Figure 8: Section <strong>of</strong> navigational chart Aus 207 indicating <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong>’s track on 8 June 2007. Images (to scale) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ship, aligned to its heading at various positions, have been superimposed on its track - 17 -
At 0906, just as <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading returned to 140º, <strong>the</strong> master ordered it to 160º. In response, <strong>the</strong> helmsman applied nearly full starboard rudder and <strong>the</strong> ship’s head started to swing rapidly to starboard. The wind which had been ahead was now on <strong>the</strong> port bow. At <strong>the</strong> time, <strong>the</strong> master remarked to <strong>the</strong> chief engineer that a ship’s heading <strong>of</strong> 140º was ‘face to face’ with <strong>the</strong> wind and ‘not good’. As <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading approached 160º, <strong>the</strong> helmsman put <strong>the</strong> rudder amidships <strong>the</strong>n gradually applied port rudder as <strong>the</strong> ship continued to turn. By 0908, <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading was 180º and still turning to starboard with <strong>the</strong> rudder 27º to port. At 0909, with <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading at 200º and <strong>the</strong> rudder hard-over to port, <strong>the</strong> helmsman informed <strong>the</strong> master that <strong>the</strong> ship was still turning to starboard. The master told him that he should ‘take action quickly’ when steering. The ship’s course made good had now become westerly, towards <strong>the</strong> coast. At 0910, VTIC informed Santa Isabel’s master that <strong>the</strong> ship was approaching <strong>the</strong> restricted area which it should clear if it was safe to do so. The ship’s master was also advised that Sea Confidence nearby was experiencing difficulties. Santa Isabel’s master advised VTIC that <strong>the</strong> cable fouling his ship’s anchor would need to be cut to clear it. <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong>’s master heard this communication and remarked that both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ships were not close to <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong>. At 0912, VTIC informed <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong>’s master that <strong>the</strong> ship should leave <strong>the</strong> restricted area and go to sea. The master thanked VTIC saying that he was ‘proceeding to sea’ and ‘don’t worry’. On its 220º heading, <strong>the</strong> ship was rolling heavily, beam-on to <strong>the</strong> large swell and <strong>the</strong> wind and it began to approach <strong>the</strong> coast at more than 2.5 knots. From his cabin’s porthole on <strong>the</strong> ship’s starboard side, <strong>the</strong> second mate could see <strong>the</strong> coast. He had been unable to sleep since earlier that morning because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavy rolling. When <strong>the</strong> ship got underway, he had, briefly, been on <strong>the</strong> bridge and knew <strong>the</strong> ship was headed to sea. He did not understand why <strong>the</strong> coast was now on <strong>the</strong> ship’s starboard side so he went up to <strong>the</strong> bridge. At 0915, <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading was still south-westerly and it was making good a westerly course at 3.7 knots towards Nobbys Beach, which was only 1.2 miles away. The master asked for an increase <strong>of</strong> engine speed and <strong>the</strong> chief engineer <strong>the</strong>n left <strong>the</strong> bridge and went to <strong>the</strong> engine room to oversee engine room operations. As <strong>the</strong> engine speed was gradually increased to 77 rpm, <strong>the</strong> ship’s head finally swung to port with <strong>the</strong> maximum port rudder being applied. At 0923, <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading was approaching 180º when <strong>the</strong> helmsman reduced <strong>the</strong> rudder applied to 23º for a few seconds. The swing to port stopped and he immediately put <strong>the</strong> rudder hard-over to port again. By 0925, <strong>the</strong> ship’s head was turning slowly to starboard despite <strong>the</strong> maximum port rudder being applied and <strong>the</strong> engine speed at 80 rpm. The wind, at times, was now gusting to more than 55 knots. The master telephoned <strong>the</strong> chief engineer and asked for maximum possible engine speed. At 0927, VTIC called <strong>Pasha</strong> <strong>Bulker</strong>’s master to advise that <strong>the</strong> ship was getting closer to <strong>the</strong> coast and asked if any assistance was required. The master declined assistance, stating that in ‘about 10 minutes’ <strong>the</strong> situation should improve. As <strong>the</strong> engine speed increased, <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading, which had reached 205º, started to return slowly to port. At 0931, <strong>the</strong> ship’s heading was 185º with <strong>the</strong> main engine at 91 rpm and Nobbys Beach was eight cables (about 1500 m) away. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> - 18 -
- Page 2 and 3: ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION
- Page 4 and 5: CONTENTS DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMA
- Page 6 and 7: DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMATION Repo
- Page 8 and 9: THE AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT SAFETY BUR
- Page 10 and 11: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THIS REPORT Occ
- Page 12 and 13: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At 0742 1 on 23 M
- Page 14 and 15: A number of masters had deployed in
- Page 16 and 17: 1 FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1 Pasha Bul
- Page 18 and 19: een to Newcastle many times. The th
- Page 20 and 21: Figure 3: Section of navigational c
- Page 22 and 23: particular, with their extended fet
- Page 24 and 25: At 0742, Pasha Bulker’s starboard
- Page 26 and 27: oarding ground for its scheduled be
- Page 28 and 29: By 0600, only 27 ships remained and
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 6: Section of VTIC radar scr
- Page 34 and 35: mates suggested to the master that
- Page 36 and 37: Figure 10: An aerial view of Pasha
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 11: A visualisation of Pasha
- Page 40 and 41: 2 ANALYSIS 2.1 Evidence From 9 to 1
- Page 42 and 43: anchor dragged. The decision was ba
- Page 44 and 45: enough and ascertain the effect of
- Page 46 and 47: No one on the bridge, at any time,
- Page 48 and 49: 2.2.3 The critical decisions A numb
- Page 50 and 51: severe weather at the time, it is l
- Page 52 and 53: While a number of masters probably
- Page 54 and 55: and continued for about 12 hours wi
- Page 56 and 57: the angle increases, the holding po
- Page 58 and 59: For a bulk carrier, the tension in
- Page 60 and 61: It is good practice for bulk carrie
- Page 62 and 63: Along with its safety functions, NP
- Page 64 and 65: decided to remain anchored in adver
- Page 66 and 67: ‘afraid’ because the ‘wind wa
- Page 68 and 69: In early 2004, when the ship queue
- Page 70 and 71: While the coal producers pay demurr
- Page 72 and 73: 3 FINDINGS 3.1 Context On 23 May 20
- Page 74 and 75: minimum considered to be acceptable
- Page 76 and 77: 4 SAFETY ACTIONS 4.1 Safety action
- Page 78 and 79: assumed, incorrectly, that the appr
- Page 80 and 81: MS20080018 A number of masters at N
- Page 82 and 83:
APPENDIX A: EVENTS AND CONDITIONS -
- Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX B: SHIP INFORMATION Pasha
- Page 86 and 87:
APPENDIX C: SOURCES AND SUBMISSIONS
- Page 88 and 89:
Seamanship International Limited, B
- Page 90 and 91:
APPENDIX D: METEOROLOGICAL INFORMAT
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 4: Swell condition Descriptio
- Page 94 and 95:
APPENDIX E: SURVEY INFORMATION AND
- Page 96 and 97:
Question 4: When the weather worsen
- Page 98 and 99:
Factors considered in deciding to l
- Page 100 and 101:
Question 11: Where can you get the
- Page 102 and 103:
Comparison 2a One of the 42 masters
- Page 104 and 105:
APPENDIX F: MEDIA RELEASE ATSB rele