07.03.2014 Views

Octagon Investment Partners IX, Ltd. JPMorgan - Irish Stock Exchange

Octagon Investment Partners IX, Ltd. JPMorgan - Irish Stock Exchange

Octagon Investment Partners IX, Ltd. JPMorgan - Irish Stock Exchange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Non-Compliance with Restrictions on Ownership of the Offered Securities or with the United States <strong>Investment</strong><br />

Company Act Could Adversely Affect the Issuer<br />

Neither the Issuer nor the Co-Issuer has registered with the United States Securities and <strong>Exchange</strong> Commission<br />

("SEC") as an investment company pursuant to the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act, in reliance on an exception under<br />

Section 3(c)(7) of the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act for investment companies (a) whose outstanding securities are<br />

beneficially owned only by "qualified purchasers" and "knowledgeable employees" and certain transferees thereof<br />

identified in Rules 3c-5 and 3c-6 under the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act and (b) which do not make a public offering of<br />

their securities in the United States.<br />

If the SEC or a court of competent jurisdiction were to find that the Issuer or the Co-Issuer is required, but in<br />

violation of the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act had failed, to register as an investment company, possible consequences<br />

include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the SEC could apply to a district court to enjoin the violation;<br />

(ii) investors in the Issuer and the Co-Issuer could sue the Issuer and the Co-Issuer and recover any damages caused<br />

by the violation; and (iii) any contract to which the Issuer and/or the Co-Issuer is party that is made in violation of<br />

the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act or whose performance involves such violation would be unenforceable by any party to<br />

the contract unless a court were to find that under the circumstances enforcement would produce a more equitable<br />

result than non-enforcement and would not be inconsistent with the purposes of the <strong>Investment</strong> Company Act. In<br />

addition, such a finding would constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture. Should the Issuer or the<br />

Co-Issuer be subjected to any or all of the foregoing, the Issuer and the Co-Issuer would be materially and adversely<br />

affected.<br />

Book-Entry Holders Are Not Considered Holders Under the Indenture<br />

Holders of beneficial interests in any Notes held in global form will not be considered holders of such Notes<br />

under the Indenture. After payment of any interest, principal or other amount to DTC, neither the Issuer nor the Co-<br />

Issuer will have any responsibility or liability for the payment of such amount by DTC or to any holder of a<br />

beneficial interest in a Note. DTC or its nominee will be the sole holder for any Notes held in global form, and<br />

therefore each person owning a beneficial interest in a Note held in global form must rely on the procedures of DTC<br />

(and if such person is not a participant in DTC on the procedures of the participant through which such person holds<br />

such interest) with respect to the exercise of any rights of a holder of a Note under the Indenture.<br />

Anti-Money Laundering Provisions<br />

The Uniting and Strengthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct<br />

Terrorism Act of 2001 (the "USA PATRIOT Act"), signed into law on and effective as of October 26, 2001,<br />

imposes anti-money laundering obligations on different types of financial institutions, including banks, broker<br />

dealers and investment companies. The USA PATRIOT Act requires the Secretary of the United States Department<br />

of the Treasury (the "Treasury") to prescribe regulations to define the types of investment companies subject to the<br />

USA PATRIOT Act and the related anti-money laundering obligations. It is not clear whether Treasury will require<br />

entities such as the Issuer to enact anti-money laundering policies. It is possible that Treasury will promulgate<br />

regulations requiring the Co-Issuers or the Collateral Manager or other service providers to the Co-Issuers, in<br />

connection with the establishment of anti-money laundering procedures, to share information with governmental<br />

authorities with respect to investors in the Offered Securities. Such legislation and/or regulations could require the<br />

Co-Issuers to implement additional restrictions on the transfer of the Offered Securities. As may be required, the<br />

Issuer reserves the right to request such information and take such actions as are necessary to enable it to comply<br />

with the USA PATRIOT Act.<br />

Investors Will Indirectly Bear Expenses of the Issuer<br />

Through their investment in the Offered Securities, investors bear the cost of the Base Collateral Management<br />

Fee, Subordinated Collateral Management Fee and Collateral Management Incentive Fee and other expenses<br />

described in this Offering Memorandum. In the aggregate, these fees and expenses may be greater than if an<br />

investor were directly to make investments identical to the Collateral Debt Obligations. Payment of any taxes and<br />

filing and registration fees is required to be payable before any of the other amounts owed by the Co-Issuers. In<br />

addition, Interest Proceeds and Principal Proceeds are required to be available for the payment of expenses in<br />

accordance with the Priority of Payments. If funds are not sufficient to pay the expenses incurred by the Co-Issuers,<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!