SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

Actual Fragment Type(Percentage)
Actual Fragment Type(Percentage)
Table 7-9: Method 2 Results for the 1 st Testing Set (Half of Data Set 1)
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
Classification of each Fragment by Method(Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
No. 1609 0 0 0 0 0 1609
% 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 384019 0 0 0 0 384019
% 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 76 0 0 3386963 3387039
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 99.9978 100
No. 0 0 0 31692 0 0 31692
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 0 0 0 31214 31214
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.0000 100
No. 0 0 3981698 631732 0 108199364 112812794
% 0.0000 0.0000 3.5295 0.5600 0.0000 95.9105 100
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
Table 7-10:Method 2 Results for the 2 nd Testing Set (Data Set 2)
Classification of Fragment by Method(Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
No. 3277 0 0 0 0 0 3277
% 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 672922 0 0 0 0 672922
% 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 73 0 0 5971477 5971550
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0012 0.0000 0.0000 99.9988 100
No. 0 0 0 11677 0 0 11677
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 0 0 0 10668 10668
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.0000 100
No. 0 0 8244521 321139 0 348657357 357223017
% 0.0000 0.0000 2.3079 0.0899 0.0000 97.6022 100
Page
191