20.11.2013 Views

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Guidelines for Metals and Metalloids in Ambient ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Beryllium<br />

4.3.6 Reproductive <strong>and</strong> development toxicity<br />

210. There are no studies of reproductive or development toxicity after<br />

beryllium <strong>in</strong>halation by humans or animals (ATSDR, 2002). A study<br />

on male <strong>and</strong> female rats <strong>in</strong>tratracheally <strong>in</strong>jected beryllium oxide, prior<br />

to mat<strong>in</strong>g, resulted <strong>in</strong> no consistent effect on reproduction (Clary et al.,<br />

1975). Limited effects were observed on the development of rat fœtuses<br />

when pregnant females were <strong>in</strong>tratracheally <strong>in</strong>jected with beryllium<br />

chloride <strong>and</strong> beryllium oxide: there was some <strong>in</strong>crease of fœtal<br />

mortality <strong>and</strong> decrease of fœtal body weight with an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal abnormalities.<br />

4.4. Evaluations <strong>and</strong> recommendations by other<br />

organisations<br />

211. Most animal experiments with airborne beryllium have <strong>in</strong>volved large<br />

doses <strong>and</strong> subsequently determ<strong>in</strong>ed lowest observable adverse effect<br />

levels (LOAEL) have been very much higher than those found <strong>in</strong><br />

studies on humans (USEPA, 1998; ATSDR, 2002).<br />

4.4.1 Chronic beryllium disease<br />

212. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the identification of CBD <strong>in</strong> the 1940s, the first<br />

occupational exposure limit (OEL) was <strong>in</strong>troduced by the US Atomic<br />

Energy Commission <strong>in</strong> 1949; an 8-hour OEL <strong>for</strong> beryllium was<br />

established at 2 µg/m 3 . This st<strong>and</strong>ard was not based on the risk of CBD<br />

but on the values used <strong>for</strong> other toxic metals (cadmium, mercury <strong>and</strong><br />

thallium); however, it was subsequently widely adopted.<br />

213. It became clear that while an OEL of 2 µg/m 3 resulted <strong>in</strong> a decrease of<br />

beryllium exposure it did not provide complete protection <strong>for</strong> workers.<br />

Subsequently a small number of studies have identified a human<br />

LOAEL; some of these are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 4.4.<br />

Table 4.4: Lowest observable adverse effect levels values from data <strong>in</strong> USEPA (1998)<br />

<strong>and</strong> ATSDR (2002)<br />

Study Beryllium source LOAEL<br />

Kreiss et al. (1996)<br />

Stange et al. (1996)<br />

Cullen et al. (1987)<br />

Cotes et al. (1983)<br />

Ceramic manufacture from beryllium oxide<br />

Nuclear weapons facility<br />

Precious metal ref<strong>in</strong>ery – beryllium oxide<br />

Beryllium manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plant – beryllium oxide<br />

0.55 µg/m 3<br />

1.04 µg/m 3<br />

0.52 µg/m 3<br />

0.1 µg/m 3<br />

214. Eisenbud (1998), us<strong>in</strong>g the earlier Lora<strong>in</strong> data, derived an OEL of<br />

0.2 µg/m 3 as the lowest concentration protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals from<br />

CBD. Employees at a copper-beryllium alloy factory did not, at crosssectional<br />

survey, have either sensitisation or CBD if they worked <strong>in</strong><br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!