16.02.2014 Views

Field Trial of Optical Fibre Cable-TV System Optical Fibre System for ...

Field Trial of Optical Fibre Cable-TV System Optical Fibre System for ...

Field Trial of Optical Fibre Cable-TV System Optical Fibre System for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Renewal <strong>of</strong> the London Underground<br />

Telecommunications Network<br />

Roger Linton<br />

The London Underground railway covers 668 miles <strong>of</strong> surface and tube track,<br />

served by 272 stations, and carries over 2 million passengers every working day.<br />

In 1979 this busy undertaking decided to replace its telephone system, which is<br />

vital to the efficient operation <strong>of</strong> the railway and administrative organisation. The<br />

old one was a Strowger system <strong>of</strong> the 40s.<br />

The author gives the background <strong>of</strong> the project and describes the various parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> MD110 exchanges, optical fibre transmission systems, the<br />

cut-over and the organisation required to complete the task.<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice wiring changes was also a new<br />

feature. However, there were a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> disadvantages when applied to railway<br />

use since:<br />

- it was not a fully solid state switch,<br />

relays were used as an interface on<br />

exchange and tie line boards.<br />

- it consumed a large amount <strong>of</strong> power:<br />

10 kVA <strong>for</strong> a 248-line exchange.<br />

- it had no battery backup.<br />

UDC 621.395.2<br />

535.394<br />

private telephone exchanges<br />

telephone networks<br />

optical links<br />

railways<br />

installation<br />

In 1974 the major part <strong>of</strong> London Transport's<br />

Strowger PABX had been in service<br />

<strong>for</strong> 35 years, and preliminary planning<br />

commenced to replace it, fig. 1.<br />

Generally, Strowger equipment was expected<br />

to have a service life <strong>of</strong> between<br />

25 and 30 years but with the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> crossbar, followed by reed electronic<br />

exchanges in the late 1960s, it<br />

seemed prudent to wait <strong>for</strong> a fully electronic<br />

exchange to appear.<br />

IBM manufactured their 3750 Stored<br />

Programme Controlled (SPC) analogue<br />

exchange, and London Transport purchased<br />

one <strong>for</strong> evaluation in 1975. It<br />

proved very popular with users, especially<br />

the facilities; and the ability to<br />

change numbers from the maintenance<br />

terminal which did not normally involve<br />

The IBM 3750 was marketed at a time<br />

which caught the UK Telecommunication<br />

Industry without an equivalent<br />

product, but by the late 1970s other<br />

SPC exchanges became available and<br />

with battery backup.<br />

In 1975 we commissioned our first 30-<br />

channel PCM system to Hounslow West<br />

exchange <strong>for</strong> the extension <strong>of</strong> the Piccadilly<br />

Line to Heathrow Central. Other<br />

PCM systems were quickly incorporated<br />

into the network to improve overall<br />

transmission quality, and having<br />

adopted time division multiplexing <strong>for</strong><br />

junctions it became clearthere would be<br />

considerable advantages to do likewise<br />

with the new exchanges.<br />

Traffic studies <strong>of</strong> current and future<br />

growth led to a requirement <strong>for</strong> 18 telephone<br />

exchanges to cover the London<br />

East Finchley<br />

41XX<br />

Finsbury Park<br />

6XXX<br />

Barking<br />

29XX<br />

Fig. 1<br />

The old Strowger telephone system<br />

Tandem exchange<br />

Hounslow<br />

West<br />

22XX<br />

^P<br />

Main exchange<br />

Stockwell<br />

42XX

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!