17.01.2014 Views

Untitled - UNU-IAS - United Nations University

Untitled - UNU-IAS - United Nations University

Untitled - UNU-IAS - United Nations University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As the supply was not continuous, the risks of not maintaining the pressure balance in the system existed, leading<br />

to the possibility of the safely pumped out water becoming contaminated. In addition, as mentioned above, since<br />

the pressure balance in the system is not stable, there is a possibility of the contaminated water to back flow<br />

into the system, especially when a tank is constructed around a tap as shown in Photo 5.1. The possibility of the<br />

back flow occurring happens when the water level goes above the tap, which occurs quite easily when a tank is<br />

constructed around a tap and not beneath it, leading to the contamination of the distribution system. The storage<br />

tanks between the taps and storage containers were introducing highly unacceptable contamination risks to the<br />

safely supplied drinking water.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

It may be pointed out that the main distribution system with primary (from the pump) and secondary (inside<br />

the blocks) branches were installed by DWASA. Usually the connections are made by DWASA after the users<br />

make payments. However, most of the households did not pay the connection fees and made illegal connections<br />

themselves which extended over a few meters. The illegal connections that led outside the blocks included tertiary<br />

branches from Block A, which were more than 30 m long and were not done properly. When the connections are<br />

not done properly, another form of contamination may occur through leakages, where pollutants may be sucked<br />

inside the system by negative pressure created in the system when a pump starts. This problem poses a serious<br />

threat, as there is no provision for chlorination or disinfection of water.<br />

Pt. Outside-1 in Table 5.2 refers to an illegal tap/connection as mentioned above, installed by the people of<br />

the neighborhood outside the blocks, which was further down the distribution system. There was also a big<br />

underground tank installed in one of the neighborhoods outside the blocks by an NGO to store and supply water<br />

to several families (Pt. Outside-2). The tap supplying water to the underground tank was connected to the same<br />

piped distribution system that was connected to the taps supplying water to the residents inside the blocks. Many<br />

people used the underground tank water for drinking and all kinds of washing purposes. However, unacceptable<br />

high levels of contamination were detected at both the illegally installed tap/connection and the legally stored<br />

underground tank outside the blocks (Pt. Outside-1 and Outside-2). After discussions with the users of the<br />

underground tank, it was revealed that there is no mechanism for the regular cleaning of the tank.<br />

5.5 Cost Implication<br />

A summary of the reported costs invested in water supply for drinking purposes by the people surveyed inside<br />

the blocks is presented in Figure 5.3. Invested installation costs by the people for various options during different<br />

periods are presented in detail in Table A-4.2 in Appendix 4.<br />

It is estimated that during the period of hand pump use, the cost of a hand pump and deep-set tube well was<br />

about $US 200. In most cases the pumps were installed free by Concern before 1995. In Figure 5.3, the maintenance<br />

and repair costs are not included, as the residents shared the minor repair costs for hand pumps, and most of the<br />

respondents could not remember how much they spent. They did not do any major repairs, as the costs associated<br />

with doing so were equivalent to that of installing a new pump. According to the focus group information,<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!