il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...
il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...
il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
significantly decreased when compared to both ADR and CONT gloups (Fig.18). The<br />
tre<strong>at</strong>ment with I pM retinoic acid resulted in a 65Yo increase in <strong>the</strong> total RAR receptor<br />
levels when compared to <strong>the</strong> ADR goup. The total RXR receptor levels in this goup<br />
were found to be unchanged when compared to <strong>the</strong> CONT group. The RARIRXR r<strong>at</strong>io<br />
was increased by 65Yo as compared to <strong>the</strong> CONT group.<br />
ILu2. 9uM Adtiamvcin TreaÍment<br />
Adriamycin (B pM) caused a 50Yo decrease in <strong>the</strong> total RAR and no change in <strong>the</strong><br />
RXR receptor levels when compared to <strong>the</strong> CONT group (Fig. 16 and 17). The changes<br />
v,'ere accompanied by a 45Yo decrease in <strong>the</strong> RAR/RXR r<strong>at</strong>io (Fig. 18). In <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong><br />
trolo:i; <strong>the</strong> depressive effect <strong>of</strong> adriamycin on <strong>the</strong> total RAR was diminished and <strong>the</strong>re<br />
was no change in RXR. This resulted in significant depression <strong>of</strong> RAR/RXR receptor<br />
r<strong>at</strong>io when compared to ADR and this r<strong>at</strong>io was still depressed when compared to CONT.<br />
Retinoic acid (0.1 t¡vt¡ and adriamycin (8 ¡rM) caused a significant decrease in <strong>the</strong> total<br />
RAR and no change in <strong>the</strong> RXR receptor levels (Fig 16 and 17) while <strong>the</strong> r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong><br />
RAR/RXR was less than44Yo <strong>of</strong> CONT. (Fig 18). Tre<strong>at</strong>ment with 1 UM retinoic acid<br />
and adriamycin increased both <strong>the</strong> total RAR and RJ(R receptor levels to over 200% (Fig.<br />
16 and 17). The r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> RARIRXR in this goup was significantly increased (I75%)<br />
when compared to ADR @ig 18)<br />
<strong>II</strong>.aS. 70 uM Adríømvcin Treafment<br />
The administr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> 10 ¡rM <strong>of</strong> adriamycin to <strong>the</strong> ADR group myocytes resulted<br />
in2IYo decrease in <strong>the</strong> total RAR and caused no change in <strong>the</strong> RXR receptor levels @ig.<br />
16 and 17) leading to a l08Yo increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR/RXR receptor r<strong>at</strong>io when compared to<br />
CONT goup (Fig. 18). The administr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> trolox to 10 ¡rM adriamycin tre<strong>at</strong>ed cells