08.03.2014 Views

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1<br />

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

<strong>The</strong> links between humanitarian action and conflict are very<br />

old. Nonetheless, discussion of the topic is comparatively recent<br />

and often assumes that there is something new about post-Cold<br />

War conflicts that renders the conflict connection particularly<br />

significant. Since the beginning of modern humanitarian practice<br />

in the 19 th century, however, humanitarian actors have been<br />

faced with the fact that their actions might affect the course of<br />

conflict and might influence the outcome. <strong>The</strong>y have struggled<br />

with differing views about whether this connection should be a<br />

matter of legitimate concern and on the appropriateness of<br />

neutrality itself.<br />

Concern over the conflict connection was evident in World<br />

War I, when the Entente powers feared that some assistance<br />

provided by Belgian Relief Commission (BRC) to civilian victims<br />

in Belgium and German-occupied France would be diverted to<br />

the German military. In fact, British approval and funding of the<br />

relief program was conditioned on “stopping the leaks.” <strong>The</strong><br />

British were also adamant that the independence of BRC personnel<br />

and their freedom of movement in the field be maintained,<br />

since otherwise the Germans could exercise control over distribution<br />

(see Box 1.1). <strong>The</strong> BRC’s work in Belgium is a striking<br />

example of maintaining impartiality and neutrality in very<br />

demanding political circumstances and of controlling the impacts<br />

of humanitarian action on conflict. 1 As was noted in the<br />

companion monograph on the interaction between humanitarian<br />

action and politics, 2 this success was itself crucial in maintaining<br />

access to vulnerable populations in German-occupied<br />

Belgium.<br />

In the Spanish Civil War, by contrast, there was little pretense<br />

of impartiality and neutrality among the many humanitarian<br />

actors that responded to the conflict. With a few exceptions, such<br />

as ICRC and the Society of Friends [Quakers], 3 humanitarian<br />

agencies worked on one side of the conflict or the other. “While<br />

Fascist states supported Franco, the Soviet Union, civil society<br />

and the political Left in Western democracies aided the Republic.”<br />

4 <strong>The</strong>y did so largely in solidarity with one or the other cause,<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!