25.12.2013 Views

View - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

View - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

View - eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Only a third <strong>of</strong> the respondents felt that this English history was important in Key Stage 1.<br />

58% <strong>of</strong> respondents regarded British history as important in their own teaching. Only 44%<br />

regarded it as important at Key Stage 2 and 42 gave this rating for Key Stage 1. Scottish and<br />

Welsh history ratings were comparable, if slightly lower than those given for an Irish<br />

dimension. However, the main impression given is that most respondents did not regard<br />

regional diversity as important. The reasons for the overall differences between primary and<br />

secondary responses need some explanation. It can reasonably be speculated that it reflects<br />

differences in subject expertise. It could also reflect different approaches to the curriculum<br />

between respondents working in primary and secondary contexts.<br />

What were perceptions <strong>of</strong> multicultural and Irish dimensions in the primary school case<br />

studies? Table 9 shows virtually no evidence <strong>of</strong> links between multicultural and Irish<br />

dimensions in Case Study 4. Similarly, in Case Study 5 only nine out <strong>of</strong> 48 believed that both<br />

multicultural and Irish dimensions had at least some importance within Key Stage 2 in their<br />

schools. The overwhelming majority felt that a multicultural dimension had some importance<br />

but did not consider this to be the case for an Irish dimension. Over half <strong>of</strong> Case Study 4 and<br />

approximately a quarter <strong>of</strong> Case Study 5 respondents did not consider either multicultural or<br />

Irish dimensions important within their own teaching or in either key stage. This suggests that<br />

primary respondents felt less strongly about these dimensions than those in the secondary case<br />

studies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!