pdf - Institute for Policy Research - Northwestern University

the Moving to Opportunity experiment.
Journal of Human Resources 41(4): 649–91.
Duncan, G., with E. Snell. 2006. Child
characteristics and successful use of housing
vouchers: Estimates from MTO.
Housing Policy Debate 17(4): 727-54.
Duncan, G., with K. Magnuson. 2006. The
role of family socioeconomic resources in
black and white test score gaps among young
children. Developmental Review 26(4): 365-99.
Duncan, G., and A. Zuberi. 2006. Mobility
lessons from Gautreaux and Moving to
Opportunity. Journal of Law and Social Policy
1(1): 110-26.
Duncan, G., P. England, and B. Wilkerson.
2006. Cleaning up their act: The effects of
marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit
drug use. Demography 43(4): 691-710.
Duncan, G. 2006. Family structure, poverty
and family well-being. Employee Rights and
Employment Policy Journal 10(1): 9-45.
Duncan, G., and K. Magnuson. 2006. Costs
and benefits from early investments to promote
human capital and positive behavior.
In The Crisis in Youth Mental Health: Critical
Issues and Effective Programs, ed. N. Watt, et
al., vol. 4, 27-51. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Duncan, G., and J. Ludwig. 2006. Promising
solutions in housing and the community. In
Deviant Peer Influences in Programs for Youth:
Problems and Solutions, ed. K. Dodge and T.
Dishion, 312-27. New York: Guilford Press.
Duncan, G., and E. Clark-Kauffman and
E. Snell. 2006. Residential mobility interventions
as treatments for the sequelae of
neighborhood violence. In Interventions for
Children Exposed to Violence, ed. A. Lieberman
and R. DeMartino, 237-70. Johnson &
Johnson Pediatric Institute.
Duncan, G., with K. Magnuson and A.
Kalil. 2006. The contribution of middle
childhood contexts to adolescent achievement
and behavior. In Developmental
Context of Middle Childhood: Bridges to
Adolescence and Adulthood, ed. A. C. Huston
and M. H. Ripke, 150-172, New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Alice Eagly
Eagly, A. H., and A. B. Diekman. 2006.
Examining gender gaps in sociopolitical
attitudes: It’s not Mars and Venus. Feminism
and Psychology 16:26-34.
Killeen, L. A., E. Lopez-Zafra, and A. H.
Eagly. 2006. Envisioning oneself as a leader:
Comparisons of women and men in Spain
and the United States. Psychology of Women
Quarterly 30:312-22.
Eastwick, P. W., A. H. Eagly, P. Glick, M.
Johannesen-Schmidt, and S. T. Fiske. 2006.
Is traditional gender ideology associated
with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in
nine nations. Sex Roles 54:609-14.
Eagly, A. H., and A. Koenig. 2006.
Social role theory of sex differences and
similarities: Implications for prosocial
behavior. In Sex Differences and Similarities
in Communication 2nd ed., ed. K. Dindia
and D. J. Canary, 161-94. Mahwah, N.J.:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagly, A. H. 2006. Refereeing literature
review submissions to journals. In Reviewing
Scientific Works in Psychology, ed. R.
Sternberg, 59-77. Washington, D.C.:
American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A. H., and W. Wood. 2006. Three
ways that data can misinform: Inappropriate
partialling, small samples, and anyway,
they’re not playing our song. Psychological
Inquiry 17(2): 131-37.
“Gautreaux One proves that
families—both adults and their
children—placed in affluent,
integrated, and much safer
neighborhoods are able to build
new lives for themselves and
maintain these residential successes.
MTO and early results
from Gautreaux Two suggest
that neighborhood changes
may be necessary but not sufficient
conditions for improvement;
many families in these
more recent programs appear
to need other supports in order
to be truly successful.”
Duncan, G., and A. Zuberi. 2006.
Mobility lessons from Gautreaux
and Moving to Opportunity. Journal
of Law and Social Policy 1(1):
110-26 (pp. 120-21).
www.northwestern.edu/ipr 57