05.03.2014 Views

Highlights of 2011 - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern ...

Highlights of 2011 - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern ...

Highlights of 2011 - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Education <strong>Policy</strong><br />

IPR economist Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach points to how higher quality kindergarten classrooms, which include smaller class<br />

sizes and more effective teachers, can lead to better adult outcomes, including higher earnings.<br />

RESEARCH TOPICS:<br />

• School finance, accountability, and vouchers<br />

• Education interventions and program evaluations<br />

• Teacher and principal characteristics<br />

• Transitions from high school to college<br />

• Gaps in academic achievement<br />

Kindergarten Teachers and Future Pay<br />

Does it matter who your teacher is in kindergarten? In an innovative<br />

study, Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, an IPR economist,<br />

and her colleagues at Harvard and the University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia,<br />

Berkeley test whether kindergarten classroom quality<br />

and student test scores affect adult outcomes. They use 1980s<br />

data from the Tennessee Project STAR experiment, which randomly<br />

assigned nearly 12,000 children to kindergarten classes<br />

<strong>of</strong> varying sizes. The researchers then use tax data to link the<br />

students’ kindergarten class experience and test scores to adult<br />

outcomes, such as wages and education. Though the students’<br />

test-score boost from small class sizes and high-quality teachers<br />

tends to diminish later in elementary school, a substantial impact<br />

is found <strong>for</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> adult outcomes. In particular, students<br />

randomly assigned to a higher quality kindergarten classroom<br />

earned more at age 30 and were more likely to own a home,<br />

be married, and have retirement savings than their kindergarten<br />

schoolmates assigned to a worse class. Showing that early classroom<br />

environments have a long-term impact not captured by<br />

standardized test scores, the researchers also point to the<br />

potential hazard <strong>of</strong> relying on such scores to evaluate longterm<br />

student achievement. Published in The Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, the study was covered by The New York Times.<br />

Gains from Early Intervention<br />

In a working paper with Susan Dynarski and Joshua Hyman <strong>of</strong><br />

the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, Schanzenbach examines the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing elementary school class sizes on college enrollment<br />

and getting a degree. Using Project STAR data, they find being<br />

randomly assigned to attend a smaller class in kindergarten<br />

through third grade increases the probability <strong>of</strong> attending<br />

college. Assignment to a small class increases the probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> attending college by 2.7 percentage points, with effects<br />

more than twice as large among African Americans. Among<br />

those with the lowest ex ante probability <strong>of</strong> attending college,<br />

the effect is 11 percentage points. In addition, small classes in<br />

the early grades improve the likelihood <strong>of</strong> earning a college<br />

degree and majoring in a more technical and high-earning<br />

field, such as a STEM field (science, technology, engineering,<br />

and mathematics), business, or economics. The paper points to<br />

the relationship between short- and long-term effects <strong>of</strong> an<br />

education intervention. More specifically, it documents shortand<br />

long-term effects <strong>of</strong> early education interventions. The<br />

actual long-run impacts were larger than what short-run test<br />

score gains alone would have predicted. This implies that costbenefit<br />

analyses based on short-run impacts might misestimate<br />

the true long-run effectiveness <strong>of</strong> interventions.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!