Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
Physical fitness of elite women's rugby union players over a ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.4.1 Body Mass<br />
There has been a marked increase in the body mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>rugby</strong> <strong>players</strong> following the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism due to selection pressure towards physiques that best match<br />
the requirements <strong>of</strong> the sport (Quarrie & Hopkins, 2007). The 1999 Rugby World Cup lends<br />
support to this conception as the most successful teams had greater mass in the forwards<br />
(Duthie at al., 2006). A greater body mass confers an advantage in the contact phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sport, because <strong>of</strong> the great momentum <strong>players</strong> are able to generate (Quarrie & Hopkins, 2007).<br />
An increased focus on weight training and usage <strong>of</strong> nutritional supplements may also have<br />
contributed to the increase changes in body mass (Duthie et al., 2003).<br />
Numerous studies have shown that there is a distinction between forwards and backs with<br />
respect to body mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>elite</strong> (Duthie et al., 2006; Meir & Halliday, 2005; Quarrie & Hopkins,<br />
2007), amateur (Maud, 1983; Quarrie et al., 1995), adolescent (Deutsch et al., 1998; Durandt<br />
et al., 2006) and female <strong>rugby</strong> <strong>players</strong> (Gabbett, 2007; Kirby & Reilly, 1993; Quarrie et al.,<br />
1995; Schick, Molloy, & Wiley, 2008). Amongst the 2006 Women’s Rugby Union <strong>players</strong>,<br />
the forwards (80.17 ± 10.10 kg) were significantly heavier that the backs (68.03 ± 10.10 kg)<br />
which is comparable to <strong>elite</strong> women’s <strong>rugby</strong> league forwards and backs (74.5 ± 12.5 kg vs.<br />
64.7 ± 7.6 kg) (Gabbett, 2007; Schick et al., 2008) (Table I). Differences in body mass have<br />
also been observed within the forwards and backs between U/16 and U/18 South African<br />
<strong>rugby</strong> <strong>union</strong> <strong>players</strong> (Durandt et al., 2006). Sixteen year old <strong>players</strong> weighing significantly<br />
less than the 18-year-old <strong>players</strong> (76.5 ± 8.2 vs. 84.9 ± 8.3 kg) with the props being the<br />
heaviest and scrumhalves the lightest in both age groups .<br />
23