Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning
Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning
Sensors and Methods for Mobile Robot Positioning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
58 Part I <strong>Sensors</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>Robot</strong> <strong>Positioning</strong><br />
Fe<br />
Indium<br />
arsenide<br />
Fe<br />
Fe Indium<br />
arsenide<br />
Figure 2.25: A pair of indium-arsenide-ferrite Hall-effect sensors (one<br />
shown) are positioned between flux concentrating wings of mumetal in<br />
this early Motorola prototype. (Adapted from [Wiley, 1964].)<br />
Fe<br />
sensed magnetic heading. Excellent response linearity was reported down to flux densities of 0.001<br />
Gauss [Willey, 1962].<br />
Maenaka et al. [1990] report on the development of a monolithic silicon magnetic compass at the<br />
Toyohashi University of Technology in Japan, based on two orthogonal Hall-effect sensors. Their use<br />
of the terminology “magnetic compass” is perhaps an un<strong>for</strong>tunate misnomer in that the prototype<br />
device was tested with an external field of 1,000 Gauss. Contrast this with the strength of the earth’s<br />
magnetic field, which varies from only about 0.1 Gauss at the equator to about 0.9 Gauss at the poles.<br />
Silicon-based Hall-effect sensors have a lower sensitivity limit of around 10 Gauss [Lenz, 1990]. It<br />
is likely the Toyohashi University device was intended <strong>for</strong> other than geomagnetic applications, such<br />
as remote position sensing of rotating mechanical assemblies.<br />
This prototype Hall-effect magnetometer is still of interest in that it represents a fully selfcontained<br />
implementation of a two-axis magnetometer in integrated circuit <strong>for</strong>m. Two vertical Hall<br />
cells [Maenaka et al., 1987] are arranged at right angles (see Figure 2.25) on a 4.7 mm² chip, with<br />
their respective outputs coupled to a companion signal processing IC of identical size. (Two separate<br />
chips were fabricated <strong>for</strong> the prototype instead of a single integrated unit to enhance production<br />
yield.) The sensor <strong>and</strong> signal processing ICs are interconnected (along with some external variable<br />
resistors <strong>for</strong> calibration purposes) on a glass-epoxy printed circuit board.<br />
The dedicated signal-processing circuitry converts the B-field components B x <strong>and</strong> B y measured by<br />
the Hall sensors into an angle 2 by means of the analog operation [Maenaka et al., 1990]:<br />
2 ' arctan B x<br />
B y<br />
(2.15)<br />
where<br />
2 = angle between B-field axis <strong>and</strong> sensor<br />
B x = x-component of B-field<br />
B y = y-component of B-field.<br />
The analog output of the signal-processing IC is a DC voltage which varies linearly with vector<br />
orientation of the ambient magnetic field in a plane parallel to the chip surface. Reported test results<br />
show a fairly straight-line response (i.e., ± 2 percent full scale) <strong>for</strong> external field strengths ranging<br />
from 8,000 Gauss down to 500 Gauss; below this level per<strong>for</strong>mance begins to degrade rapidly<br />
[Maenaka et al., 1990]. A second analog output on the IC provides an indication of the absolute value<br />
of field intensity.