SLAMorris Final Thesis After Corrections.pdf - Cranfield University

Actual Fragment Type (Percentage)
Table 8-6: Method 5 Results for the 2 nd Testing Set (Data Set 2)
Classification of fragment by method (Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
H
1
No. 3277 0 0 0 0 0 3277
% 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100
H
2
No. 0 672922 0 0 0 0 672922
% 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100
H
3
No. 0 0 5163582 0 102984 704984 5971550
% 0.00 0.00 86.46 0.00 1.72 11.80 100
H
4
No. 0 0 0 11673 0 0 11677
% 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.96 0.00 0.00 100
H
5
No. 0 0 644 0 8755 1269 10668
% 0.00 0.00 6.03 0.00 82.06 11.89 100
H
6
No. 0 0 10933051 1363 17589760 328698843 357223017
% 0.00 0.00 3.06 0.00 4.92 92.01 100
Table 8-7: Method 5 Results for the unknown data set (Data Set 3)
Classification of fragment by method (Percentage)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Total
No. 71 874 2542 932 60974 308479529 308544922
% 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.019 99.97
Page
225