30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

Untitled - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE STORY OE ERIE n<br />

NOTICE OF INCORPORATION.<br />

Notice is hereby given that an application will be made to<br />

the Legislature at its next session for the passage of an act<br />

incorporating a company with a capital of ten millions of<br />

dollars for the construction of a railroad from the city or<br />

county of New York to that part of Lake Erie lying between<br />

the mouth of Cattaraugus Creek and the Pennsylvania line,<br />

together with a branch of the Alleghany River, and also for<br />

the establishment of a ferry across such part of the North<br />

River as the route of the main line of the railroad may pass<br />

over.<br />

November 2, 1831.<br />

To further the interests of such a railroad, citizens<br />

of Owego issued a call for a convention at that place,<br />

as being a central one and convenient for the purpose,<br />

to discuss the matter by delegates from all the<br />

counties interested.<br />

This was approved by all, and<br />

the date of the convention was fixed for December<br />

20, 1831. The Ptimpellys and Drakes of Owego,<br />

prominent citizens and large landowners, were the<br />

prime movers in the jDroposed railroad at Owego,<br />

and at Binghamton the Whitneys and other leading<br />

people brought their influence to bear in favor of<br />

it, although that community believed more in the<br />

value and importance of the Chenango Canal than<br />

they did in the efficacy of a railroad to enhance their<br />

interests.<br />

The publication of the applications for a railroad<br />

charter had an effect on the people of the southern<br />

tier and interior counties of New York that was by<br />

no means assuring to the sponsors of the proposed<br />

company in the western counties. The railroad<br />

was to be nearly five hundred miles long, and that a<br />

work of such magnitude could be carried to a successful<br />

issue by one corporation these people doubted.<br />

The State itself, with all the strength of its government<br />

and the resources of its treasury, they argued,<br />

had been ten years in constructing the Erie Canal,<br />

and here was a work, seemingly as formidable, to be<br />

boldly undertaken by a private corporation.<br />

They<br />

affected to see only utter failure as the outcome of<br />

such an unheard-of project, and insisted that there<br />

should be at least two separate companies chartered.<br />

Conventions were held at various places in these and<br />

the adjoining counties, the delegates being composed<br />

of the representative men of those portions of the<br />

State, and strong protests were made<br />

against the<br />

single charter project. At a convention held at<br />

Binghamton, December 15, 1831, at which the counties<br />

of Seneca, Tompkins, Tioga (which<br />

then included<br />

Chemung County), Broome, and Orange, in<br />

New York State, and the Pennsylvania counties of<br />

Wayne, Susquehanna, and Luzerne were represented,<br />

the plan of two charters instead of one was<br />

discussed and approved—that is, the convention advocated<br />

the application to the Legislature for a charter<br />

for a railroad from Owego to New York City,<br />

and<br />

approved of the project for a railroad from<br />

Owego to Lake Erie. At this convention, as at<br />

all the county conventions that had been held, delegates<br />

were appointed to attend the general convention<br />

of people along the line of the proposed railroads<br />

at Owego on December 20, 1831.<br />

As it was<br />

from the result of the action of this gathering of the<br />

representative men of the counties then interested<br />

in the undertaking that the New York and Erie Railroad<br />

Company and the railroad from the tidewater<br />

to Lake Erie were born, the proceedings of the<br />

Owego Convention, although only the cold, formal,<br />

official report of them is possible at this late day,<br />

are an important part of the history of Erie, and<br />

are reproduced here as they were published in the<br />

Owego Gazette of December 22, 1831, together with<br />

the comment of that newspaper on the gathering and<br />

its work:<br />

RAILROAD<br />

CONVENTION.<br />

One of the most numerous and respectable conventions.<br />

we venture to say, that has been convened in this State, for<br />

objects of Internal Improvement, was held in this village on<br />

the 20th and 21st inst., on the subject of a railroad from Lake<br />

Erie to the Hudson. It was composed of delegates from<br />

some fifteenor sixteen counties, besides many gentlemen<br />

from various sections interested in the proposed object, not<br />

members of the convention. It is but justice to say, and we<br />

allude to the fact with much pleasure, as evincing the high<br />

estimation in which the proposed improvement is held by an<br />

intelligent public, that the convention embraced much of the<br />

wealth, talent, and enterprise of this enterprising State. We<br />

have only time to remark, that a cordiality of sentiment prevailed,<br />

in relation to the measures to be pursued for the<br />

attainment of the grand object in view, to a degree that<br />

reflects the highest credit on the convention, and furnishes<br />

the most satisfactory evidence that the object will be persevered<br />

in until finallyaccomplished. The proceedings will<br />

be found below.<br />

THE PROCEEDINGS.<br />

At a meeting of delegates from the counties of Chautauqua,<br />

Cattaraugus, Allegany, Steuben, Tioga. Broome. Chenango,<br />

Delaware, Otsego, Greene, Sullivan, Tompkins, and Seneca<br />

convened at the village of Owego, on the 20th day of Decern-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!