chapter 3 - RiuNet
chapter 3 - RiuNet
chapter 3 - RiuNet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 1<br />
On the contrary, the different magnification lenses used in this study<br />
significantly affected some of the sperm quality parameters in the different<br />
sperm classes (Table 2). Samples analyzed using the 20x lens showed lower<br />
values than those analyzed using the 10x lens, with more significant<br />
differences in C-II and C-III. In addition, the coefficients of variation within<br />
the same motility class (Figure 1) with the 20x lens were much higher than<br />
with the 10x lens, with much higher CV’s in C-I than in C-II and C-III.<br />
Table 2. Mean ± SEM of sperm quality parameters for different magnification<br />
lenses on different sperm classes (C-I, C-II, and C-III) at 30 s postactivation time.<br />
C-I C-II C-III<br />
10x 20x 10x 20x 10x 20x<br />
MOT % 18.5 ± 1.8 18.3 ± 2.3 42.2 ± 3.1 39.1 ± 3.8 63.8 ± 2.1 56.6 ± 3.6<br />
PM % 4.8 ± 0.9 5.0 ± 0.9 22.1 ± 2.3 18.6 ± 2.6 27.8 ± 2.0* 20.4 ± 2.3<br />
FA % 8.4 ± 1.2 7.9 ± 1.3 32.0 ± 2.8 25.1 ± 3.2 47.8 ± 2.5* 36.1 ± 3.6<br />
ME % 5.7 ± 0.7 4.6 ± 0.6 5.6 ± 0.6 7.3 ± 0.9 10.5 ± 0.8* 13.3 ± 1.0<br />
SL % 4.4 ± 0.5 5.9 ± 0.9 4.6 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 1.0 5.5 ± 0.4* 7.1 ± 0.7<br />
VCL µm/s 101.2 ± 4.6 89.2 ± 6.7 153.6 ± 5.1* 129.8 ± 8.6 152.3 ± 5.0* 129.4 ± 6.5<br />
VSL µm/s 39.3 ± 2.8 36.2 ± 3.8 74.9 ± 4.1 64.6 ± 5.7 72.2 ± 3.8* 59.2 ± 4.2<br />
VAP µm/s 58.3 ± 2.9 51.6 ± 4.3 94.6 ± 3.9 82.0 ± 5.9 95.4 ± 4.0* 81.9 ± 4.8<br />
STR % 66.4 ± 1.6 67.4 ± 1.8 78.4 ± 1.4 76.4 ± 2.4 74.8 ± 1.1 71.3 ± 1.7<br />
BFC beats/s 26.2 ± 1.2* 19.7 ± 2.6 35.7 ± 1.1* 31.1 ± 1.6 33.0 ± 1.1* 28.9 ± 1.2<br />
Abbreviations: BCF, beat cross frequency; FA, fast; ME, medium; MOT, total<br />
motility; PM, progressive motility; SL, slow; STR, straightness; VAP, average path<br />
velocity; VCL, curvilinear velocity; VSL, straight line velocity.<br />
3.2 Effect of frame rate setting<br />
The frame rate setting (FR) had no effect neither on the total and<br />
progressive motile cells nor on the proportion of fast, medium and slow<br />
spermatozoa (data not shown). However, other kinetic values were deeply<br />
affected by FR (Figure 2). VCL and BFC showed a progressive increase with<br />
significant differences as the FR increased while STR showed a reverse<br />
38