31.12.2013 Views

Volume 9 - Electric Scotland

Volume 9 - Electric Scotland

Volume 9 - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FISHES OF THE FIRTH OF FORTH AND ITS TRIBUTARIES 205<br />

scarce in the estuary, and the few examples which have been<br />

obtained were all immature fish.<br />

One was captured in the trawl of the " Garland," within the<br />

Forth, in February 1893 ;<br />

and another, 8 inches long, was taken<br />

at Station 6 on the 28th of July in the same year.<br />

On the 3oth of November 1894, an example, 12 inches in length,<br />

was again captured by the " Garland " at Station 6.<br />

I think it is<br />

probable that the Ray recorded by Mr. W. S. Young<br />

("Proc.Roy.Phys. Soc. Edin.," vol.ii. pp.4i7-4i9) as"fiaia M'Coyii"<br />

(a name I cannot find in the synonomy of any of the Raiidse) is<br />

referable to the Sandy Ray. M'Coy, in 1841, described ("Ann.<br />

Mag. Nat. Hist.," vol. vi. p. 405), without giving it a name, a Ray from<br />

the coast of Ireland, which afterwards proved to belong to this<br />

species and it is ; possible that Mr. Young considered his Forth<br />

specimen was referable to this form, and adopted for it the specific<br />

name of<br />

Mi<br />

Coyii. Mr. Young's example was 12 inches long and<br />

6.25 broad, and was captured in the " Fluke Hole," off Pittenweem,<br />

in May 1860.<br />

II. ADDITIONAL RECORDS OF RARE SPECIES.<br />

The following records supplement the information given<br />

either in<br />

Dr. Parnell's " Essay " or in my own previous con.tribution,<br />

as the case may be.<br />

PAGELLUS CENTRODONTUS, Delaroche.<br />

PARNELL, pp. 206-209. "I" tne Firth of Forth very little is<br />

known regarding this fish, as its<br />

appearance there is of rare<br />

occurrence. Two specimens, however, have been noticed in<br />

the Firth" (p. 208).<br />

We are not able to add much to the statements made by Dr.<br />

Parnell more than half a century ago. The common Sea-Bream<br />

must still be regarded as an infrequent visitor to, or rare in, the<br />

estuary, though, according to Professor M'Intosh (" Marine Fauna<br />

of St. Andrews,"<br />

it<br />

p. is 172), "not uncommon" in St. Andrews<br />

Bay.<br />

The following are the only additional occurrences known to<br />

me :<br />

Dr. John Alexander Smith records ("Ann. Nat. Hist.," 1852, vol.<br />

ix. p. 154) the capture of an example, 18.5 inches in length,<br />

in a trawl-net off the Isle of May, near the mouth of the Firth,<br />

on the 29th of November 1851. Dr. Smith remarks that it<br />

appears to be a very rare fish, or at least to be very rarely caught<br />

in our neighbouring seas, as far as he has been able to ascertain.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!