02.03.2014 Views

National Survey of Research Commercialisation - Australian ...

National Survey of Research Commercialisation - Australian ...

National Survey of Research Commercialisation - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. COUNTRY COMPARISONS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Commercialisation</strong> generated information about the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> research commercialisation activity occurring in universities, medical research<br />

institutes and CSIRO in Australia.<br />

An analysis was undertaken to compare that information with information about<br />

commercial activities occurring in similar institutions in the USA and Canada. Data<br />

from CSIRO were excluded from this analysis.<br />

The data presented in Section 2 <strong>of</strong> this report were collected using a questionnaire<br />

that was based on the questionnaire used in the Association <strong>of</strong> University Technology<br />

Managers (AUTM) Licensing <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> technology licensing and related performance for<br />

US and Canadian academic and non-pr<strong>of</strong>it institutions and patent management firms.<br />

This was to enable Year 2000 data collected from <strong>Australian</strong> institutions in the <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Commercialisation</strong> to be compared directly with that for US and<br />

Canadian institutions collected in the AUTM Licensing <strong>Survey</strong>: Fiscal Year 2000.<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this comparative analysis, data for Australia comprised that<br />

from all universities and medical research institutes that responded to the <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Commercialisation</strong>. Data for the USA and Canada comprised<br />

that for all institutions that responded to the AUTM Licensing <strong>Survey</strong>: Fiscal<br />

Year 2000 — a list <strong>of</strong> respondent institutions can be found in the full report for<br />

that survey (Association <strong>of</strong> University Technology Managers, 2002).<br />

The indicators that were used to undertake the country comparisons were:<br />

number <strong>of</strong> US patents issued in Year 2000;<br />

number <strong>of</strong> licences executed in Year 2000;<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> adjusted gross income from licences in Year 2000; and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> start-up companies that were formed in Year 2000.<br />

Country comparisons were made on the basis <strong>of</strong> ratios <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these indicators to<br />

research expenditure, as a way <strong>of</strong> adjusting absolute levels <strong>of</strong> commercialisation activity<br />

in these four areas in the three countries relative to the magnitude <strong>of</strong> expenditures on<br />

research in those countries.<br />

For each country, research expenditure was the sum <strong>of</strong> the research expenditures <strong>of</strong><br />

institutions in that country that responded to the relevant survey.<br />

For each country, research expenditure expressed in local currency was converted to US<br />

dollars by dividing that expenditure by the purchasing power parities (PPPs) developed<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!