Coffee Eco-labeling:

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Flaws in <strong>Eco</strong>-Labeling for Growers “The entry cost to organic production, even subsidized, appears to be too high for the smallest producers, but organic production is a significant option for the slightly larger producers (Bray et al. 2002).”
Consumers Pro-Certification Arguments: Growers cannot get a premium Big companies cannot be held accountable unless they have certification Confidence that the coffee purchased actually serves the purpose Ensures good scientific criteria Helps make an informed decision
Page 1 and 2: Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prospe
Page 3 and 4: Question at Hand Is eco-labeling of
Page 5 and 6: Background • Eco-labeling - A str
Page 7 and 8: Shade-grown Fair trade Organic
Page 9 and 10: Fair Trade • Seeks to offer small
Page 11 and 12: Shade Grown • Grown under a canop
Page 13 and 14: Environmental Impacts • Loss of b
Page 15 and 16: Socio-Economics How far does the wo
Page 17: Flaws in Eco-Labeling for Growers
Page 21 and 22: Consumers Three approaches: 1. Farm
Page 23 and 24: Drawbacks and Failures 1. Inversion
Page 25 and 26: Alternative Certification Systems C

Coffee Eco-labeling:

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?