25.12.2013 Views

SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

same affect on other data sets. The alternative option would have been to<br />

accept all markers which are defined as valid by the JPEG specification. It is<br />

possible that whilst in the data sets collected by this research all JPEG visual<br />

thumbnails conform to the marker list and positions documented in table 8.1,<br />

other visual thumbnails may not; therefore this decision may exclude potential<br />

evidence. However given the size of the data set it is also possible that the<br />

visual thumbnails use a sub-set of markers as observed during this research.<br />

Further research into visual thumbnail markers would be required to ascertain<br />

whether the identification method should use the values observed during this<br />

research or accept any marker which is valid in the specification.<br />

The hybrid approach significantly improved identification and produced logs<br />

which show the reasoning for accepting or rejecting each fragment. Neither the<br />

methods in the comparative study nor the hybrid approach achieved high<br />

classification rates for image-only fragments. Since image-only thumbnail cache<br />

fragments have similar characteristics to standard image fragments it would be<br />

difficult to completely remove false positive matches. Since the aim of this<br />

research is to identify fragments which can be used for the reassembly research<br />

in Chapter 9 then a requirement is to maximise the identification of thumbnail<br />

cache file fragments whilst minimising false positives. Table 8.8 shows the<br />

success and false positive rate of the hybrid approach.<br />

This research highlights the improved identification of file fragment information<br />

by understanding the structure of each fragment classification and by combining<br />

methods. Unique characteristics identified for each classification may not be<br />

unique when implemented and tested against a large data set; with the variety<br />

of possible file fragment structures available it is likely that another file fragment<br />

type would also have the same characteristic. By combining multiple<br />

characteristics and methods for identification it is possible to reduce the number<br />

of false positive identifications whilst maximising the identification of fragments<br />

in the classification. The combination of approaches and breaking the<br />

Page<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!