29.12.2013 Views

Pasha Bulker 243 - Independent investigation into the grounding of ...

Pasha Bulker 243 - Independent investigation into the grounding of ...

Pasha Bulker 243 - Independent investigation into the grounding of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

international reputation and reduce costs to <strong>the</strong> industry by sharing coal chain<br />

capacity proportionally amongst <strong>the</strong> producers.<br />

In April 2004, a capacity allocation system, authorised by <strong>the</strong> ACCC 13 , was<br />

introduced. Such a system, operating under different names, has been in place,<br />

intermittently, since <strong>the</strong>n. When an allocation system is in place, periodical coal<br />

demand nominations from producers and declared coal chain capacity are used to<br />

calculate <strong>the</strong> pro-rata reduction to each producer’s nomination. In simple terms, if<br />

<strong>the</strong> coal chain capacity is, for example, 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forecast<br />

demand, <strong>the</strong>n a reduction <strong>of</strong> 10 per cent is applied to each producer’s nomination.<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> coal sold, <strong>the</strong>refore, is intended to match <strong>the</strong> coal chain capacity<br />

and result in only <strong>the</strong> necessary number <strong>of</strong> ships arriving to load.<br />

A capacity allocation system lapses when <strong>the</strong> authorised time period is completed<br />

or a system is ‘voted <strong>of</strong>f’ by a majority <strong>of</strong> coal producers. Once a system lapses, reapplication<br />

for authorisation must be made.<br />

In September 2006, producers voted <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> capacity allocation system in place at<br />

<strong>the</strong> time. Depending on individual circumstances, some producers believed that <strong>the</strong><br />

allocation system was disadvantageous as it reduced <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>of</strong>its. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

producers considered that <strong>the</strong> system was unnecessary because <strong>the</strong> queue had<br />

reduced to 20 ships.<br />

In early 2007, <strong>the</strong> queue was, once again, more than 50 ships when PWCS, at <strong>the</strong><br />

request <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> coal producers, re-applied for ano<strong>the</strong>r capacity allocation<br />

system. In March 2007, when authorisation for <strong>the</strong> system was obtained, <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> ships waiting at anchor <strong>of</strong>f Newcastle exceeded 60. The queue persisted<br />

and, at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incident, <strong>the</strong>re were 57 ships in <strong>the</strong> anchorage.<br />

1.3<br />

The incident<br />

At 0605 on 23 May 2007, <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong> arrived <strong>of</strong>f Newcastle after a 12 day<br />

voyage from Japan. The 22 000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> water ballast on board was sufficient for<br />

good wea<strong>the</strong>r and all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ship’s water ballast tanks, except <strong>the</strong> fore and aft peak<br />

tanks, were full. All <strong>of</strong> its cargo holds were empty in readiness to load coal. The<br />

ship had sailed from Japan in a similar condition and completed a ballast water<br />

exchange, in accordance with Australian quarantine requirements, during <strong>the</strong><br />

voyage. It had draughts <strong>of</strong> 4.85 m forward and 7.10 m aft, which was slightly less<br />

than <strong>the</strong> 7.17 m aft draught necessary to keep <strong>the</strong> propeller blades fully submerged,<br />

at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rotation, in still water. The ship had on board 760 tonnes <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

oil and much smaller quantities <strong>of</strong> diesel and o<strong>the</strong>r oils to operate its machinery.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time, <strong>the</strong>re were 57 ships in <strong>the</strong> anchorage and <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong> was scheduled<br />

to berth on 12 June. Newcastle VTIC provided <strong>the</strong> standard advice for <strong>the</strong> ship to<br />

anchor south <strong>of</strong> 32º58’S and at least two miles from <strong>the</strong> coast. The master identified<br />

a vacant position in <strong>the</strong> congested anchorage, about five miles south <strong>of</strong> Nobbys<br />

Head, and manoeuvred <strong>the</strong> ship towards it.<br />

13 The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) administers <strong>the</strong> Trade Practices<br />

Act 1974 and o<strong>the</strong>r acts and is responsible for regulating and promoting competition and fair trade<br />

in <strong>the</strong> market place to benefit consumers, business and <strong>the</strong> community.<br />

- 8 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!