20.11.2013 Views

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chromium<br />

282. The WHO (2000) classifies Cr(VI) compounds as human carc<strong>in</strong>ogens<br />

by <strong>in</strong>halation exposure. They were unable to recommend an air<br />

quality guidel<strong>in</strong>e based on a safe level of exposure. A lifetime unit risk<br />

<strong>for</strong> lung cancer of 4x10 -2 per µg/m 3 <strong>in</strong> air was derived by averag<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

results of studies of four cohorts of chromate production workers<br />

(WHO, 2000). Extrapolation from this value by calculation equates<br />

excess lifetime risks of 1 <strong>in</strong> 10,000, 1 <strong>in</strong> 100,000 <strong>and</strong> 1 <strong>in</strong> 1,000,000 with<br />

exposures to concentrations of 2.5 ng/m 3 , 0.25 ng/m 3 or 0.025 ng/m 3 .<br />

The WHO note that only a proportion of the total concentration of<br />

chromium <strong>in</strong> air comprises Cr(VI) <strong>and</strong> that other <strong>for</strong>ms of chromium<br />

are not carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic.<br />

283. The USEPA Reference Dose (RfD) <strong>for</strong> chronic oral exposure to<br />

Cr(III) is 1.5 mg/kg body weight day per day based on a no observed<br />

adverse effect level (NOAEL) <strong>in</strong> a rat feed<strong>in</strong>g study (USEPA, 1998).<br />

This is an estimate of a daily exposure by <strong>in</strong>gestion that is likely to be<br />

without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects dur<strong>in</strong>g a lifetime. No<br />

<strong>in</strong>halation reference concentration (RfC) is available <strong>for</strong> Cr(III). The<br />

US EPA RfD <strong>for</strong> noncancer effects aris<strong>in</strong>g from exposure to Cr(VI) is<br />

3 µg/kg body weight day per day based on a NOAEL <strong>in</strong> a rat dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water study (USEPA, 1998). The RfC <strong>for</strong> non-cancer effects aris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from exposure to Cr(VI) <strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m of chromic acid mists <strong>and</strong><br />

dissolved Cr(VI) aerosols is 8 ng/m 3 based on nasal septum atrophy <strong>in</strong><br />

exposed workers. This is an estimate of an airborne concentration that<br />

is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a lifetime. The RfC <strong>for</strong> non-cancer effects aris<strong>in</strong>g from exposure to Cr<br />

(VI) as particulate is 100 ng/m 3 based on the results of a 90 day study<br />

<strong>in</strong> rats. The confidence of the USEPA <strong>in</strong> their RfCs <strong>for</strong> chromic acid<br />

mists <strong>and</strong> Cr(VI) dusts are low <strong>and</strong> medium, respectively. The same<br />

agency has estimated the unit risk factor <strong>for</strong> lifetime (lung) cancer risk<br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g from exposure to Cr(VI) to be 1x10 -2 per µg/m 3 <strong>in</strong> air.<br />

Concentrations of 8 ng/m 3 , 0.8 ng/m 3 <strong>and</strong> 0.08 ng/m 3 are extrapolated<br />

to <strong>in</strong>creased life-time cancer risks of 1:10 000, 1:100 000 <strong>and</strong><br />

1:1 000 000, respectively (USEPA, 1998).<br />

284. The USEPA <strong>and</strong> WHO unit risks are of very similar magnitude, <strong>in</strong><br />

spite of be<strong>in</strong>g based on different occupational studies.<br />

285. <strong>Defra</strong> <strong>and</strong> EA have not developed guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>halation exposures<br />

to chromium, but have set an <strong>in</strong>halation Index Dose to m<strong>in</strong>imise the<br />

risk of lung cancer aris<strong>in</strong>g from exposure to dust from chromium<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils. An Index Dose <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>halation exposure of 0.001<br />

µg/kg body weight/day was derived <strong>for</strong> Cr(VI) which represents “a risk<br />

level from possible exposure to a particular substance from a source”<br />

<strong>and</strong> is accompanied by an ALARP (as low as reasonable practicable)<br />

notation (also known as an <strong>in</strong>halation Tolerable Daily Intake) (<strong>Defra</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> EA, 2002). This is based on the calculated concentration of Cr(VI)<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!