley, and J. B. MacQueen, editors, Statistics, Probability and Game Theory; Papers in honor of David Blackwell, volume 30 of Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, pages 245–267. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, 1996. J. Pitman and M. Yor. The two-parameter Poisson–Dirichlet distribution derived from a stable subordinator. The Annals of Probability, 25(2):855–900, 1997. I. Porteus, A. Ihler, P. Smyth, and M. Welling. Gibbs sampling for (coupled) infinite mixture models in the stick-breaking representation. In Proceedings of UAI, volume 22, 2006. F. A. Quintana. Nonparametric bayesian analysis for assessing homogeneity in k × i contingency tables with fixed right margin totals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443):1140–1149, 1998. C. E. Rasmussen. The infinite Gaussian mixture model. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, and K. R. Müller, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 12, pages 554–560. MIT Press, 2000. C. E. Rasmussen and Z. Ghahramani. Infinite mixtures of gaussian process experts. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 14. MIT Press, 2002. 131
Page 1:
Nonparametric Bayesian Discrete Lat
Page 4 and 5:
Matrizen mit unendlich vielen Spalt
Page 7 and 8:
Contents Zusammenfassung iii Abstra
Page 9:
List of Algorithms 1 Gibbs sampling
Page 13 and 14:
Notation Matrices are capitalized a
Page 15:
Symbol Meaning IBP Z binary latent
Page 18 and 19:
1 Introduction belief in the prior.
Page 20 and 21:
2 Nonparametric Bayesian Analysis b
Page 22 and 23:
2 Nonparametric Bayesian Analysis s
Page 25 and 26:
3 Dirichlet Process Mixture Models
Page 27 and 28:
3.1 The Dirichlet Process the perfo
Page 29 and 30:
α G o G θi x i N 3.1 The Dirichle
Page 31 and 32:
15 10 5 −0.5 0 0.5 2 1 G 0 0 −0
Page 33 and 34:
increment process with the correspo
Page 35 and 36:
α G o π k c i θk x i 8 N 3.1 The
Page 37 and 38:
3.1 The Dirichlet Process Eq. (3.21
Page 39 and 40:
number of components, K number of c
Page 41 and 42:
3.2 MCMC Inference in Dirichlet Pro
Page 43 and 44:
and Bush and MacEachern (1996). 3.2
Page 45 and 46:
3.2.2 Algorithms for non-Conjugate
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
∗ π ∗ π s 3.2 MCMC Inference
Page 57 and 58:
model can be written in the form of
Page 59 and 60:
−1 µ y Σy Σy D ξ normal R 3.3
Page 61 and 62:
the log likelihood term is: where a
Page 63 and 64:
3.3 Empirical Study on the Choice o
Page 65 and 66:
autocovariance coefficient 1 0.8 0.
Page 67 and 68:
# of data points # of data points 5
Page 69 and 70:
3.4 Dirichlet Process Mixtures of F
Page 71 and 72:
µ y Σy ξ R 0 ν w normal µ −1
Page 73 and 74:
ch1 ch2 ch3 ch4 3.4 Dirichlet Proce
Page 75 and 76:
3.4 Dirichlet Process Mixtures of F
Page 77 and 78:
# of components # of components # o
Page 79 and 80:
ch 2 ch 3 ch 1 ch 2 ch 3 ch 4 3.4 D
Page 81:
3.5 Discussion 3.5 Discussion In th
Page 84 and 85:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models matr
Page 86 and 87:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models In t
Page 88 and 89:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models α z
Page 90 and 91:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models α
Page 92 and 93:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models The
Page 94 and 95:
4 Indian Buffet Process Models colu
Page 96 and 97: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models Pois
Page 98 and 99: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models z α
Page 100 and 101: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models For
Page 102 and 103: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models ciat
Page 104 and 105: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models rati
Page 106 and 107: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models repr
Page 108 and 109: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models samp
Page 110 and 111: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models feat
Page 112 and 113: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models Algo
Page 114 and 115: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models mixi
Page 116 and 117: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models Figu
Page 118 and 119: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models pres
Page 120 and 121: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models ε
Page 122 and 123: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models LL P
Page 124 and 125: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models P+ P
Page 126 and 127: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models tEBA
Page 128 and 129: 4 Indian Buffet Process Models dist
Page 130 and 131: 5 Conclusions has been defined as a
Page 132 and 133: A Details of Derivations for the St
Page 135 and 136: B Mathematical Appendix B.1 Dirichl
Page 137 and 138: p3 α 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
Page 139 and 140: Construction of A Process B.4 Equal
Page 141 and 142: Bibliography D. Aldous. Exchangeabi
Page 143 and 144: Bibliography T. S. Ferguson. Prior
Page 145: Bibliography L. F. James and J. W.
Page 149 and 150: Bibliography Y. W. Teh, M. I. Jorda
show all

Nonparametric Bayesian Discrete Latent Variable Models for ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?