30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236 R a d i u m<br />

I he rays are unfiltered. and therefore *oft beams give the desired superficial<br />

effect before a harmful quantity of hard rays enter the orbit. The<br />

truth of the latter statement is now becoming apparent. Within the last<br />

few weeks we have learned that ihe lens of the radiated eye in case<br />

Xo. i is developing an opacity,* which is so unlike an ordinary' cataract,<br />

that we must conclude that the amount of ]>enetrating beta and gamma<br />

rays is an important ctiologic factor. Case Xo. 2 is additional evidence.<br />

Dr. Arnold Knapp, consulting ophthalmologist, is now investigating this<br />

problem, in order to definitely prove or disprove the relation.<br />

Case Xo. 2. Male, age 73. was referred to the -clinic June 23rd,<br />

1920. for a growth of the conjunctiva that commenced as a pink nodule<br />

about one year before. Dr. Knapp examined the case and considered<br />

it acanthoma. The tumor measured i!jxi cm., and covered the medial<br />

half of the cornea, extending for about 1 cm. on to the sclera. It was<br />

a firm consistence, greyish-red in color, slightly ulcerated and fixed to<br />

the limbic area but not involving the anterior chamber. Vision was partially<br />

obstructed.<br />

Treatment. Two silver tubes were placed 1 mm. from the lesion.<br />

A dosage of 03 millicurie hours was given. Regression was complete in<br />

six week*.<br />

Comment. Two years later there was no evidence of tumor. However.<br />

Dr. Knapp examined the patient at this time and discovered opacities<br />

in the lens and a partial optic atrophy. In six months, the vision<br />

was entirely destroyed in this eye by a well developed glaucoma, the<br />

pain of which was relieved by an operation that had no effect on vision.<br />

Case Xo. 3. Male, age 39. was first observed on May 28th. 1920.<br />

His previous history was no; significant. The eye lesion commenced<br />

five years before, and grew very slowly. Six weeks prior to coming<br />

to the hospital an operation was i>crformed. There was a prompt recurrence<br />

in ihe scar. The lesion measured 1x0.5 cm*., and overlapped the<br />

limbus on the lateral half of the eye. It was papillary in type and not<br />

ulcerated. An examination of ihe tissue removed at operation, showed a<br />

papillary acanthoma.<br />

Treatment. One silver tube was applied for a dosage of 50 millicurie<br />

hours. Following this ihe patient was lost lo the clinic for nearly<br />

2 years. When next seen, on April 25th. 1022, there was a small recurrence<br />

on the cornea, close to the site of the original tumor. This was<br />

treated on two occasions with the unfiltered bulb, causing a prompt regression<br />

which has lasted for 1 2 '3 years. Vision is perfect.<br />

Comment. In spite of careful application of the silver tube, sufficient<br />

accuracy was not obtained to produce a permanent regresison. This<br />

difficulty has been obviated by the introduction of the bulb.<br />

Case Xo. 4. Male, age 62. About one year before applying for<br />

treatment, a pink growth appeared on the eye. This grew so rapidly<br />

that vision was gone completely in about eight months. Then several<br />

operation* were performed, but all were unsuccessful. Microscopic<br />

diagnosis was acanthoma. Patient now (July 7th, 1921) presents a<br />

greyish-white finely nodular tumor, measuring J< cm. in diameter, and<br />

•Bjce. "orkln? 'n ihe Memorial Hospital researchlaboratory, has reported on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!