26.12.2013 Views

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

il\VOLVEMENT OF RETII\OIC ACID II{ - MSpace at the University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IL b.7. RAR alPha recePtor levels<br />

The RAR alpha receptor levels were decreased to about 60Yoin response to 8 ¡rM<br />

and 10 ¡rM adriamycin tre<strong>at</strong>ment when compared to <strong>the</strong> control. The tre<strong>at</strong>ment with 4 UM<br />

adriamycin alone did not cause any change in <strong>the</strong> RAR alpha levels (Fig. 19), whereas<br />

<strong>the</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>ment with antioúdant trolox in cells tre<strong>at</strong>ed with 4 UM adriamycin resulted in<br />

ZZo/o decrease in <strong>the</strong> RAR alpha receptor levels when compared to <strong>the</strong> control. There was<br />

no adriamycin-induced decrease in <strong>the</strong> RAR receptor levels observed <strong>at</strong> 8 or 10 UM in <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> trolox (Fig. 19). 4 pM tre<strong>at</strong>ed ADR group myocytes exhibited 121o/o<br />

increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR alpha receptor levels when in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> 0.1 RA. However, <strong>at</strong> 8<br />

and l0 ¡^lM adriamycin concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> 0.I pM <strong>of</strong> RA caused a significant<br />

decrease in <strong>the</strong> RAR alpha receptors. Administr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> I UM retinoic acid to <strong>the</strong> same<br />

group caused significant increase in <strong>the</strong> RAR alpha receptor expression <strong>at</strong> all<br />

concentr<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> adriamYcin.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!