SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

Actual Fragment Type(Percentage)
Table 7-11: Method 2 Results for the unknown data set (Data Set 3)
Classification of each Fragment by Method(Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
No. 71 874 2736 945 0 308540296 308544922
%
2.30112E-
05
0.000283265 0.000886743 0.000306276 0 99.9985007 100
7.10.3 Method 3: Statistical approach
Table 7-12: Method 3 Results for the Training Set (Half of Data Set 1)
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
Classification of each Fragment by Method(Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
No. 1567 0 0 0 0 42 1609
% 97.3897 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6103 100
No. 0 384020 0 0 0 0 384020
% 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 1540682 0 0 1846357 3387039
% 0.0000 0.0000 45.4876 0.0000 0.0000 54.5124 100
No. 0 0 0 31693 0 0 31693
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100
No. 0 0 0 0 21866 9349 31215
% 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 70.0497 29.9503 100
No. 105821 2931512 6589250 404 4747223 98438585 112812795
% 0.0938 2.5986 5.8409 0.0004 4.2081 87.2584 100
Page
192