Appel/alit: Status ofAppel/am: Applicallt: Status ... - City of Glendale
Appel/alit: Status ofAppel/am: Applicallt: Status ... - City of Glendale
Appel/alit: Status ofAppel/am: Applicallt: Status ... - City of Glendale
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. Why will granting <strong>of</strong> the variance hot be detrimental to the public weHare?<br />
The proposed structure IS not visible from the public way and the additional height IS only<br />
vIsible from tile eXlstmg residence. It will not Impact the c,,,stlng oak trees<br />
The proposed structure IS nor near any pUblic way and IS anot visible from the public way.<br />
4. Why will granting <strong>of</strong> the variance be in \(eeping with the objective(s) <strong>of</strong> the applicable<br />
regulation(s)?<br />
The granting <strong>of</strong> the vallance will be in I(eepmg with applicable ordinances because tile height<br />
and setback Will not be visible from or near a public way<br />
The proposed structure will be tucked into the eXisting slope and will appear as a one story<br />
element on the re3r and as a two story structure to the interior <strong>of</strong> the property.<br />
The neW structure is designed to be complementary to the eXisting residence which was recently<br />
remodeled. The colors, details and finishes will be the s<strong>am</strong>e as the existing residence.<br />
Statement <strong>of</strong> additional facts related to variance request:<br />
We have met and consulted with Mr. Bill McKlnlley ,<strong>of</strong> Parks and Recreation, and he concurs with<br />
the proposed location <strong>of</strong> the structure. It was mutually recognized that there were not alternatives<br />
for building ·slJch a structure.<br />
The proposed project will maintain all <strong>of</strong> the existing oaks and it does not appear as though any<br />
root systems will be impacted.<br />
:';0'<br />
,.~, :