2010-07 - Korea IT Times
2010-07 - Korea IT Times
2010-07 - Korea IT Times
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Analysis<br />
c) U-<strong>IT</strong>/IPTV initiates new crime. As I<br />
write this there are two unknown and<br />
unwanted c2c networks snooping the<br />
notebook I write on, one traceable to<br />
Yongsan, the other to California.<br />
d) U Health/Welfare is one of the systems<br />
like ‘a)’ that are as good as the people<br />
operating them. New rules or 'game like'<br />
rules are not yet apparent. Could be subject<br />
to the same caveats as ‘a).’<br />
To subvert : labor relations, bargaining<br />
and negotiation between employer and<br />
employee or buyer and seller should be destroyed<br />
and replaced with a third party.<br />
K U-City not expressly<br />
implied.<br />
This discussion does not conclude that<br />
the goal of U-City is to subvert, it looks at<br />
what it might subvert in an effort to table<br />
what that means. The main areas that appear<br />
to be able to be subverted under the<br />
U-City plan are power stuctures in the<br />
way we relate to goverment, educators, socially<br />
and social skills as well as culture<br />
and cultural hierarchies. Also, law and order<br />
might be subverted via surveillance, relation<br />
styles with civil servants, political<br />
stucture types, crime types and prevention<br />
remedies as well as ways of relating to<br />
health and welfare practitioners. I have no<br />
space for a longer discussion. It might be<br />
asked, well this is all very nice and you<br />
drew a nice diagram, but what does it<br />
mean? It means that the U-City plan is capable<br />
of subverting and subversion comes<br />
with tangible, as the <strong>Korea</strong>n government<br />
knows, and intangible costs. The example<br />
question I leave you with is what is the immediate<br />
and long term cost of goverment<br />
control of polite behavior in a online culture?<br />
Remembering that this is an element<br />
of socialising that the government has absolutely<br />
never had a say in, until now. This<br />
is one of the overt subversion of socialisation<br />
elements directly attributable to the<br />
U-City infrastructure. What are the costs of<br />
potential subversion of all of these things<br />
compared to the gains? Is the subversion<br />
taking <strong>Korea</strong> where it wants to go?<br />
Donna vitasovich / donnavitasovich@koreaittimes.com<br />
www.koreaittimes.com 15