24.01.2014 Views

KPMG Sourcing Advisory 3Q12 Global Pulse Survey - KPMG Institutes

KPMG Sourcing Advisory 3Q12 Global Pulse Survey - KPMG Institutes

KPMG Sourcing Advisory 3Q12 Global Pulse Survey - KPMG Institutes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>3Q12</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Pulse</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> | Learn More<br />

All IT BP All Function <strong>Global</strong> Americas EMEA AsiaPac<br />

SSC Key Points of Failure<br />

Shared services "brand" Failure 17% 10% 23% 12% 22% 15% 7% 18%<br />

Executive management support Failure 55% 50% 56% 55% 65% 58% 55% 41%<br />

Customer centricity Failure 27% 26% 31% 19% 24% 17% 43% 24%<br />

Charge back structure Failure 25% 32% 27% 21% 32% 25% 17% 24%<br />

Service quality Failure 47% 47% 47% 52% 49% 49% 43% 59%<br />

Competitive with third party SP alternatives Failure 21% 23% 23% 24% 22% 25% 17% 12%<br />

Run as a business Failure 33% 26% 36% 36% 35% 38% 31% 35%<br />

Enabling IT systems Failure 31% 32% 34% 33% 16% 40% 26% 47%<br />

SSC Impact on Outsourcing Success<br />

Inhibitor 2% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 12%<br />

Neutral/no material impact 13% 20% 9% 9% 9% 11% 15% 24%<br />

Moderately helpful 48% 42% 48% 56% 54% 47% 53% 41%<br />

Strong enabler 38% 34% 42% 35% 37% 42% 33% 24%<br />

Transitions: Key Reasons for "Failures"<br />

Lack of understanding of the deal/scope 49% 48% 56% 57% 31% 50% 65% 44%<br />

Insufficient knowledge transfer & testing 37% 34% 42% 34% 39% 41% 40% 31%<br />

Inadequate proj. planning & due diligence 56% 65% 52% 59% 64% 61% 49% 56%<br />

Poor on-boarding/transfer process 26% 23% 23% 27% 22% 29% 21% 38%<br />

Insufficient trans. mgmnt by both parties 44% 47% 34% 43% 47% 48% 33% 31%<br />

Transition teams not ready at cutover 13% 16% 11% 16% 17% 13% 16% 19%<br />

Missed transition deadlines 10% 8% 14% 14% 6% 7% 16% 13%<br />

Poor transition deliverable quality 19% 19% 20% 18% 14% 13% 16% 38%<br />

Ineffective relationship & program governance during transition 59% 60% 59% 61% 64% 63% 58% 69%<br />

Transitions: Issues Ignored<br />

Adequately resourcing the trans. project 54% 53% 41% 64% 53% 62% 45% 50%<br />

Re-aligning the retained organization 52% 58% 50% 52% 53% 53% 57% 50%<br />

Establishing an effective oversight committee & joint gov. framework 30% 31% 34% 34% 22% 38% 27% 50%<br />

Effectively managing the change 72% 68% 66% 82% 75% 64% 75% 88%<br />

Focusing on the proc. trans. required for the parties to effectively work together 28% 24% 30% 30% 31% 25% 25% 25%<br />

Ensuring checks and balances are in place to validate go-live readiness 23% 26% 25% 25% 17% 29% 18% 44%<br />

Ensuring adequate involvement of the client business units in the transition 40% 36% 39% 41% 42% 38% 41% 31%<br />

Validating the contract scope of services 8% 10% 13% 7% 11% 9% 5% 0%<br />

Shared Services and Outsourcing <strong>Advisory</strong> / <strong>KPMG</strong> <strong>Sourcing</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>3Q12</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Pulse</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> / October 2012 45<br />

© 2012 <strong>KPMG</strong> International Cooperative (“<strong>KPMG</strong> International”). <strong>KPMG</strong> International provides no client services<br />

and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the <strong>KPMG</strong> network are affiliated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!