05.03.2014 Views

pdf - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

pdf - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

pdf - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Ray<br />

Child, Adolescent, and family studies<br />

10<br />

New Hope collaborators at work on a book<br />

about the project.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> at the <strong>University</strong> of Michigan.<br />

The Annie E. Casey Foundation<br />

and Searle Fund <strong>for</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

supplemented NICHD funding <strong>for</strong> this<br />

portion of the study.<br />

In the Next Generation Study, a randomassignment<br />

evaluation of 16 welfare-towork<br />

programs supported by NICHD,<br />

economist Greg Duncan, Edwina S. Tarry<br />

Professor of Education and Social <strong>Policy</strong>,<br />

and fellow researchers at the Manpower<br />

Demonstration <strong>Research</strong> Corporation<br />

and the <strong>University</strong> of Texas-Austin are<br />

studying the policy impacts on children<br />

and youth as well as addressing more<br />

fundamental developmental issues such<br />

as the role of income and childcare on<br />

child and youth development. Some of<br />

the findings by Duncan and his colleagues<br />

include:<br />

• Modest improvements in school<br />

achievement <strong>for</strong> younger children (aged<br />

2 to 5) in families that were offered<br />

earnings supplements. This was perhaps<br />

due to the increased use of center-based<br />

childcare arrangements.<br />

• Poorer outcomes <strong>for</strong><br />

adolescents in families<br />

affected by welfare<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m. The adolescents<br />

did worse in school,<br />

repeated grades more<br />

often, and used more<br />

special educational<br />

services than the<br />

control group. Teen<br />

childbearing was not<br />

affected. Adolescents<br />

with younger siblings had<br />

the most trouble, perhaps<br />

because they were also<br />

more likely to take care<br />

of their siblings.<br />

Duncan is leading an eight-year follow-up<br />

of New Hope, a work-support program<br />

in Milwaukee, which received funding<br />

from NICHD. The program randomly<br />

assigned families to a treatment group<br />

and provided wage, childcare, and healthinsurance<br />

subsidies to those parents<br />

working at least 30 hours. The researchers<br />

are interviewing all mothers and children<br />

in the program to gauge whether children<br />

are still experiencing positive benefits<br />

13 years later. A substudy of 44 families,<br />

who have been followed since their<br />

third year in the program, is providing<br />

researchers with an in-depth view of their<br />

experiences. Duncan has also co-written<br />

a book about the New Hope experience,<br />

Higher Ground: New Hope <strong>for</strong> the Working<br />

Poor and Their Children (see p. 18).<br />

In the Illinois Families Study (IFS),<br />

human development and social policy<br />

professor Dan A. Lewis and colleagues<br />

studied <strong>for</strong>mer welfare recipients and the<br />

larger implications <strong>for</strong> welfare re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

from 1999 to 2004. Lewis is currently<br />

working on a book manuscript that will<br />

summarize the study’s major findings.<br />

They include evidence of a great deal<br />

of “churning,” or movement in and out<br />

of different sectors of occupations and<br />

industries, low wages, and precarious<br />

situations <strong>for</strong> those who cannot find work.<br />

A recent study, written by Lewis, research<br />

methodologist Spyros Konstantopoulos,<br />

and IPR graduate research assistant<br />

Lisa Altenbernd, focuses on the littleresearched<br />

area of how recipients are<br />

actually earning a living through work<br />

under TANF. Using cross-sectional and<br />

longitudinal analyses, the researchers<br />

confirm that education, job skills, and<br />

health are important determinants<br />

of labor-market participation and<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. In addition, long-term<br />

welfare recipients are as likely to find and<br />

per<strong>for</strong>m well in a job as short-term welfare<br />

recipients. They also find that government<br />

housing subsidies have a positive effect on<br />

finding and holding a job.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!