05.02.2014 Views

2010-07 - Korea IT Times

2010-07 - Korea IT Times

2010-07 - Korea IT Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Analysis<br />

c) U-<strong>IT</strong>/IPTV initiates new crime. As I<br />

write this there are two unknown and<br />

unwanted c2c networks snooping the<br />

notebook I write on, one traceable to<br />

Yongsan, the other to California.<br />

d) U Health/Welfare is one of the systems<br />

like ‘a)’ that are as good as the people<br />

operating them. New rules or 'game like'<br />

rules are not yet apparent. Could be subject<br />

to the same caveats as ‘a).’<br />

To subvert : labor relations, bargaining<br />

and negotiation between employer and<br />

employee or buyer and seller should be destroyed<br />

and replaced with a third party.<br />

K U-City not expressly<br />

implied.<br />

This discussion does not conclude that<br />

the goal of U-City is to subvert, it looks at<br />

what it might subvert in an effort to table<br />

what that means. The main areas that appear<br />

to be able to be subverted under the<br />

U-City plan are power stuctures in the<br />

way we relate to goverment, educators, socially<br />

and social skills as well as culture<br />

and cultural hierarchies. Also, law and order<br />

might be subverted via surveillance, relation<br />

styles with civil servants, political<br />

stucture types, crime types and prevention<br />

remedies as well as ways of relating to<br />

health and welfare practitioners. I have no<br />

space for a longer discussion. It might be<br />

asked, well this is all very nice and you<br />

drew a nice diagram, but what does it<br />

mean? It means that the U-City plan is capable<br />

of subverting and subversion comes<br />

with tangible, as the <strong>Korea</strong>n government<br />

knows, and intangible costs. The example<br />

question I leave you with is what is the immediate<br />

and long term cost of goverment<br />

control of polite behavior in a online culture?<br />

Remembering that this is an element<br />

of socialising that the government has absolutely<br />

never had a say in, until now. This<br />

is one of the overt subversion of socialisation<br />

elements directly attributable to the<br />

U-City infrastructure. What are the costs of<br />

potential subversion of all of these things<br />

compared to the gains? Is the subversion<br />

taking <strong>Korea</strong> where it wants to go?<br />

Donna vitasovich / donnavitasovich@koreaittimes.com<br />

www.koreaittimes.com 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!