You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MARINE MAMMALS OF THE NORTH-EAST OF SCOTLAND 67<br />
specimen had all the under parts white, and was black or<br />
blackish above ;<br />
not " white above and black beneath " as<br />
mentioned in Mr. Lydekker's book on British mammals.<br />
Both the adults, male and female, that I found were black<br />
all over ;<br />
but as proof that they are not even varietally<br />
distinct, my young female had a good deal of white on the<br />
sides and under parts. The male Mesoplodon had a good<br />
many " corduroy " markings on the shoulders and belly ;<br />
the adult female had none of these, but I think it would be<br />
rash to say that this is a sexual difference, as the young<br />
female had traces of these markings.<br />
The sternum of the male had six pairs of ribs attached<br />
to it. The sternum of the female had only five pairs, and<br />
was differently shaped from that of the male. I do not<br />
think, however, that this is a sexual difference, as another<br />
sternum of a male I examined more resembled that of the<br />
female sternum. Here, then, is another case of " individual<br />
variation."<br />
One marked sexual difference is<br />
always<br />
to be seen in<br />
this species. The male has two large functional teeth in<br />
the lower jaw, from which they project about 2 inches above<br />
the gum. The female has only rudimentary ones, and these<br />
are hidden half an inch below the surface of the gum, while<br />
the half-grown female had 50 additional small dolphin-like<br />
teeth present in both jaws. That is to say, there are, in<br />
this young specimen, in addition to the two rudimentary<br />
tusk-like teeth in the lower jaw, 17 small ones behind<br />
them on each side, and 8 on each side of the upper jaw.<br />
I believe a neiv genus was once founded on the presence of<br />
similar rudimentary teeth in Mesoplodon.<br />
It may be interesting to state that the dorsal fin of the<br />
male was placed nearly a foot farther back than that of the<br />
female. Is this another "individual variation"?<br />
I have come to the conclusion that the male stranded in<br />
1896, and the mother and young stranded in 1899, were all<br />
members of one family. It was reported to me in 1896 that<br />
the<br />
stranded whale was accompanied by another, and also a<br />
young one, both of which got away. Now as this species is<br />
over 5 feet long when born, one would expect<br />
it to grow 4 or<br />
4.5 feet more in three years, say 18 inches per annum. The