30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 R a d i u m<br />

wall thickness of which should be equivalent to not less than 2 cm. of<br />

lead.<br />

3. The handling of emanation should, as far as possible, be carried<br />

out during its relatively inactive state. In manipulations where emanation<br />

should be very carefully guarded against, and the room in which<br />

it is prepared should be provided with an exhaust electric fan.<br />

GENERAL<br />

The governing bodies of many institutions where radiological work<br />

is carried on may wish to have further guarantees of the general safety<br />

of the conditions under which their personnel work.<br />

1. Although the committee believe that an adequate degree of<br />

safety would result if the recommendations now put forward were acted<br />

upon, they would point out that this is entirely dependent upon the loyal<br />

co-operation of the personnel in following the precautionary measures<br />

outlined for their benefit.<br />

2. The committee would also point out that the National Physical<br />

Laboratory, Tedding ton. is prepared to carry out exact measurements<br />

upon X-ray protective materials and to arrange for periodic inspection<br />

of existing installations on the lines of the present recommendations.<br />

(Sec Report No. 2.)<br />

3. Further, in view of the varying susceptibilities of workers to<br />

radiation, the committee recommend that wherever possible periodic<br />

tests, e. g., every three months, be made upon the blood of the personnel,<br />

so that any changes which occur may be recognized at an early stage.<br />

In the present state of our knowledge it is difficult to decide when small<br />

variations from the normal blood-count become significant.<br />

REPORT NO. 2<br />

In view of the widespread uncertainty and anxiety as to the efficacy<br />

of the various devices and materials employed for the purposes of protection<br />

against X-rays, the X-ray and Radium Protection Committee<br />

strongly advise that the Heads of X-ray departments of hospitals and<br />

other institutions should safeguard themselves and their staffs on this<br />

score by recommending to the hospital authorities the adoption of the<br />

following precautions:<br />

1. The various protective appliances should be inspected and reported<br />

on by ihe National Physical Laboratory (N.P.L.), Teddington. In<br />

the event of an adverse report, early steps should be taken to carry out<br />

the recommendations of the Laboratory. The laboratory is prepared.<br />

wherever possible or expedient, to engrave (or otherwise suitably mark)<br />

the N. P. L. monogram and year of test on such appliances as provide<br />

the full measure of protection laid down in the Revised Report No. 1 of<br />

the Protection Committee. It should be pointed out that, in the case of<br />

materials which may deteriorate, e. g.. lead rubber, such inspection should<br />

be periodic, say, every twelve months.<br />

2. Within the committee'? recent experience, the working conditions<br />

of X-ray departments, .\ g., lay-out of installations, degree of scattered<br />

radiation, ventilation, high-tension insulation, etc.. arc often unsatisfactory.<br />

It is recommended that such conditions be inspected by<br />

the N.P.L. and that early steps be taken to give effect to such alterations<br />

as may arise out of their report. It is advised that, in the planning of new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!